New Contrast Media Designed for X-Ray Energy Subtraction Imaging in Digital Mammography

Rationale and Objectives:In contrast-enhanced dual-energy subtraction imaging 2 images acquired postcontrast media administration at different energies are subtracted to highlight structures hidden in the absence of contrast media. X-ray spectra of the newly developed digital full-field mammography units (GE Senographe 2000 D) are dominated by the emission lines of the Mo or Rh anodes. The K–edge of Zirconium (Zr) is flanked by these 2 emission lines. Thus, the attenuation of Zr should experience a pronounced change of attenuation in parallel with a change of anodes. Under clinically relevant conditions, the contrasting behavior of Zr should be compared with that of other elements having K-edge energies outside the window spanned by the 2 anode emission lines. Methods:Solutions containing the contrasting elements Br, Y, Zr, I, and Gd were investigated for dual-energy subtraction in digital mammography with the 2 anode/filter settings (Mo/Mo and Rh/Rh). These solutions were investigated in phantom studies in the energy range conventionally used in mammography. Additionally, the contrasting behavior of Zr and I was compared in an in vivo study in rats. Results:The sweeping over the K–edge by alternating between the Mo and Rh anodes increases the detection of Zr in energy subtraction imaging at constant high voltage. This procedure does not lead to sufficient contrast enhancement for iodine-based contrast media which become detectable by increasing the high voltage to 40–49 kV. Conclusion:The instrumental and physical data outlined predestine Zr as contrasting element with a high potential for energy subtraction imaging in digital mammography in the energy range conventionally applied.

[1]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation. , 2001, Radiology.

[2]  W.-R. Dix,et al.  Intravenous coronary angiography with synchrotron radiation , 1998, CARS.

[3]  W. Kaiser,et al.  MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Preliminary observations. , 1989, Radiology.

[4]  Peter C Gøtzsche,et al.  Cochrane review on screening for breast cancer with mammography , 2001, The Lancet.

[5]  H. Genant,et al.  Comparative assessment of dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy radiography. , 1990, Radiology.

[6]  C. Wahlström,et al.  Contrast-enhanced radiography by differential absorption, using a laser-produced x-ray source. , 1997, Investigative radiology.

[7]  M. Taira,et al.  Studies on radiopaque composites containing ZrO2-SiO2 fillers prepared by the sol-gel process. , 1993, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[8]  R. Brooks,et al.  The effects of particulate bone cements at the bone-implant interface. , 2001, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[9]  M Gambaccini,et al.  Spatial resolution measurements in quasimonochromatic x rays with mosaic crystals for mammography application. , 2001, Medical physics.

[10]  S. Haga,et al.  Maximum density of tumor staining obtained by preoperative IV-DSA as a prognostic indicator for node-negative breast cancer , 1999, Breast cancer.

[11]  Manfred Thelen,et al.  Spiral-Computertomographie der Mamma , 1994 .

[12]  R. J. Eastgate,et al.  Optimal x-ray spectra for screen-film mammography. , 1981, Medical physics.

[13]  M Gambaccini,et al.  Mammography with synchrotron radiation. , 1995, Radiology.

[14]  W R Brody,et al.  A method for selective tissue and bone visualization using dual energy scanned projection radiography. , 1981, Medical physics.

[15]  F. Carroll,et al.  Tunable monochromatic X rays: a new paradigm in medicine. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  A. D. Watson,et al.  Metal-Based X-ray Contrast Media. , 1999, Chemical reviews.

[17]  A. Macovski,et al.  Generalized image combinations in dual KVP digital radiography. , 1981, Medical physics.

[18]  H Kanamori,et al.  Direct measurement of mammographic x-ray spectra using a CdZnTe detector. , 2000, Medical physics.

[19]  Ingvar Andersson,et al.  Long-term effects of mammography screening: updated overview of the Swedish randomised trials , 2002, The Lancet.

[20]  C. Kuhl,et al.  Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? , 1999, Radiology.