Method of identifying the strategic placement for compensation devices

An algorithm has been developed for identifying power system bus clusters, called control areas, that have strong local controllability and observability property for measurements and controls at the buses or on generators within the control area. In this paper, two types of control areas are identified using the proposed algorithm. The two control areas are identical under light load conditions, but they are different as the power system approaches voltage collapse or poorly damped low frequency oscillations. Simulation studies of a simple two area power system model were conducted to assess the understanding of strong controllability and observability of the two different types of control areas. This helps in understanding of voltage instability and inter-area oscillations. Hence, one can utilize the proposed algorithm for guidance to place compensation devices such as FACTS or nonFACTS devices strategically so that the performance of the power system will be enhanced to the full. >

[1]  J. Dorsey,et al.  Global and Local Dynamic Equivalents Based on Structural Archetypes for Coherency , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[2]  R. Schlueter,et al.  STRONG CONTROLLABILITY AND OBSERVABILITY AND THEIR EFFECTS ON TRANSIENT STABILITY OF POWER SYSTEMS , 1995 .

[3]  C. Paige Properties of numerical algorithms related to computing controllability , 1981 .

[4]  B. Moore Principal component analysis in linear systems: Controllability, observability, and model reduction , 1981 .

[5]  Joe H. Chow,et al.  Area decomposition for electromechanical models of power systems , 1980, Autom..

[6]  G. J. Rogers,et al.  A fundamental study of inter-area oscillations in power systems , 1991 .

[7]  Ian Dobson,et al.  Towards a theory of voltage collapse in electric power systems , 1989 .

[8]  Robert A. Schlueter,et al.  Method of identifying weak transmission network stability boundaries , 1993 .

[9]  R. Schlueter,et al.  Modal-Coherent Equivalents Derived from an RMS Coherency Measure , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[10]  J. Zaborszky,et al.  A Clustered Dynamic Model for a class of LInear Autonomous Systems Unsing Simple Enumerative Sorting , 1982 .

[11]  Robert A. Schlueter,et al.  Structural archetypes for coherency: A framework for comparing power system equivalents , 1984, Autom..

[12]  Raymond A. DeCarlo,et al.  Computing the distance to an uncontrollable system , 1989, Proceedings of the 28th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control,.