The Shift to Socio-Organizational Drivers of Business Intelligence and Analytics Acceptance

The growing importance of IT in new ways of doing business, bringing with it ever greater empowerment, competencies, and skills of people associated with IT use, reveals that traditional views that individuals decide to accept new or emerging IT mostly based on their effort and performance perceptions or a similar individualistic utilitarian criteria may no longer satisfactorily explain the individual's acceptance behavior. Socio-organizational considerations encompassing normative and behavioral beliefs have so far only been recognized as potential additional predictors of acceptance, moderated, or mediated by certain effects and circumstances, whereas performance perceptions remain the strongest predictor of IS acceptance. The authors' mixed-methods study drives acceptance in the business intelligence and analytics (BI&A) context, comprising literature review, case studies and a survey, which reveals socio-organizational considerations have become more important than individualistic considerations arising from the visibility and recognition of the results of BI&A use in an organization.

[1]  I. D. Faĭnerman.  Process of measurement , 1962 .

[2]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[3]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[4]  Jan-Bernd Lohmöller,et al.  Latent Variable Path Modeling with Partial Least Squares , 1989 .

[5]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[6]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[7]  R. Zmud,et al.  Information technology implementation research: a technological diffusion approach , 1990 .

[8]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Development of an Instrument to Measure the Perceptions of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation , 1991, Inf. Syst. Res..

[9]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  The Nature and Determinants of IT Acceptance, Routinization, and Infusion , 1993, Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology.

[10]  Peter A. Todd,et al.  Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models , 1995, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[12]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  The Role of Innovation Characteristics and Perceived Voluntariness in the Acceptance of Information Technologies , 1997 .

[13]  Dale L. Goodhue,et al.  Development and Measurement Validity of a Task-Technology Fit Instrument for User Evaluations of Inf , 1998 .

[14]  Ritu Agarwal,et al.  Are Individual Differences Germane to the Acceptance of New Information Technologies , 1999 .

[15]  John Hulland,et al.  Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies , 1999 .

[16]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Social Cognitive Theory and Individual Reactions to Computing Technology: A Longitudinal Study , 1999, MIS Q..

[17]  Anol Bhattacherjee,et al.  Understanding Information Systems Continuance: An Expectation-Confirmation Model , 2001, MIS Q..

[18]  Felix B. Tan,et al.  The Repertory Grid Technique: A Method for the Study of Cognition in Information Systems , 2002, MIS Q..

[19]  John Ingham,et al.  Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[20]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[21]  M. Bendel.  The Business Value of Business inTelligence , 2004 .

[22]  Chao-Min Chiu,et al.  Predicting electronic service continuance with a decomposed theory of planned behaviour , 2004, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[23]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Validation Guidelines for IS Positivist Research , 2004, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  A Comprehensive Conceptualization of Post-Adoptive Behaviors Associated with Information Technology Enabled Work Systems , 2005, MIS Q..

[25]  I. Ajzen,et al.  The Influence of Attitudes on Behavior , 2005 .

[26]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  A Practical Guide To Factorial Validity Using PLS-Graph: Tutorial And Annotated Example , 2005, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[27]  Barbara H Wixom,et al.  A Theoretical Integration of User Satisfaction and Technology Acceptance , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[28]  Prashant Palvia,et al.  Testing an extended model of IT acceptance in the Chinese cultural context , 2006, DATB.

[29]  G. Johns.  The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior , 2006 .

[30]  Nancy Williams,et al.  The business value of business intelligence , 2007 .

[31]  Wei Wang,et al.  ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University , 2022 .

[32]  Robert W. Zmud,et al.  Implementation costs of IS-enabled organizational change , 2008, Inf. Organ..

[33]  Thomas F. Stafford,et al.  Consumer acceptance of online auctions: An extension and revision of the TAM , 2008 .

[34]  Barbara Wixom,et al.  Continental Airlines Continues to Soar with Business Intelligence , 2008, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[35]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a Research Agenda on Interventions , 2008, Decis. Sci..

[36]  Jurij Jaklic,et al.  The Impact of Business Intelligence System Maturity on Information Quality , 2009, Inf. Res..

[37]  Rudolf R. Sinkovics,et al.  The Use of Partial Least Squares Path Modeling in International Marketing , 2009 .

[38]  Markus Grünwald,et al.  Business Intelligence , 2009, Informatik-Spektrum.

[39]  Ranjit Bose,et al.  Advanced analytics: opportunities and challenges , 2009, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[40]  Judy E. Scott,et al.  Cognitive engagement with a multimedia ERP training tool: Assessing computer self-efficacy and technology acceptance , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[41]  Sven Laumer,et al.  Who influences whom? Analyzing workplace referents' social influence on IT adoption and non-adoption , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[42]  Peter Trkman,et al.  The impact of business analytics on supply chain performance , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[43]  Kerstin Liehr-Gobbers,et al.  Evaluation of Structural Equation Models Using the Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach , 2010 .

[44]  Stephen Jackson,et al.  Organizational culture and information systems adoption: A three-perspective approach , 2011, Inf. Organ..

[45]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques , 2011, MIS Q..

[46]  Paul Jen-Hwa Hu,et al.  Extending the two‐stage information systems continuance model: incorporating UTAUT predictors and the role of context , 2011, Inf. Syst. J..

[47]  Gi Mun Kim,et al.  IT Capabilities, Process-Oriented Dynamic Capabilities, and Firm Financial Performance , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[48]  Keng Siau,et al.  Impact of Business Intelligence and IT Infrastructure flexibility on Competitive Performance: An Organizational Agility Perspective , 2011, ICIS.

[49]  Tomas Escobar-Rodriguez,et al.  The acceptance of Moodle technology by business administration students , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[50]  Martin Wetzels,et al.  Hierarchical latent variable models in PLS-SEM: guidelines for using reflective-formative type models , 2012 .

[51]  Detmar W. Straub,et al.  Editor's Comments: Use , 2012 .

[52]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Consumer Acceptance and Use of Information Technology: Extending the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, MIS Q..

[53]  Shvetank P. Shah,et al.  Good Data Won't Guarantee Good Decisions , 2012 .

[54]  Aleš Popovič,et al.  Towards business intelligence systems success: Effects of maturity and culture on analytical decision making , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[55]  S. Thompson.  The perils of partnering in developing markets. , 2012, Harvard business review.

[56]  Heshan Sun,et al.  Understanding User Revisions When Using Information Systems Features: Adaptive System Use and Triggers , 2012, MIS Q..

[57]  Veda C. Storey,et al.  Business Intelligence and Analytics: From Big Data to Big Impact , 2012, MIS Q..

[58]  Meng U. Taing,et al.  Recommendations for improving the construct clarity of higher-order multidimensional constructs , 2012 .

[59]  O. A. Sawy,et al.  Digital business strategy: toward a next generation of insights , 2013 .

[60]  Ephraim R. McLean,et al.  Information Systems Success: The Quest for the Independent Variables , 2013, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[61]  Lakshmi Goel,et al.  The Social Component of Information Systems - How Sociability Contributes to Technology Acceptance , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[62]  Mahmoud Al-Dalahmeh,et al.  Data Warehouse Success and Strategic Oriented Business Intelligence: A Theoretical Framework , 2013, ArXiv.

[63]  Anna Sidorova,et al.  Business intelligence success: The roles of BI capabilities and decision environments , 2013, Inf. Manag..

[64]  Daphne G. Taras,et al.  Drivers of context-specific ICT use across work and nonwork domains: A boundary theory perspective , 2013, Inf. Organ..

[65]  Lei Chi,et al.  Understanding Postadoptive Behaviors in Information Systems Use: A Longitudinal Analysis of System Use Problems in the Business Intelligence Context , 2012, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[66]  J. J. Po-An Hsieh,et al.  Motivational Differences Across Post-Acceptance Information System Usage Behaviors: An Investigation in the Business Intelligence Systems Context , 2013, Inf. Syst. Res..

[67]  Dong-Hee Shin,et al.  User experience in social commerce: in friends we trust , 2013, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[68]  Biswadip Ghosh,et al.  User Acceptance of Business Intelligence (BI) Application: Technology, Individual Difference, Social Influence, and Situational Constraints , 2014, 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[69]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Information systems use as strategy practice: A multi-dimensional view of strategic information system implementation and use , 2014, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[70]  L. Razmerita,et al.  Which Factors Influence the Adoption of Social Software? An Exploratory Study of Indian Information Technology Consultancy Firms , 2014 .

[71]  Rajeev Sharma,et al.  Transforming Decision-Making Processes Transforming decision-making processes : a research agenda for understanding the impact of business analytics on organizations , 2017 .

[72]  Gurpreet Dhillon,et al.  A Framework and Guidelines for Context-Specific Theorizing in Information Systems Research , 2014, Inf. Syst. Res..

[73]  Vasant Dhar,et al.  Editorial - Big Data, Data Science, and Analytics: The Opportunity and Challenge for IS Research , 2014, Inf. Syst. Res..

[74]  Ray Hackney,et al.  How information-sharing values influence the use of information systems: An investigation in the business intelligence systems context , 2014, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[75]  Jianping Peng,et al.  Knowledge Sharing, Social Relationships, and Contextual Performance: The Moderating Influence of Information Technology Competence , 2015, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[76]  Peter Buxmann,et al.  An ambidextrous perspective on business intelligence and analytics support in decision processes: Insights from a multiple case study , 2015, Decis. Support Syst..

[77]  Jing Quan,et al.  IT Enabled Organisational Agility: Evidence from Chinese Firms , 2015, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[78]  Tanja Grubljesic,et al.  Business Intelligence Acceptance: The Prominence of Organizational Factors , 2015, Inf. Syst. Manag..

[79]  Yu-Wei Chang,et al.  Exploring managers' intention to use business intelligence: the role of motivations , 2015, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[80]  Prashant Palvia,et al.  Methodological and Topic Trends in Information Systems Research: A Meta-Analysis of IS Journals , 2015, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[81]  Robert Hudson,et al.  How to get the most from a business intelligence application during the post implementation phase? Deep structure transformation at a U.K. retail bank , 2016, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[82]  Xuan Xiao,et al.  The Implications of Social Influence Theory on Continuance Intention for Social Networking Among Chinese University Students , 2016, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[83]  Wenhong Luo.  Responsibility and Skills Requirements for Entry Level Analytics Professionals , 2016, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[84]  Anne P. Massey,et al.  A Multimethod Study of Enterprise Social Media Implementation and Use: Mitigating the Gap between Theory and Practice , 2016, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[85]  Chaoyun Liang,et al.  Influences of Organizational Culture on Knowledge Sharing in an Online Virtual Community: Interactive Effects of Trust, Communication and Leadership , 2016, J. Organ. End User Comput..

[86]  Matthias Lange,et al.  An empirical analysis of the factors and measures of Enterprise Architecture Management success , 2016, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[87]  Robert Vinaja.  Fundamentals of Business Intelligence , 2016 .

[88]  Dong-Hee Shin,et al.  Demystifying big data: Anatomy of big data developmental process , 2016 .

[89]  Van-Hau Trieu,et al.  Getting value from Business Intelligence systems: A review and research agenda , 2017, Decis. Support Syst..