Cost Analysis and Economic Assessment of Proposed Electric-Discharge Non-Thermal Plasma Processes for NOX Removal in Jet-Engine Exhaust: White Paper for SERDP Project CP-1038

Abstract : Incentives for implementing new pollution-control technologies are both regulatory and economic. Given considerable regulatory pressure, new de-NOx technologies are being explored. One major reason for this is that conventional de-NOx methods will not work effectively for the low NO concentrations (e.g., < 50 ppm), high exhaust gas flow rates, and low gas temperatures characteristic of Jet Engines Test Cells (JETCs). This project is currently evaluating non-thermal plasma (NTP) technologies for treating jet-engine exhaust. In the past, economic analysis for NTP de-NOx has shown that it is not cost effective, compared to other techniques. One might accept a high-cost system, if it can provide a function or functions that other (conventional) technologies cannot. However, it would certainly be better if a new technology could function as well or better than a conventional technology and do so at competitive costs. In this White Paper, we have analyzed the costs of some NTP technologies for jet-engine emissions control. In some cases, these analyses have shown lower exhaust-gas treatment costs for NTP systems compared to a baseline standard de-NOx technology like SCR combined with wet scrubbing. Therefore, the main conclusion of this White Paper is that completing this project's work through the small field-pilot demonstration phase should proceed to provide further data and operating experience to more fully evaluate economic and performance projections for NTP de-NOx technology.

[1]  Q. G. Mulazzani,et al.  Radiation treatment of combustion gases: Formulation and test of a reaction model , 1985 .

[2]  B. Penetrante,et al.  Plasma-assisted catalytic reduction of NO x , 1998 .

[3]  Jen-Shih Chang,et al.  Removal of NOx from flue gas by corona discharge activated methane radical showers , 1997 .

[4]  Senichi Masuda,et al.  Control of NO/sub x/ by positive and negative pulsed corona discharges , 1990 .

[5]  L. Civitano Industrial Application of Pulsed Corona Processing to Flue Gas , 1993 .

[6]  B. Penetrante,et al.  Comparison of electrical discharge techniques for nonthermal plasma processing of NO in N/sub 2/ , 1995 .

[7]  William M. Vatavuk,et al.  Estimating costs of air pollution control , 1990 .

[8]  D. Douglas-Hamilton,et al.  Electron‐beam‐initiated destruction of low concentrations of vinyl chloride in carrier gases , 1981 .

[9]  I. Gallimberti Impulse corona simulation for flue gas treatment , 1988 .

[10]  H. Paur Removal of Volatile Hydrocarbons from Industrial Off-Gas , 1993 .

[11]  Jen-Shih Chang,et al.  Non-Thermal Plasma Techniques for the Reduction of Volatile Organic Compounds in Air Streams: A Critical Review , 1997 .

[12]  J. Chang,et al.  Reduction of NOx From Combustion Flue Gases by Corona Discharge Activated Methane Radical Injections , 1998 .

[13]  H. Matzing Chemical Kinetics of Flue Gas Cleaning by Irradiation with Electrons , 2007 .

[14]  Akira Mizuno,et al.  A Method for the Removal of Sulfur Dioxide from Exhaust Gas Utilizing Pulsed Streamer Corona for Electron Energization , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.