[Intracoronary Stenting and Angiographic Results Strut Thickness Effect on Restenosis Outcome (ISAR-STEREO) Trial].

BACKGROUND Increased thrombogenicity and smooth muscle cell proliferative response induced by the metal struts compromise the advantages of coronary stenting. The objective of this randomized, multicenter study was to ascertain whether a reduced strut thickness of a stent is associated with improved follow-up angiographic and clinical results. METHODS AND RESULTS The study covered 651 patients with stenosis in the native coronary arteries > 2.8 mm in diameter. They were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 2 commercially available stents of comparable design but different thickness: 326 patients to the thin-strut stent (strut thickness of 50 microm) and 325 patients to the thicker-strut stent (strut thickness of 140 microm). The primary end point was the angiographic restenosis (> or = 50% diameter luminal stenosis at follow-up angiography). The secondary end points were the incidence of reinterventions due to restenosis-induced ischemia and the total rate of death and myocardial infarctions at 1 year (a combined end point). The incidence of angiographic restenosis was 15.0% in the thin-strut group and 25.8% in the thick-strut group (relative risk, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.87; p = 0.003). Clinical restenosis was also significantly reduced. Reinterventions were made in 8.6% of the thin-strut patients and in 13.8% of the thick-strut patients (relative risk, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.99; p = 0.03). No difference was observed in the combined 1-year rate of death and myocardial infarction. CONCLUSIONS The use of a thin-strut device is associated with a significant reduction of angiographic and clinical restenosis after coronary artery stenting. These findings may have relevant implications for the currently most widely used percutaneous coronary intervention.

[1]  D. Baim,et al.  A Predictive Method for Estimating the Late Angiographic Results of Coronary Intervention Despite Incomplete Ascertainment , 1993, Circulation.

[2]  W Rutsch,et al.  A comparison of balloon-expandable-stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. Benestent Study Group. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[3]  P. Teirstein,et al.  A randomized comparison of coronary-stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. Stent Restenosis Study Investigators. , 1994, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  E. Edelman,et al.  Endovascular stent design dictates experimental restenosis and thrombosis. , 1995, Circulation.

[5]  E. Edelman,et al.  Pathobiologic responses to stenting. , 1998, The American journal of cardiology.

[6]  E. Topol,et al.  Frontiers in interventional cardiology. , 1998, Circulation.

[7]  R. Califf,et al.  Complementary clinical benefits of coronary-artery stenting and blockade of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors. Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibition in Stenting Investigators. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  P. Boekstegers,et al.  Influence of balloon pressure during stent placement in native coronary arteries on early and late angiographic and clinical outcome: A randomized evaluation of high-pressure inflation. , 1999, Circulation.

[9]  J. Moses,et al.  Procedural and late outcomes following MULTI-LINK DUET coronary stent deployment. , 1999, The American journal of cardiology.

[10]  E. Edelman,et al.  Stent-versus-stent equivalency trials : are some stents more equal than others? , 1999, Circulation.

[11]  D. Baim,et al.  Impact of end-stage renal disease on clinical and angiographic outcomes after coronary stenting. , 2000, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Coronary stenting plus platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared with tissue plasminogen activator in acute myocardial infarction. Stent versus Thrombolysis for Occluded Coronary Arteries in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Study Investigators. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  P. Boekstegers,et al.  Influence of stent design on 1‐year outcome after coronary stent placement: A randomized comparison of five stent types in 1,147 unselected patients , 2000, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.

[14]  J. Palmaz,et al.  Influence of topography on endothelialization of stents: clues for new designs. , 2000, Journal of long-term effects of medical implants.

[15]  A. Kastrati,et al.  Increased risk of restenosis after placement of gold-coated stents: results of a randomized trial comparing gold-coated with uncoated steel stents in patients with coronary artery disease. , 2000, Circulation.

[16]  M. S. Williams,et al.  Stent and artery geometry determine intimal thickening independent of arterial injury. , 2000, Circulation.

[17]  A Randomized Trial Comparing Stenting With Balloon Angioplasty in Small Vessels in Patients With Symptomatic Coronary Artery Disease , 2000 .

[18]  Larry S. Dean,et al.  Randomized Comparison of GR-II Stent and Palmaz-Schatz Stent for Elective Treatment of Coronary Stenoses , 2000, Circulation.

[19]  K Ulm,et al.  Restenosis after coronary placement of various stent types. , 2001, The American journal of cardiology.