A computer algorithm to impute interrupted heart rate data for the spectral analysis of heart rate variability--the ARIC study.

The shorter term beat-to-beat heart rate data collected from the general population are often interrupted by artifacts, and an arbitrary exclusion of such individuals from analysis may significantly reduce the sample size and/or introduce selection bias. A computer algorithm was developed to label as artifacts any data points outside the upper and lower limits generated by a 5-beat moving average +/- 25% (or set manually by an operator using a mouse) and to impute beat-to-beat heart rate throughout an artifact period to preserve the timing relationships of the adjacent, uncorrupted heart rate data. The algorithm applies Fast Fourier Transformation to the smoothed data to estimate low-frequency (LF; 0.025-0.15 Hz) and high-frequency (HF; 0.16-0.35 Hz) spectral powers and the HF/LF ratio as conventional indices of sympathetic, vagal, and vagal-sympathetic balance components, respectively. We applied this algorithm to resting, supine, 2-min beat-to-beat heart rate data collected in the population-based Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study to assess the performance (success rate) of the algorithm (N = 526) and the inter-and intra-data-operator repeatability of using this computer algorithm (N = 108). Eighty-eight percent (88%) of the records could be smoothed by the computer-generated limits, an additional 4.8% by manually set limits, and 7.4% of the data could not be processed due to a large number of artifacts in the beginning or the end of the records. For the repeatability study, 108 records were selected at random, and two trained data operators applied this algorithm to the same records twice within a 6-month interval of each process (blinded to each other's results and their own prior results). The inter-data-operator reliability coefficients were 0.86, 0.92, and 0.90 for the HF, LF, and HF/LF components, respectively. The average intra-data-operator reliability coefficients were 0.99, 0.99, and 0.98 for the HF, LF, and HF/LF components, respectively. These results indicate that this computer algorithm is efficient and highly repeatable in processing short-term beat-to-beat heart rate data collected from the general population, given that the data operators are trained according to standardized protocol.

[1]  R. Carney,et al.  Correlation of heart rate variability with clinical and angiographic variables and late mortality after coronary angiography. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  Glenn A. Myers,et al.  Power Spectral Analysis of Heart Rate Varability in Sudden Cardiac Death: Comparison to Other Methods , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  J. Hayano,et al.  Decreased magnitude of heart rate spectral components in coronary artery disease. Its relation to angiographic severity. , 1990, Circulation.

[4]  M Malik,et al.  Circadian rhythm of heart rate variability after acute myocardial infarction and its influence on the prognostic value of heart rate variability. , 1990, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  M. N. Levy,et al.  Autonomic Interactions in Cardiac Control a , 1990, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[6]  N. Ohte,et al.  Severity of coronary atherosclerosis correlates with the respiratory component of heart rate variability. , 1991, American heart journal.

[7]  J M Neilson,et al.  RR interval variations in young male diabetics. , 1975, British heart journal.

[8]  D H Singer,et al.  Heart Rate Variability , 1992 .

[9]  G. Breithardt,et al.  Heart rate variability: standards of measurement, physiological interpretation and clinical use. Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology. , 1996 .

[10]  R J Cohen,et al.  Assessment of autonomic regulation in chronic congestive heart failure by heart rate spectral analysis. , 1988, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  J. Miller,et al.  Decreased heart rate variability and its association with increased mortality after acute myocardial infarction. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  J. Zbilut,et al.  Decreased heart rate variability in significant cardiac events. , 1988, Critical care medicine.

[13]  M. Turiel,et al.  Power Spectral Analysis of Heart Rate and Arterial Pressure Variabilities as a Marker of Sympatho‐Vagal Interaction in Man and Conscious Dog , 1986, Circulation research.

[14]  Ferdinand J. Venditti,et al.  Reduced Heart Rate Variability and Mortalit Risk in an Elderly Cohort: The Framingham Heart Study , 1994, Circulation.

[15]  I. O'Brien,et al.  Heart rate variability in healthy subjects: effect of age and the derivation of normal ranges for tests of autonomic function. , 1986, British heart journal.

[16]  J. Hayano,et al.  Accuracy of assessment of cardiac vagal tone by heart rate variability in normal subjects. , 1991, The American journal of cardiology.

[17]  R. Cohen,et al.  Power spectrum analysis of heart rate fluctuation: a quantitative probe of beat-to-beat cardiovascular control. , 1981, Science.

[18]  D H Singer,et al.  Heart rate variability and sudden death secondary to coronary artery disease during ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring. , 1987, The American journal of cardiology.

[19]  D. Adam,et al.  Assessment of autonomic function in humans by heart rate spectral analysis. , 1985, The American journal of physiology.

[20]  J. Halter,et al.  Quantitative Evaluation of Cardiac Parasympathetic Activity in Normal and Diabetic Man , 1982, Diabetes.