Inferring the interpretation of attributive and referential definite descriptions

Three experiments are presented that investigate how people understand definite descriptions, such as The woman who can sing this song will get the job. The woman may refer to a specific woman, the referential use, or it may refer to any woman who fills the description who can sing this song, the attributive use. Experiment 1 showed that people can readily distinguish between the referential and attributive uses of definite descriptions in various discourse situations. Experiment 2 used a probe‐recognition task to assess the anaphoric inferences needed to interpret attributive and referential descriptions. The results showed that referential descriptions activate their explicit antecedents, whereas attributive descriptions activate an unspecified member of a class of objects or persons. In Experiment 3, subjects read stories ending with definite descriptions referring to famous people, such as The Prime Minister of England has a rough job. No search was required to understand attributive descriptions beca...

[1]  D. E. Over,et al.  Constructivity and the referential/attributive distinction , 1985 .

[2]  RAYMOND W. GIBBS,et al.  Literal Meaning and Psychological Theory , 1984, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  W. V. Quine.  Quantifiers and Propositional Attitudes , 1956 .

[4]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .

[5]  R. Gibbs.  Do people always process the literal meanings of indirect requests , 1983 .

[6]  G. Frege.  On Sense and Reference , 1948 .

[7]  F. R. Chang.  Active memory processes in visual sentence comprehension: Clause effects and pronominal reference , 1980, Memory & cognition.

[8]  Raymond W. Gibbs,et al.  Contextual effects in understanding indirect requests , 1979 .

[9]  H. H. Clark,et al.  In search of referents for nouns and pronouns , 1979 .

[10]  On the origins of referential opacity , 1978 .

[11]  Keith S. Donnellan.  Putting Humpty Dumpty Together Again , 1968 .

[12]  J. Searle.  Expression and Meaning: Studies in the Theory of Speech Acts , 1979 .

[13]  P. Strawson.  III.—ON REFERRING , 1950 .

[14]  M. Gernsbacher.  Mechanisms that improve referential access , 1989, Cognition.

[15]  R. Gibbs,et al.  Comprehending figurative referential descriptions. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  Albert T. Corbett,et al.  Pronoun disambiguation: Accessing potential antecedents , 1983, Memory & cognition.

[17]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  The comprehension processes and memory structures involved in anaphoric reference , 1980 .

[18]  Saul A. Kripke,et al.  Naming and Necessity , 1980 .

[19]  P. Johnson-Laird,et al.  Descriptions and discourse models , 1980 .

[20]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  Definite descriptions and semantic memory , 1977 .

[21]  E. J. O'Brien,et al.  Anaphoric inference during reading. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[22]  R. Ratcliff,et al.  The activation of antecedent information during the processing of anaphoric reference in reading. , 1983 .

[23]  H. H. Clark,et al.  What's new? Acquiring New information as a process in comprehension , 1974 .

[24]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Comprehension of Anaphoric Pronouns. , 1977 .

[25]  H. H. Clark.  The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. , 1973 .

[26]  Keith S. Donnellan.  Reference and Definite Descriptions , 1966 .

[27]  Psycholinguistic aspects of pragmatics and semantics , 1990 .

[28]  James D. McCawley,et al.  Where do noun phrases come from , 1969 .

[29]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .