Design and Validation of a New Morphing Camber System by Testing in the Price—Païdoussis Subsonic Wind Tunnel

This paper presents the design and wind tunnel testing of a morphing camber system and an estimation of performances on an unmanned aerial vehicle. The morphing camber system is a combination of two subsystems: the morphing trailing edge and the morphing leading edge. Results of the present study show that the aerodynamics effects of the two subsystems are combined, without interfering with each other on the wing. The morphing camber system acts only on the lift coefficient at a 0° angle of attack when morphing the trailing edge, and only on the stall angle when morphing the leading edge. The behavior of the aerodynamics performances from the MTE and the MLE should allow individual control of the morphing camber trailing and leading edges. The estimation of the performances of the morphing camber on an unmanned aerial vehicle indicates that the morphing of the camber allows a drag reduction. This result is due to the smaller angle of attack needed for an unmanned aerial vehicle equipped with the morphing camber system than an unmanned aerial vehicle equipped with classical aileron. In the case study, the morphing camber system was found to allow a reduction of the drag when the lift coefficient was higher than 0.48.

[1]  R. Botez,et al.  Experimental validation of a new morphing trailing edge system using Price – Païdoussis wind tunnel tests , 2019, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics.

[2]  Ruxandra Botez,et al.  Numerical simulation and wind tunnel tests investigation and validation of a morphing wing-tip demonstrator aerodynamic performance , 2016 .

[3]  Onur Bilgen,et al.  Wind tunnel testing of the fish bone active camber morphing concept , 2014 .

[4]  Daniel J. Inman,et al.  A Review of Morphing Aircraft , 2011 .

[5]  Ruxandra Botez,et al.  Numerical and experimental validation of a morphed wing geometry using Price-Païdoussis wind-tunnel testing* , 2016, The Aeronautical Journal.

[6]  Shaker A. Meguid,et al.  Shape morphing of aircraft wing: Status and challenges , 2010 .

[7]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Analysis and experimental validation of morphing UAV wings , 2018 .

[8]  Ruxandra Botez,et al.  Drag optimisation of a wing equipped with a morphing upper surface , 2016, The Aeronautical Journal.

[9]  Terrence A. Weisshaar,et al.  Morphing Aircraft Systems: Historical Perspectives and Future Challenges , 2013 .

[10]  Application of the finite element method to aeroelasticity , 1999 .

[11]  Ruxandra Botez,et al.  Real Time Morphing Wing Optimization Validation Using Wind-Tunnel Tests , 2010 .

[12]  Ruxandra Botez,et al.  New Methodology for Wind Tunnel Calibration Using Neural Networks - EGD Approach , 2013 .

[13]  Farhan Gandhi,et al.  Skin design studies for variable camber morphing airfoils , 2008 .

[14]  R. Botez,et al.  Modeling novel methodologies for unmanned aerial systems – Applications to the UAS-S4 Ehecatl and the UAS-S45 Bálaam , 2019, Chinese Journal of Aeronautics.

[15]  Ruxandra Botez,et al.  Design and wind tunnel experimental validation of a controlled new rotary actuation system for a morphing wing application , 2016 .

[16]  Antonio Concilio,et al.  Design and Functional Test of a Morphing High-Lift Device for a Regional Aircraft , 2011 .