Comparisons of laboratory scale measurements of three-dimensional acoustic propagation with solutions by a parabolic equation model.

In this paper, laboratory scale measurements of long range across-slope acoustic propagation in a three-dimensional (3-D) wedge-like environment are compared to numerical solutions. In a previous work, it was shown that the experimental data contain strong 3-D effects like mode shadow zones and multiple mode arrivals, in qualitative agreement with theoretical and numerical predictions. In the present work, the experimental data are compared with numerical solutions obtained using a fully 3-D parabolic equation based model. A subspace inversion approach is used for the refinement of some of the parameters describing the model experiment. The inversion procedure is implemented in a Bayesian framework based on the exhaustive search over the parameter space. The comparisons are performed both in the time and in the frequency domain using the maximum a posteriori estimates of the refined parameters as input in the 3-D model. A very good quantitative agreement is achieved between the numerical predictions provided by the 3-D parabolic equation model and the experimental data.

[1]  Linus Y. S. Chiu,et al.  Focused sound from three-dimensional sound propagation effects over a submarine canyon. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Didier Ferrand,et al.  Scaled model experiment of long-range across-slope pulse propagation in a penetrable wedge. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE OF HORIZONTAL REFRACTION BY NONLINEAR INTERNAL WAVES OF ELEVATION IN SHALLOW WATER IN THE SOUTH CHINA SEA: 3D VERSUS Nx2D ACOUSTIC PROPAGATION MODELING , 2010 .

[4]  S. Dosso,et al.  Quantifying uncertainty in geoacoustic inversion. II. Application to broadband, shallow-water data. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Christoph F. Mecklenbrauker,et al.  OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS FOR OCEAN ACOUSTIC INVERSION DERIVED BY LIKELIHOOD METHODS , 2000 .

[6]  S. Dosso Quantifying uncertainty in geoacoustic inversion. I. A fast Gibbs sampler approach. , 2002, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J. Lynch,et al.  Horizontal refraction of propagating sound due to seafloor scours over a range-dependent layered bottom on the New Jersey shelf. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  J. Fawcett Modeling three‐dimensional propagation in an oceanic wedge using parabolic equation methods , 1993 .

[9]  Frédéric Sturm,et al.  Numerical study of broadband sound pulse propagation in three-dimensional oceanic waveguides , 2005 .

[10]  THREE-DIMENSIONAL ACOUSTIC SIMULATION OF AN ACOUSTIC REFRACTION BY A NONLINEAR INTERNAL WAVE IN A WEDGE BATHYMETRY , 2010 .

[11]  A. Korakas,et al.  On the Feasibility of a Matched-Field Inversion in a Three-Dimensional Oceanic Environment Ignoring Out-of-Plane Propagation , 2011, IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering.

[12]  M. Buckingham Theory of three-dimensional acoustic propagation in a wedgelike ocean with a penetrable bottom , 1987 .

[13]  M. Ballard,et al.  Modeling three-dimensional propagation in a continental shelf environment. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  C. T. Tindle,et al.  IMPROVED EQUIVALENT FLUID APPROXIMATIONS FOR A LOW SHEAR SPEED OCEAN BOTTOM , 1995 .

[15]  Ying-Tsong Lin,et al.  Three‐dimensional wide‐angle azimuthal PE solution to modified benchmark problems , 2004 .

[16]  C. Mecklenbräuker,et al.  OBJECTIVE FUNCTIONS FOR OCEAN ACOUSTIC INVERSION DERIVED BY LIKELIHOOD METHODS , 1998 .

[17]  J. Lynch,et al.  Analytical study of the horizontal ducting of sound by an oceanic front over a slope. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  PECAN: A CANADIAN PARABOLIC EQUATION MODEL FOR UNDERWATER SOUND PROPAGATION , 2001 .

[19]  C. Harrison Acoustic shadow zones in the horizontal plane , 1979 .

[20]  P. Gerstoft,et al.  Ocean acoustic inversion with estimation of a posteriori probability distributions , 1998 .

[21]  N. Ross Chapman,et al.  THE USE OF TESSELLATION IN THREE-DIMENSIONAL PARABOLIC EQUATION MODELING , 2011 .

[22]  Frédéric Sturm Investigation of 3D benchmark problems in underwater acoustics: a uniform approach , 2008 .

[23]  George S. K. Wong,et al.  Speed of sound in pure water as a function of temperature , 1993 .

[24]  Gordon R. Ebbeson,et al.  PECan: A Canadian Parabolic Equation Model for Underwater Sound Propagation , .

[25]  Scaled Laboratory Experiments of Shallow Water Acoustic Propagation : Calibration Phase , 2008 .

[26]  Kevin D Heaney,et al.  Measurements of three-dimensional propagation in a continental shelf environment. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  J. Collis,et al.  Elastic Pekeris waveguide normal mode solution comparisons against laboratory data. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  M. D. Collins,et al.  Comparison of simulations and data from a seismo-acoustic tank experiment. , 2007, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  Mrinal K. Sen,et al.  Bayesian inference, Gibbs' sampler and uncertainty estimation in geophysical inversion , 1996 .

[30]  A. Tolstoy 3-D PROPAGATION ISSUES AND MODELS , 1996 .

[31]  T. Duda,et al.  A higher-order split-step Fourier parabolic-equation sound propagation solution scheme. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.