On the successful implementation of mitigation measures

The effectiveness of environmental impact assessment depends largely on fully implementing cost-effective mitigation and other management measures to prevent significant environmental degradation. Follow-up, management systems and monitoring are tools to achieve this. Their role is discussed in relation to a highway in São Paulo State, Brazil. A robust follow-up scheme was the main driver for the successful implementation of mitigation measures. Follow-up costs represented 1.4% of total project costs. Some lessons learned could form recommendations for similar projects: a management system is a powerful tool to implement mitigation and other management measures; checklists and audit protocols can be a practical solution to ‘translate’ the terms and conditions of the environmental license into enforceable, manageable and verifiable rules; external control is essential to guarantee successful implementation of mitigation measures.

[1]  Ross Marshall Developing environmental management systems to deliver mitigation and protect the EIA process during follow up , 2002 .

[2]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Lessons from practice: towards successful follow-up , 2003 .

[3]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Exploring the EIA/Environmental Management Relationship , 1999 .

[4]  Valerie Hobbs,et al.  Environmental auditing: Artificial waterway developments in Western Australia , 1992 .

[5]  Luis Enrique Sánchez,et al.  Environmental impact assessment: evaluating the follow-up phase , 2000 .

[6]  Bronwyn Ridgway THE PROJECT CYCLE AND THE ROLE OF EIA AND EMS , 1999 .

[7]  Luis Enrique Sánchez,et al.  Follow-up of a road building scheme in a fragile environment , 2002 .

[8]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Environmental impact assessment follow-up: good practice and future directions — findings from a workshop at the IAIA 2000 conference , 2001 .

[9]  Bram F. Noble,et al.  Towards increasing the utility of follow-up in Canadian EIA , 2005 .

[10]  Lee Wilson A practical method for environmental impact assessment audits , 1998 .

[11]  Luis Enrique Sánchez Environmental impact assessment in France , 1993 .

[12]  Leonard Ortolano,et al.  Speculations on when and why EIA is effective , 1987 .

[13]  Luis Enrique Sánchez,et al.  An approach to linking environmental impact assessment and environmental management systems , 2001 .

[14]  Leonard Ortolano,et al.  Controls on project proponents and environmental impact assessment effectiveness , 1993 .

[15]  John Bailey,et al.  Environmental Impact Assessment and Management: An Underexplored Relationship , 1997 .

[16]  Angus Morrison-Saunders,et al.  Roles and stakes in environmental impact assessment follow-up , 2001 .

[17]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[18]  Carys Jones,et al.  Auditing the Assessment of the Environmental Impacts of Planning Projects , 2000 .