An analysis tool to quantify the efficiency of cell tethering and firm-adhesion in the parallel-plate flow chamber.

The parallel-plate flow chamber is applied in immunological studies to quantify the adhesivity of cells (e.g. leukocytes) onto ligand-bearing substrates (e.g. endothelial cells) under fluid-flow conditions that mimic the human vasculature. It is also applied to quantify platelet adhesion in vascular injury models, and tumor cell adhesion in models of cancer metastasis. Typical measures of cell adhesion in this setup include the rolling and adherent cell density. These measures are functions of not only the cellular adhesivity, but also of the physical features of the experimental system (e.g. inlet cell concentration) and observation time. Here, we present a mathematical model to better analyze experimental data on cell rolling, firm-arrest and transmigration. The overall goal is to quantify the biological adhesivity of cells independent of the physical parameters that control the rate of cell-substrate and cell-cell collision. This analysis yields four independent parameters: Primary capture frequency quantifies the rate at which cells in the free stream initiate rolling. Firm-arrest frequency is a measure of the transition from rolling to firm-binding. These two frequency parameters are inversely proportional to the distance the average cell convects in the free stream adjacent to the substrate before tethering, or rolls on the substrate before firm-adhesion, respectively. Rolling-release frequency is introduced to quantify the reversible release of cells from rolling back into the free stream. Finally, cell-cell capture probability quantifies the fraction of collisions between cells in free stream and recruited substrate-bound cells that result in tethering. The proposed analysis methodology may find application in studies of inflammation, thrombosis and cancer research.

[1]  R. G. Cox,et al.  Slow viscous motion of a sphere parallel to a plane wall , 1967 .

[2]  J. Moake,et al.  Platelets and shear stress. , 1996, Blood.

[3]  T. Springer,et al.  The faster kinetics of L-selectin than of E-selectin and P-selectin rolling at comparable binding strength. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[4]  S I Simon,et al.  Neutrophil CD18-dependent arrest on intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM-1) in shear flow can be activated through L-selectin. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[5]  Joe M. Davis,et al.  Influence of Wall-Retarded Transport on Retention and Plate Height in Field-Flow Fractionation , 1985 .

[6]  Zaverio M. Ruggeri,et al.  Role of 3 Integrins in Melanoma Cell Adhesion to Activated Platelets under Flow (*) , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[7]  Xuan Peng,et al.  Autoantibody Responses in Chinese Hepatocellular Carcinoma , 2002, Journal of Clinical Immunology.

[8]  Sriram Neelamegham,et al.  Estimating the efficiency of cell capture and arrest in flow chambers: study of neutrophil binding via E-selectin and ICAM-1. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[9]  D. Hammer,et al.  Lifetime of the P-selectin-carbohydrate bond and its response to tensile force in hydrodynamic flow , 1995, Nature.

[10]  D. Payan,et al.  Neutrophil rolling altered by inhibition of L-selectin shedding in vitro , 1996, Nature.

[11]  R K Jain,et al.  Analysis of cell flux in the parallel plate flow chamber: implications for cell capture studies. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[12]  D. Hammer,et al.  Lifetime of the P-selectin-carbohydrate bond and its response to tensile force in hydrodynamic flow , 1995, Nature.

[13]  S Neelamegham,et al.  Synergy between L-selectin signaling and chemotactic activation during neutrophil adhesion and transmigration. , 1997, Journal of immunology.

[14]  Sriram Neelamegham,et al.  PPLATE: a computer program for analysis of parallel-plate flow chamber experimental data. , 2003, Journal of immunological methods.

[15]  S Neelamegham,et al.  Modeling the reversible kinetics of neutrophil aggregation under hydrodynamic shear. , 1997, Biophysical journal.