The Influence Of Vertical Wind Direction Shear On Dispersion In The Convective Boundary Layer, And Its Incorporation In Coastal Fumigation Models

The mean concentration distributionwithin a plume released from a point source in the atmosphericboundary layer can be greatly influenced by the systematic turningof wind with height (i.e. vertical wind direction shear). Such aninfluence includes a deflection of the plume centroid, with anassociated shearing of the vertical plume cross-section, and anenhancement of dispersion, in the horizontal plane. Wind directionshear is normally not accounted for in coastal fumigation models,although dispersion observations with shear acting as acontrolling parameter are not uncommon. A three-dimensionalLagrangian stochastic model is used to investigate the influenceof uniform wind direction shear on the diffusion of a point-sourceplume within the horizontally homogeneous convective boundarylayer, with the source located at the top of the boundary layer.Parameterisations are developed for the plume deflection andenhanced dispersion due to shear within the framework of aprobability density function (PDF) approach, and compared with theLagrangian model results. These parameterisations are thenincorporated into two applied coastal fumigation models: a PDFmodel, and a commonly used model that assumes uniform andinstantaneous mixing in the vertical direction. The PDF modelrepresents the vertical mixing process more realistically. A moreefficient version of the PDF model, which assumes a well-mixedconcentration distribution in the vertical at large times, isapplied to simulate sulfur dioxide data from the Kwinana CoastalFumigation Study. A comparison between the model results and thedata show that the model performs much better when the wind-sheareffects are included.

[1]  Dispersion from tall stacks into a shore line environment , 1980 .

[2]  J. Hacker,et al.  The Kwinana Coastal Fumigation Study: II – Growth of the Thermal Internal Boundary Layer , 1998 .

[3]  The Kwinana Coastal Fumigation Study: I – Program Overview, Experimental Design and Selected Results , 1998 .

[4]  Peter J. Hurley,et al.  Comparison of closure schemes used to specify the velocity PDF in Lagrangian stochastic dispersion models for convective conditions , 1996 .

[5]  R. Britter,et al.  An application of Lagrangian stochastic modelling to dispersion during shoreline fumigation , 1990 .

[6]  F. B. Smith.  The role of wind shear in horizontal diffusion of ambient particles , 1965 .

[7]  Li Zhibian,et al.  A shoreline fumigation model with wind shear , 1995 .

[8]  Ground-level concentrations due to fumigation into an entraining mixed layer , 1982 .

[9]  P. Saffman.  The effect of wind shear on horizontal spread from an instantaneous ground source , 1962 .

[10]  S. Sethuraman,et al.  A statistical evaluation and comparison of coastal point source Dispersion Models , 1986 .

[11]  Y. Shao,et al.  The structure of turbulence in a coastal atmospheric boundary layer , 1991 .

[12]  B. Sawford.  Rotation Of Trajectories In Lagrangian Stochastic Models Of Turbulent Dispersion , 1999 .

[13]  S. Hassid,et al.  A turbulent energy model for diffusion in the convective boundary layer , 1984 .

[14]  B. Sawford,et al.  An examination of existing shoreline fumigation models and formulation of an improved model , 1996 .

[15]  G. Briggs,et al.  Simple PDF models for convectively driven vertical diffusion , 1988 .

[16]  M. Hibberd.  Vertical dispersion of a passive scalar in the convective boundary layer: new laboratory results , 2000 .

[17]  Y. Shao.  Turbulent dispersion in coastal atmospheric boundary layers: An application of a Lagrangian model , 1992 .

[18]  Michael S. Borgas,et al.  An efficient Lagrangian stochastic model of vertical dispersion in the convective boundary layer , 1999 .

[19]  P. Hurley,et al.  The Kwinana Coastal Fumigation Study: III – Meteorological and Turbulence Modelling on Selected Days , 2000 .

[20]  A. Luhar,et al.  A laboratory study and improved pdf model of fumigation into a growing convective boundary layer , 1996 .

[21]  A Discussion on recent research in air pollution - The influence of the turning of wind with height on crosswind diffusion , 1969, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[22]  Revised Estimates for Continuous Shoreline Fumigation , 1979 .

[23]  J. Weil.  Dispersion in the Convective Boundary Layer , 1988 .

[24]  An Analytical Slab Model for the Growth of the Coastal Thermal Internal Boundary Layer Under Near-Neutral Onshore Flow Conditions , 1998 .

[25]  Lagrangian stochastic modeling of the coastal fumigation phenomenon , 1995 .

[26]  Rex Britter,et al.  A random walk model for dispersion in inhomogeneous turbulence in a convective boundary layer , 1989 .

[27]  Jeffrey Weil,et al.  A Diagnosis of the Asymmetry in Top-Down and Bottom-Up Diffusion Using a Lagrangian Stochastic Model , 1990 .

[28]  A. Kouchi,et al.  A Wind Tunnel and Numerical Investigation of Turbulent Dispersion in Coastal Atmospheric Boundary Layers , 1998 .

[29]  D. Thomson.  Criteria for the selection of stochastic models of particle trajectories in turbulent flows , 1987, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[30]  U. Högström,et al.  An experimental study on atmospheric diffusion , 1964 .

[31]  Akula Venkatram,et al.  Dispersion in the Stable Boundary Layer , 1988 .

[32]  R. V. Portelli.  The Nanticoke shoreline diffusion experiment, June 1978—I. Experimental design and program overview , 1982 .

[33]  Michael S. Borgas,et al.  A skewed meandering plume model for concentration statistics in the convective boundary layer , 2000 .

[34]  S. Caughey,et al.  Observed Characteristics of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer , 1984 .