LOS Classification of UAV-to-Ground Links in Built-Up Areas

The use of UAVs for various applications is a rapidly growing research field nowadays. Knowledge of the wireless UAV-to-ground propagation channel is crucial for designing an efficient communication system and for evaluating its performance. The presence of LOS is essential for radio network planning and RF coverage prediction. Built-up areas contain a mixture of LOS and NLOS conditions due to buildings shadowing, states which cannot be easily distinguishable. Hence ray-tracing simulations were performed to model the UAV trajectory, the site-specific urban environment and terrain. In this contribution we develop a method to identify the LOS and the NLOS conditions based on the NB and WB channel statistical parameters: received power, K-factor, mean ToA and delay spread, and their combinations. Population classifications using a single feature and multiple features were investigated. We found that a classification between LOS and NLOS populations based on a single feature leads to poor to moderate performances depending on the feature. However, combing a few features improved the classification performance. Variances of KNN, decision tree and SVM classifiers were trained based on all features, resulting in good true positive and true negative rates of 87% and 75%, respectively.

[1]  Daniel Cygan,et al.  The land mobile satellite communication channel-recording, statistics, and channel model , 1991 .

[2]  Philip Constantinou,et al.  City center high-elevation angle propagation measurements at L band for land mobile satellite systems , 1998 .

[3]  Sneha A. Dalvi,et al.  Internet of Things for Smart Cities , 2017 .

[4]  E. Ogawa,et al.  Propagation Path Visibility Estimation for Radio Local Distribution Systems in Built-Up Areas , 1986, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[5]  Andrew R. Nix,et al.  WLCp2-06: Modelling the Likelihood of Line-of-Sight for Air-to-Ground Radio Propagation in Urban Environments , 2006, IEEE Globecom 2006.

[6]  Andrew R. Nix,et al.  Path Loss Models for Air-to-Ground Radio Channels in Urban Environments , 2006, 2006 IEEE 63rd Vehicular Technology Conference.

[7]  W. Wiesbeck,et al.  Capability of 3-D Ray Tracing for Defining Parameter Sets for the Specification of Future Mobile Communications Systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.

[8]  Barry G. Evans,et al.  Physical-statistical methods for determining state transition probabilities in mobile-satellite channel models , 2001, Int. J. Satell. Commun. Netw..

[9]  Karina Mabell Gomez,et al.  Aerial-terrestrial communications: terrestrial cooperation and energy-efficient transmissions to aerial base stations , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[10]  R.C. Palat,et al.  Cooperative relaying for ad-hoc ground networks using swarm UAVs , 2005, MILCOM 2005 - 2005 IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[11]  Fernando Perez Fontan,et al.  Modelling the Wireless Propagation Channel: A simulation approach with MATLAB , 2008 .

[12]  D. W. Matolak,et al.  Air-ground channels & models: Comprehensive review and considerations for unmanned aircraft systems , 2012, 2012 IEEE Aerospace Conference.

[13]  Barry G. Evans,et al.  Physical model of shadowing probability for land mobile satellite propagation , 1996 .

[14]  Abbas Jamalipour,et al.  Modeling air-to-ground path loss for low altitude platforms in urban environments , 2014, 2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference.

[15]  Maria Angeles Vázquez-Castro,et al.  Statistical modeling of the LMS channel , 2001, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol..

[16]  Trevor Hastie,et al.  An Introduction to Statistical Learning , 2013, Springer Texts in Statistics.

[17]  P. Pechac,et al.  Elevation Dependent Shadowing Model for Mobile Communications via High Altitude Platforms in Built-Up Areas , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation.