Does Preoperative Sinus Rhythm Influence Surgical Ablation's Perioperative Safety in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation?

BACKGROUND Despite excellent data on lowering long-term stroke and all-cause mortality rates, currently, only 25-40% of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients undergo simultaneous surgical ablation therapy (SA) during cardiac surgery. Surgeon's fear exposing their patients to an additional, unjustified, and disproportionate risk when performing SA in AF patients presenting with sinus rhythm (SR) before surgery. To clarify the influence of preoperative SR before SA for AF, we conducted a subgroup analysis of the German Cardiosurgical Atrial Fibrillation (CASE-AF) register. METHODS Between September 2016 and August 2020, 964 AF patients with an underlying cardiac disease were scheduled for surgery with SA and enrolled in the CASE-AF register. Data prospectively were collected and analyzed retrospectively. We divided the entire cohort into an SR-group (38.2%, N = 368) and an AF-group (61.8%, N = 596), based on preoperative heart rhythm. RESULTS Over half of the patients were moderately affected by their AF, with no difference between the groups (European Heart Rhythm Association class ≥IIb: SR-group 54.2% versus AF-group 58.5%, P = .238). The AF-group had a higher preoperative EuroSCORE II (4.8 ± 8.0% versus 4.2 ± 6.3%, P = .014). In-hospital mortality (SR-group 0.8% versus AF-group 1.7%, P = .261), major perioperative adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (SR-group 2.7% versus AF-group 3.5%, P = .500), and the new pacemaker implantation rate (SR-group 6.0% versus AF-group 5.9%, P = .939) were low and showed and no group difference. Logistic regression analysis showed a protective effect for preoperative SR to perioperative complications in AF patients undergoing SA (odds ratio (OR) 0.72 (95% CI 0.52 - 0.998); P = .0485). CONCLUSIONS Concomitant SA in AF patients presenting in SR before cardiac surgery is safe, has a low perioperative risk profile, and should be carried out with almost no exceptions.

[1]  J. Brachmann,et al.  The impact of basic atrial rhythm during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation on clinical outcomes: Lessons from the German Ablation Registry , 2021, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[2]  J. Brachmann,et al.  Safety and patient-reported outcomes in index ablation versus repeat ablation in atrial fibrillation: insights from the German Ablation Registry , 2020, Clinical Research in Cardiology.

[3]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). , 2020, European heart journal.

[4]  J. Brachmann,et al.  Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Hypertension—An Analysis from the German Ablation Registry , 2020, Journal of clinical medicine.

[5]  P. McCarthy,et al.  Concomitant atrial fibrillation ablation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass and cardiac valve surgery , 2020, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[6]  P. McCarthy,et al.  Prevalence of atrial fibrillation before cardiac surgery and factors associated with concomitant ablation. , 2020, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[7]  M. Morice,et al.  Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Andrew S. Mugglin,et al.  Transcatheter Aortic‐Valve Replacement with a Self‐Expanding Valve in Low‐Risk Patients , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  Hugh Calkins,et al.  2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2019, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  D. Malenka,et al.  Surgical Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Improves Long-Term Survival: A Multicenter Analysis. , 2019, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[11]  P. McCarthy,et al.  The Maze Procedure and Postoperative Pacemakers. , 2018, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  J. Piccini,et al.  Association Between Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion and Readmission for Thromboembolism Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Undergoing Concomitant Cardiac Surgery , 2018, JAMA.

[13]  R. Damiano,et al.  Performance of the Cox‐maze IV procedure is associated with improved long‐term survival in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery , 2018, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[14]  R. Damiano,et al.  Surgical Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation in the United States: Trends and Propensity Matched Outcomes. , 2017, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  H. Miyata,et al.  Prolonged Cross-Clamping During Aortic Valve Replacement Is an Independent Predictor of Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality: Analysis of the Japan Cardiovascular Surgery Database. , 2017, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[16]  S. Bolling,et al.  The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2017 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation. , 2017, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  J. Hartikainen,et al.  Percutaneous coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass grafting in treatment of unprotected left main stenosis (NOBLE): a prospective, randomised, open-label, non-inferiority trial , 2016, The Lancet.

[18]  S. Pocock,et al.  Everolimus-Eluting Stents or Bypass Surgery for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  K. Phan,et al.  Surgical left atrial appendage occlusion during cardiac surgery for patients with atrial fibrillation: a meta-analysis. , 2015, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[20]  N. Geller,et al.  Surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation during mitral-valve surgery. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  H. Alkadhi,et al.  Safe, effective and durable epicardial left atrial appendage clip occlusion in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery: first long-term results from a prospective device trial. , 2014, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[22]  P. McCarthy,et al.  Should paroxysmal atrial fibrillation be treated during cardiac surgery? , 2013, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[23]  Sanghamitra Mohanty,et al.  Does the left atrial appendage morphology correlate with the risk of stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation? Results from a multicenter study. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[24]  M. Vaduganathan,et al.  Midterm survival in patients treated for atrial fibrillation: a propensity-matched comparison to patients without a history of atrial fibrillation. , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[25]  R. Bonow,et al.  Atrial fibrillation ablation in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. , 2012, The Journal of heart valve disease.

[26]  S. Hunt,et al.  Do we increase the operative risk by adding the Cox Maze III procedure to aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass surgery? , 2012, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[27]  M. Maruthappu,et al.  What size of left atrium significantly impairs the success of maze surgery for atrial fibrillation? , 2011, Interactive cardiovascular and thoracic surgery.

[28]  Antonio Colombo,et al.  Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary-artery bypass grafting for severe coronary artery disease. , 2009, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  G. Merli,et al.  Cardiopulmonary bypass duration is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality after cardiac surgery. , 2008, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[30]  H. Wellens,et al.  Predictive factors of sustained sinus rhythm and recurrent atrial fibrillation after a radiofrequency modified Maze procedure. , 2008, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[31]  E. Blackstone,et al.  Success of surgical left atrial appendage closure: assessment by transesophageal echocardiography. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[32]  T. Ngarmukos,et al.  Predictors of Sinus Rhythm after Radiofrequency Maze and Mitral Valve Surgery , 2008, Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals.

[33]  Jeevanantham Rajeswaran,et al.  Surgery for permanent atrial fibrillation: impact of patient factors and lesion set. , 2006, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[34]  Hsueh-Wen Chang,et al.  Preoperative atrial size predicts the success of radiofrequency maze procedure for permanent atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing concomitant valvular surgery. , 2004, Chest.

[35]  J. Nielsen,et al.  A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  G. Lamas,et al.  Adverse Effect of Ventricular Pacing on Heart Failure and Atrial Fibrillation Among Patients With Normal Baseline QRS Duration in a Clinical Trial of Pacemaker Therapy for Sinus Node Dysfunction , 2003, Circulation.

[37]  David O. Martin,et al.  Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. , 2002, JAMA.

[38]  J. Cox,et al.  Impact of the maze procedure on the stroke rate in patients with atrial fibrillation. , 1999, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[39]  J. Boineau,et al.  Five-year experience with the maze procedure for atrial fibrillation. , 1993, The Annals of thoracic surgery.