Wastewater treatment process impact on energy savings and greenhouse gas emissions.

The objective of this research was to assess the energy consumption of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs), to apply a mathematical model to evaluate their carbon footprint, and to propose energy saving strategies that can be implemented to reduce both energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in Greece. The survey was focused on 10 WWTPs in Greece with a treatment capacity ranging from 10,000 to 4,000,000 population equivalents (PE). Based on the results, annual specific energy consumption ranged from 15 to 86 kWh/PE. The highest energy consumer in all the WWTPs was aeration, accounting for 40-75% of total energy requirements. The annual GHG emissions varied significantly according to the treatment schemes employed and ranged between 61 and 161 kgCO₂e/PE. The highest values of CO₂emissions were obtained in extended aeration systems and the lowest in conventional activated sludge systems. Key strategies that the wastewater industry could adopt to mitigate GHG emissions are identified and discussed. A case study is presented to demonstrate potential strategies for energy savings and GHG emission reduction. Given the results, it is postulated that the reduction of dissolved oxygen (DO) set points and sludge retention time can provide significant energy savings and decrease GHG emissions.

[1]  Laura Snip,et al.  Quantifying the greenhouse gas emissions of wastewater treatment plants , 2009 .

[2]  L. Corominas,et al.  Including greenhouse gas emissions during benchmarking of wastewater treatment plant control strategies. , 2011, Water research.

[3]  Maziar Bani Shahabadi,et al.  Estimation of greenhouse gas emissions from industrial wastewater treatment plants , 2008 .

[4]  F. Haghighat,et al.  Impact of process design on greenhouse gas (GHG) generation by wastewater treatment plants. , 2009, Water research.

[5]  M K Stenstrom,et al.  Greenhouse gas production: a comparison between aerobic and anaerobic wastewater treatment technology. , 2005, Water research.

[6]  Michael E. Webber,et al.  Energy recovery from wastewater treatment plants in the United States: A case study of the energy-water nexus , 2010 .

[7]  Zhiguo Yuan,et al.  Nitrous oxide generation in full-scale biological nutrient removal wastewater treatment plants. , 2010, Water research.

[8]  J Krampe,et al.  Energy benchmarking of South Australian WWTPs. , 2013, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[9]  Masao Shimada,et al.  Benchmarking energy consumption in municipal wastewater treatment plants in Japan. , 2010, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[10]  D J I Gustavsson,et al.  Carbon footprints of Scandinavian wastewater treatment plants. , 2013, Water science and technology : a journal of the International Association on Water Pollution Research.

[11]  J. Houghton,et al.  Climate change 2001 : the scientific basis , 2001 .

[12]  H. MacLean,et al.  Comparison of on-site and upstream greenhouse gas emissions from Canadian municipal wastewater treatment facilities , 2006 .

[13]  D. Butler,et al.  Multi-objective optimisation of wastewater treatment plant control to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. , 2014, Water research.

[14]  P. Balmér,et al.  Operation costs and consumption of resources at Nordic nutrient removal plants , 2000 .