The Limits of Planning: Niklas Luhmann's Systems Theory and the Analysis of Planning and Planning Ambitions

In this article, we argue that Niklas Luhmann has a lot to offer present-day planning theory. Until now, planning theory has been engaged with Luhmann's work only minimally. Convinced of its potential, we want to show how Luhmann's systems theory offers fresh insight into both limits and possibilities of planning in contemporary society. We argue that Luhmann's understanding of society as functionally differentiated into self-referentially closed subsystems (politics, economy, law, science, etc.) creates space for a complex and subtle analysis of planning practice. In particular, we look at the role of planning within an autopoietic account of society, and its ability to steer other social subsystems. Planning is seen as the form of steering aiming to coordinate processes of spatial organization, therefore an activity dealing with steering problems. We illustrate key concepts of the systems theory in brief analyses of planning situations and interpret these situations using the systems theoretical framework. The analyses center around the questions of planning's steering capacity and the role of the planner, thus creating linkages with mainstream discussions in planning theory.

[1]  P. Healey.  Collaborative Planning: Shaping Places in Fragmented Societies , 1997 .

[2]  Martin Gren,et al.  The Unity of Difference: A Critical Appraisal of Niklas Luhmann's Theory of Social Systems in the Context of Corporeality and Spatiality , 2003 .

[3]  Andreas Faludi,et al.  Rule and Order, Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century , 1994 .

[4]  R. Platt,et al.  Land use and society , 2004 .

[5]  Jean Hillier,et al.  Shadows of Power: An Allegory of Prudence in Land-Use Planning , 2002 .

[6]  John Mingers,et al.  Law as an Autopoietic System , 1995 .

[7]  J. Innes,et al.  Consensus Building as Role Playing and Bricolage , 2007 .

[8]  J. Mingers,et al.  Self-Producing Systems: Implications and Applications of Autopoiesis , 1996 .

[9]  N. Luhmann.  Political Theory In The Welfare State , 1990 .

[10]  G. Verschraegen.  Human Rights and Modern Society: A Sociological Analysis from the Perspective of Systems Theory , 2002, Luhmann and Law.

[11]  A. Benjamin Handler,et al.  What is Planning Theory , 1957 .

[12]  N. Luhmann.  Das Recht der Gesellschaft , 1993 .

[13]  William Rasch,et al.  Observing Complexity: Systems Theory and Postmodernity , 2000 .

[14]  D. Dennis,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1998 .

[15]  Angelique Chettiparamb,et al.  Metaphors in Complexity Theory and Planning , 2006 .

[16]  J. Innes,et al.  Consensus Building as Role Playing and Bricolage: Toward a Theory of Collaborative Planning , 1999 .

[17]  Simon Calmar Andersen,et al.  How to Improve the Outcome of State Welfare Services. Governance in A Systems-Theoretical Perspective , 2005 .

[18]  James C. Scott,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 1999 .

[19]  R. Laermans,et al.  “The Late Niklas Luhmann” on Religion: An Overview , 2001 .

[20]  N. Luhmann,et al.  The Concept of Society , 1992 .

[21]  S. Harrison.  Rationality and Power: Democracy in Practice , 2001 .

[22]  Paul Bourgine,et al.  Autopoiesis and Cognition , 2004, Artificial Life.

[23]  T. Hernes,et al.  Autopoietic organization theory : drawing on Niklas Luhmann's social systems perspective , 2003 .

[24]  Postmodern Public Policy , 2002 .

[25]  P. Allen.  Cities and Regions as Self-Organizing Systems: Models of Complexity , 1997 .

[26]  M. Crozier,et al.  Le phenomene bureaucratique , 1965 .

[27]  N. Luhmann.  Beiträge zur funktionalen Differenzierung der Gesellschaft , 2005 .

[28]  Richard O. Mason,et al.  Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed , 2000, Inf. Soc..

[29]  N. Luhmann,et al.  Limits of Steering , 1997 .

[30]  M. Brans,et al.  The autopoiesis of administrative systems: Niklas Luhmann on public administration and public policy , 1997 .

[31]  M. King,et al.  Niklas Luhmann's theory of politics and law , 2003 .

[32]  John Beattie Paterson,et al.  Changing Maps: Empirical Legal Autopoiesis , 1998 .

[33]  M. King,et al.  The Ambitious Modesty of Niklas Luhmann , 1994 .

[34]  CLAUS OFFE,et al.  Die Wirtschaft der Gesellschaft , 1990 .

[35]  David Byrne,et al.  Complexity Theory and Planning Theory: A Necessary Encounter , 2003 .

[36]  Niklas Luhmann,et al.  Die Wissenschaft Der Gesellschaft , 1992 .

[37]  M. King.  A sociology of jurisprudence , 2006 .

[38]  Judith E. Innes,et al.  Group Processes and the Social Construction of Growth Management: Florida, Vermont, and New Jersey , 1992 .