Effect of refined soy oil or whole soybeans on intake, methane output, and performance of young bulls.

An experiment was conducted to establish the effects of feeding refined soy oil (RSO) or whole soybeans (WSB) containing soy oil on DMI, animal performance, and enteric methane (CH4) emissions in young bulls. Thirty-six Charolais and Limousin cross-bred, young beef bulls (338 +/- 27 kg of BW, 218 +/- 17 d of age at the beginning of the experiment) were blocked by BW, age, and breed before being assigned in a randomized complete block design to 1 of 3 experimental treatments (n = 12). The experimental period lasted for 103 d, with enteric CH4 output recorded for 2 periods of 5 consecutive days on d 37 to 41 and d 79 to 83. The 3 dietary treatments consisted of a barley/soybean meal-based concentrate with 0 g/d of RSO; oil from WSB as 6% of DMI (WSB treatment); and oil from RSO as 6% of DMI (RSO treatment). Each diet had a 10:90 forage:concentrate ratio, using barley straw as the forage source. Diet affected DMI (P < or = 0.001) and GE intake (P < 0.05 during the CH4 measurement periods), with the WSB treatment producing the lowest values. The addition of WSB decreased ADG (P < 0.05) compared with the RSO treatment. The WSB treatment also decreased (P < 0.05) average daily carcass gain (ADCG). Both the RSO and WSB concentrates decreased (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001) daily enteric CH4 output when expressed in terms of liters per day, liters per kilogram of DMI, percentage of GE intake, liters per kilogram of ADG, and liters per kilogram of ADCG. Diet had no effect (P = 0.557) on ruminal protozoal numbers. The reductions in enteric CH4 were achieved at relatively high oil inclusion levels. Such oil levels have previously been reported to decrease DMI of high-forage diets, although no effect on DMI was noted with the low-forage diets fed in this experiment. This impact on DMI of high-forage diets may limit the range of diets for which this CH4 reduction strategy may be applicable. The inclusion level of WSB in the current experiment (27%) was beyond the palatability threshold of the bulls used and resulted in a marked decline in intake and performance. Therefore, WSB may have a role to play in ruminant diets, but only at a reduced inclusion rate.

[1]  M. G. Porter,et al.  The volatility of components of grass silage on oven drying and the inter‐relationship between dry‐matter content estimated by different analytical methods , 2001 .

[2]  B. Lamb,et al.  Measurement of methane emissions from ruminant livestock using a sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. , 1994, Environmental science & technology.

[3]  J. Peter,et al.  Collaborative Study of Acid-Detergent Fiber and Lignin , 1973 .

[4]  M. Keane.  Beef production from Holstein–Friesian bulls and steers of New Zealand and European/American descent, and Belgian Blue×Holstein–Friesians, slaughtered at two weights , 2003 .

[5]  M. G. Porter.  Comparison of sample preparation methods for the determination of the gross energy concentration of fresh silage , 1992 .

[6]  F. Dohme,et al.  The role of the rumen ciliate protozoa for methane suppression caused by coconut oil , 1999 .

[7]  Michael Kreuzer,et al.  Comparative evaluation of the effects of coconut oil, oilseeds and crystalline fat on methane release, digestion and energy balance in lambs , 2000 .

[8]  M. Kerley,et al.  Performance and carcass quality of steers fed whole raw soybeans at increasing inclusion levels. , 2004, Journal of animal science.

[9]  M. Kreuzer,et al.  Potential of various fatty feeds to reduce methane release from rumen fermentation in vitro (Rusitec) , 1998 .

[10]  P. Mcdonald,et al.  The buffering constituents of herbage and of silage , 1966 .

[11]  W. Horwitz.  Official Methods of Analysis , 1980 .

[12]  D. Stahl,et al.  Taxon‐specific associations between protozoal and methanogen populations in the rumen and a model rumen system , 1998 .

[13]  P. V. Soest,et al.  Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. , 1991, Journal of dairy science.

[14]  C. Henderson.  The effects of fatty acids on pure cultures of rumen bacteria , 1973, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[15]  D. K. Lovett,et al.  Effect of refined coconut oil or copra meal on methane output and on intake and performance of beef heifers. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[16]  K. J. Clarke,et al.  Some rumen ciliates have endosymbiotic methanogens. , 1994, FEMS microbiology letters.

[17]  D. Demeyer,et al.  Effect of soya oil hydrolysate on rumen digestion in defaunated and refaunated sheep , 1990 .

[18]  D. K. Lovett,et al.  Effect of forage/concentrate ratio and dietary coconut oil level on methane output and performance of finishing beef heifers , 2003 .

[19]  M. Kreuzer,et al.  Effect of coconut oil and defaunation treatment on methanogenesis in sheep. , 2003, Reproduction, nutrition, development.

[20]  F W Wainman,et al.  The metabolism of oleic, linoleic and linolenic acids by sheep with reference to their effects on methane production , 1966, British Journal of Nutrition.

[21]  R. Bessa,et al.  Effect of particle size and soybean oil supplementation on growth performance, carcass and meat quality and fatty acid composition of intramuscular lipids of lambs , 2004 .

[22]  M. Kreuzer,et al.  Comparative evaluation of rumen‐protected fat, coconut oil and various oilseeds supplemented to fattening bulls , 2000, Archiv fur Tierernahrung.

[23]  J. Sutton,et al.  Digestion and synthesis in the rumen of sheep given diets supplemented with free and protected oils , 1983, British Journal of Nutrition.