Dose tailoring of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer based on hematologic toxicities: further results from the prospective PANTHER study with focus on obese patients

Background Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) for breast cancer improves relapse-free survival (BCRFS) and overall survival. Differences in terms of efficacy and toxicity could partly be explained by the significant interpatient variability in pharmacokinetics which cannot be captured by dosing according to body surface area. Consequently, tailored dosing was prospectively evaluated in the PANTHER trial. Patients and methods PANTHER is a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase III trial which compared tailored, dose-dense (DD) epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (E/C) and tailored docetaxel (D) (tDD) with standard interval 5-fluorouracil/E/C and D. The primary end point was BCRFS and the primary efficacy analysis has been previously published. In this secondary analysis, we aimed to retrospectively explore the concept of dose tailoring. Our two hypotheses were that BCRFS would not vary depending on the cumulative administered epirubicin dose; and that dose tailoring would lead to appropriate dosing and improved outcomes for obese patients, who are known to have worse prognosis and increased toxicity after DD ACT. Results Patients treated with tDD had similar BCRFS regardless of the cumulative epirubicin dose (P = 0.495), while obese patients in this group [body mass index (BMI) ≥30] had improved BCRFS compared with nonobese ones (BMI <30) [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.30-0.89, P = 0.02]. Moreover, tDD was associated with improved BCRFS compared with standard treatment only in obese patients (HR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.26-0.90, P = 0.022) but not in nonobese ones (HR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.60-1.04, P = 0.089). The differences were not formally statistically significant (P for interaction 0.175). There were no differences in terms of toxicity across the epirubicin dose levels or the BMI groups. Conclusions Dose tailoring is a feasible strategy that can potentially improve outcomes in obese patients without increasing toxicity and should be pursued in further clinical studies. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00798070.

[1]  J. Bergh,et al.  Increasing the dose density of adjuvant chemotherapy by shortening intervals between courses or by sequential drug administration significantly reduces both disease recurrence and breast cancer mortality: An EBCTCG meta-analysis of 21,000 women in 16 randomised trials , 2018 .

[2]  J. Bergh,et al.  Long-term safety and survival outcomes from the Scandinavian Breast Group 2004-1 randomized phase II trial of tailored dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer , 2017, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[3]  R. Greil,et al.  Effect of Tailored Dose-Dense Chemotherapy vs Standard 3-Weekly Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Recurrence-Free Survival Among Women With High-Risk Early Breast Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. , 2016, JAMA.

[4]  P. Goodwin,et al.  Obesity and Breast Cancer Prognosis: Evidence, Challenges, and Opportunities. , 2016, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  C. Denkert,et al.  Higher rate of severe toxicities in obese patients receiving dose-dense (dd) chemotherapy according to unadjusted body surface area: results of the prospectively randomized GAIN study. , 2016, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[6]  G. Tang,et al.  Body Mass Index at Diagnosis and Breast Cancer Survival Prognosis in Clinical Trial Populations from NRG Oncology/NSABP B-30, B-31, B-34, and B-38 , 2015, Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

[7]  M. Beckmann,et al.  The influence of obesity on survival in early, high-risk breast cancer: results from the randomized SUCCESS A trial , 2015, Breast Cancer Research.

[8]  Keda Yu,et al.  Overweight as a Prognostic Factor for Triple-Negative Breast Cancers in Chinese Women , 2015, PloS one.

[9]  A. Schneeweiss,et al.  Impact of body mass index on neoadjuvant treatment outcome: a pooled analysis of eight prospective neoadjuvant breast cancer trials , 2015, Breast Cancer Research and Treatment.

[10]  E. Perez,et al.  Obesity at diagnosis is associated with inferior outcomes in hormone receptor‐positive operable breast cancer , 2012, Cancer.

[11]  G. Rosner,et al.  Appropriate chemotherapy dosing for obese adult patients with cancer: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  J. Bergh,et al.  A randomised feasibility/phase II study (SBG 2004-1) with dose-dense/tailored epirubicin, cyclophoshamide (EC) followed by docetaxel (T) or fixed dosed dose-dense EC/T versus T, doxorubicin and C (TAC) in node-positive breast cancer , 2011, Acta oncologica.

[13]  G. Kerr,et al.  Moderate neutropenia with adjuvant CMF confers improved survival in early breast cancer , 2003, British Journal of Cancer.

[14]  Richard L Schilsky,et al.  Improved outcomes from adding sequential Paclitaxel but not from escalating Doxorubicin dose in an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with node-positive primary breast cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  C. Blomqvist,et al.  Leucocyte nadir as a marker for chemotherapy efficacy in node-positive breast cancer treated with adjuvant CMF , 1999, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  A. Goldhirsch,et al.  Dose–response effect of adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, 5-fluorouracil (CMF) in node-positive breast cancer , 1998 .

[17]  Comparisons between different polychemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer: meta-analyses of long-term outcome among 100 000 women in 123 randomised trials , 2012 .

[18]  A. Auvinen,et al.  Haematological toxicity: a marker of adjuvant chemotherapy efficacy in stage II and III breast cancer. , 1997, British Journal of Cancer.