Biologically effective uniform dose (D) for specification, report and comparison of dose response relations and treatment plans.

Developments in radiation therapy planning have improved the information about the three-dimensional dose distribution in the patient. Isodose graphs, dose volume histograms and most recently radiobiological models can be used to evaluate the dose distribution delivered to the irradiated organs and volumes of interest. The concept of a biologically effective uniform dose (D) assumes that any two dose distributions are equivalent if they cause the same probability for tumour control or normal tissue complication. In the present paper the D concept both for tumours and normal tissues is presented, making use of the fact that probabilities averaged over both dose distribution and organ radiosensitivity are more relevant to the clinical outcome than the expected number of surviving clonogens or functional subunits. D can be calculated in complex target volumes or organs at risk either from the 3D dose matrix or from the corresponding dose volume histograms of the dose plan. The value of the D concept is demonstrated by applying it to two treatment plans of a cervix cancer. Comparison is made of the D concept with the effective dose (Deff ) and equivalent uniform dose (EUD) that have been suggested in the past. The value of the concept for complex targets and fractionation schedules is also pointed out.

[1]  M A Ebert,et al.  Viability of the EUD and TCP concepts as reliable dose indicators. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  A B Wolbarst,et al.  Optimization of radiation therapy II: the critical-voxel model. , 1984, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[3]  A Brahme,et al.  Development of Radiation Therapy Optimization , 2000, Acta oncologica.

[4]  A Brahme,et al.  Dosimetric precision requirements in radiation therapy. , 1984, Acta radiologica. Oncology.

[5]  G J Kutcher,et al.  Analysis of clinical complication data for radiation hepatitis using a parallel architecture model. , 1995, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  A Brahme,et al.  Tumour and normal tissue responses to fractionated non-uniform dose delivery. , 1992, International journal of radiation biology.

[7]  C Kappas,et al.  Optimization of the dose level for a given treatment plan to maximize the complication-free tumor cure. , 1999, Acta oncologica.

[8]  A Brahme,et al.  An algorithm for maximizing the probability of complication-free tumour control in radiation therapy , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  R. Arriagada,et al.  Radiotherapy alone in breast cancer. I. Analysis of tumor parameters, tumor dose and local control: the experience of the Gustave-Roussy Institute and the Princess Margaret Hospital. , 1985, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[10]  P Aaltonen,et al.  Specification of dose delivery in radiation therapy. Recommendation by the Nordic Association of Clinical Physics (NACP). , 1997, Acta oncologica.

[11]  A. Brahme,et al.  The need for accurate target and dose specifications in conventional and conformal radiation therapy--an introduction. , 1997, Acta oncologica.

[12]  G K Svensson,et al.  Optimization of radiation therapy: integral-response of a model biological system. , 1982, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  A. Niemierko Reporting and analyzing dose distributions: a concept of equivalent uniform dose. , 1997, Medical physics.

[14]  A Brahme,et al.  Volume and heterogeneity dependence of the dose-response relationship for head and neck tumours. , 1995, Acta oncologica.

[15]  Bengt K. Lind,et al.  Radiation therapy planning and optimization studied as inverse problems , 1991 .

[16]  H. Withers,et al.  Treatment volume and tissue tolerance. , 1988, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  P W Hoban,et al.  Treatment plan comparison using equivalent uniform biologically effective dose (EUBED). , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  T E Schultheiss,et al.  Models in radiotherapy: volume effects. , 1983, Medical physics.

[19]  I. Lax,et al.  Factors influencing the risk for complications following Gamma Knife radiosurgery of cerebral arteriovenous malformations. , 1997, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[20]  M. Tubiana,et al.  An approach to the interpretation of clinical data on the tumour control probability-dose relationship. , 1988, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[21]  J C Rosenwald,et al.  Comparison of conformal radiation therapy techniques within the dynamic radiotherapy project 'Dynarad'. , 2000, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  A Ottolenghi,et al.  Radiation pneumonitis after breast cancer irradiation: analysis of the complication probability using the relative seriality model. , 2000, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[23]  M. Goitein,et al.  Tolerance of normal tissue to therapeutic irradiation. , 1991, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[24]  G. Barendsen,et al.  Dose fractionation, dose rate and iso-effect relationships for normal tissue responses. , 1982, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[25]  B Mijnheer,et al.  Current clinical practice versus new developments in target volume and dose specification procedures: a contradiction? , 1997, Acta oncologica.