Understanding of Dynamic Contacting Behaviors of Underwater Gas Bubbles on Solid Surfaces.

Understanding of dynamic behaviors of gas bubbles on solid surfaces has significant impacts on gas-involving electrochemical reactions, mineral flotation and so on in industry. Contact angle (θ) is widely employed to characterize the wetting behaviors of bubbles on solid surfaces; however, it usually fluctuates within the bubble's advancing (θa) and receding (θr) range. Although the term of most-stable contact angle (θms) was defined previously as the closest valuable approximation for thermodynamically meaningful contact angle for a droplet on solid surface, it has not been widely appreciated; and the precise θms measurement methods are inadequate to describe bubbles' wetting behaviors on solid surfaces. Herein, we proposed to take θms as the mean value of θa and θr, as a more accurate descriptor of gas bubbles' dynamic behaviors on non-ideal solid surface, as similar to the definition of droplets' θms on solid surfaces. The feasibility and accuracy of the proposed θms have been evidenced by recording the bubbles' contacting behaviors on solid surfaces with varied wettabilities. In addition, it was found that the contact angle hysteresis (δ), as the difference between θa and θr, reached its maximum value when θms approached to 90°, regardless of the roughness (r) of substrates. Finally, built on the above concept, lateral adhesion force (ƒ) of gas bubble on solid interface, which worked on the three-phase contact line (TPCL) of individual bubble on a solid surface against its lateral motion during the bubble advancing or receding process, was described quantitatively by combining θa, θr and liquid-gas interfacial tension (γlg). Experimental and theoretical data jointly confirmed that ƒ reached its maximum value at θms~90°, namely the "super-sticky" state, which described the dynamically most sluggish movement of bubble along the solid surface.

[1]  Chang‐Hwan Choi,et al.  Generalized models for advancing and receding contact angles of fakir droplets on pillared and pored surfaces. , 2019, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[2]  J. Drelich Contact angles: From past mistakes to new developments through liquid-solid adhesion measurements. , 2019, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[3]  R. Ras,et al.  Surface-wetting characterization using contact-angle measurements , 2018, Nature Protocols.

[4]  Lei Jiang,et al.  Superwetting Electrodes for Gas-Involving Electrocatalysis. , 2018, Accounts of chemical research.

[5]  H. Roshan,et al.  Current understanding of shale wettability: A review on contact angle measurements , 2018, Earth-Science Reviews.

[6]  Zhiyuan He,et al.  Bioinspired Materials for Controlling Ice Nucleation, Growth, and Recrystallization. , 2018, Accounts of chemical research.

[7]  Biao Zhou,et al.  Comparisons and validations of contact angle models , 2018 .

[8]  Ke R. Yang,et al.  Nitrogen-doped tungsten carbide nanoarray as an efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for water splitting in acid , 2018, Nature Communications.

[9]  Qunyang Li,et al.  Friction of Droplets Sliding on Microstructured Superhydrophobic Surfaces. , 2017, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[10]  Doris Vollmer,et al.  How drops start sliding over solid surfaces , 2017, Nature Physics.

[11]  X. Hou,et al.  Bioinspired Design of Underwater Superaerophobic and Superaerophilic Surfaces by Femtosecond Laser Ablation for Anti- or Capturing Bubbles. , 2017, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[12]  Peipei Zhang,et al.  Superwettability of Gas Bubbles and Its Application: From Bioinspiration to Advanced Materials , 2017, Advanced materials.

[13]  Mingjie Liu,et al.  Nature-inspired superwettability systems , 2017 .

[14]  S. Siboni,et al.  Contact angles and wettability: towards common and accurate terminology , 2017 .

[15]  Lei Jiang,et al.  Superaerophilic Carbon‐Nanotube‐Array Electrode for High‐Performance Oxygen Reduction Reaction , 2016, Advanced materials.

[16]  A. Parmigiani,et al.  Bubble accumulation and its role in the evolution of magma reservoirs in the upper crust , 2016, Nature.

[17]  T. Fuller,et al.  Hierarchically Structured Nanomaterials for Electrochemical Energy Conversion. , 2016, Angewandte Chemie.

[18]  Lei Jiang,et al.  Bioinspired Surfaces with Superwettability: New Insight on Theory, Design, and Applications. , 2015, Chemical reviews.

[19]  Lei Jiang,et al.  Superwetting Surfaces under Different Media: Effects of Surface Topography on Wettability. , 2015, Small.

[20]  Ye Tian,et al.  Bioinspired super-wettability from fundamental research to practical applications. , 2015, Angewandte Chemie.

[21]  F. Gaillard,et al.  Transport of metals and sulphur in magmas by flotation of sulphide melt on vapour bubbles , 2015 .

[22]  Hao Wang,et al.  Ultrahigh Hydrogen Evolution Performance of Under‐Water “Superaerophobic” MoS2 Nanostructured Electrodes , 2014, Advanced materials.

[23]  M. Cabrerizo-Vílchez,et al.  Equilibrium contact angle or the most-stable contact angle? , 2014, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[24]  H. B. Eral,et al.  Contact angle hysteresis: a review of fundamentals and applications , 2013, Colloid and Polymer Science.

[25]  E. Bormashenko Wetting of real solid surfaces: new glance on well-known problems , 2013, Colloid and Polymer Science.

[26]  H. Butt,et al.  Dynamic measurement of the force required to move a liquid drop on a solid surface. , 2012, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[27]  A. Jacobi,et al.  Equilibrium contact angles of liquid droplets on ideal rough solids. , 2011, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[28]  K. Yasuoka,et al.  Measurement of contact-angle hysteresis for droplets on nanopillared surface and in the Cassie and Wenzel states: a molecular dynamics simulation study. , 2011, ACS nano.

[29]  A. Neumann,et al.  Methodology for high accuracy contact angle measurement. , 2009, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[30]  E. Chibowski On some relations between advancing, receding and Young's contact angles. , 2007, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[31]  Lichao Gao,et al.  Contact angle hysteresis explained. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[32]  E. Chibowski,et al.  On the interpretation of contact angle hysteresis , 2002 .

[33]  Lei Jiang,et al.  Contact angle measurement of natural materials. , 2018, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[34]  T. Lee,et al.  Contact Angle and Wetting Properties , 2013 .

[35]  T. Young III. An essay on the cohesion of fluids , 1805, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.