Public Information and Electoral Bias

We present a theory of strategic voting that predicts elections are more likely to be close and voter turnout is more likely to be high when citizens possess better public information about the composition of the electorate. These findings are disturbing because they suggest that providing more information to potential voters about aggregate political preferences (e.g., through polls, political stock markets, or expert forecasts) may actually undermine the democratic process. We show that if the distribution of preferences is common knowledge, then strategic voting leads to a stark neutrality result in which the probability that either alternative wins the election is 12 . This occurs because members of the minority compensate exactly for their smaller group size by voting with higher frequency. By contrast, when citizens are symmetrically ignorant about the distribution of types, the majority is more likely to win the election and expected voter turnout is lower. Indeed, when the population is large and voting costs are small, the majority wins with probability arbitrarily close to one in equilibrium. Welfare is, therefore, unambiguously higher when citizens possess less information about the distribution of political preferences. ∗We thank Han Hong and Oksana Loginova for helpful suggestions. Taylor’s research was supported in part by NSF grant SES-0417737. †Department of Economics, Duke University, Box 90097, Durham, NC 27708-0097, email: crtaylor@econ.duke.edu ‡Department of Economics, Duke University, Box 90097, Durham, NC 27708-0097, email: yildirh@econ.duke.edu

[1]  Matthew A. Turner,et al.  Meetings with Costly Participation , 2000 .

[2]  César Martinelli,et al.  Would rational voters acquire costly information? , 2006, J. Econ. Theory.

[3]  Curtis R. Taylor,et al.  An Analysis of Rational Voting with Private Values and Cost Uncertainty , 2006 .

[4]  Esteban F. Klor,et al.  On Public Opinion Polls and Voters' Turnout , 2006 .

[5]  Schenley Park The Downsian model of electoral participation : Formal theory and empirical analysis of the constituency size effect , 2004 .

[6]  Michele Piccione,et al.  Sequential Voting Procedures in Symmetric Binary Elections , 2000, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Large Poisson Games , 2000, J. Econ. Theory.

[8]  Allan Drazen,et al.  Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy , 2007 .

[9]  M. Jackson,et al.  Strategic Candidacy and Voting Procedures , 2001 .

[10]  John H. Aldrich Rational Choice and Turnout , 1993 .

[11]  T. Feddersen,et al.  Convicting the Innocent: The Inferiority of Unanimous Jury Verdicts under Strategic Voting , 1996, American Political Science Review.

[12]  Darrell M. West,et al.  Polling effects in election campaigns , 1991 .

[13]  J. Goeree,et al.  False Consensus Voting and Welfare Reducing Polls , 2004 .

[14]  Anthony F. Heath,et al.  THE 1992 BRITISH ELECTION: THE FAILURE OF THE POLLS , 1993 .

[15]  David K. Levine,et al.  The Paradox of Voter Participation? A Laboratory Study , 2007, American Political Science Review.

[16]  T. Feddersen,et al.  Voting Behavior and Information Aggregation in Elections with Private Information , 1997 .

[17]  Thomas R. Palfrey,et al.  A strategic calculus of voting , 1983 .

[18]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Population uncertainty and Poisson games , 1998, Int. J. Game Theory.

[19]  John Duggan,et al.  Private polling in elections and voter welfare , 2009, J. Econ. Theory.

[20]  Ronny Razin,et al.  Signaling and Election Motivations in a Voting Model with Common Values and Responsive Candidates , 2003 .

[21]  Stefan Krasa,et al.  Is Mandatory Voting Better than Voluntary Voting? , 2007, Games Econ. Behav..

[22]  Thomas R. Palfrey,et al.  Voter Participation and Strategic Uncertainty , 1985, American Political Science Review.

[23]  Enrico Spolaore,et al.  Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy , 2007 .

[24]  A. Blais,et al.  The Polls in the 2002 French Presidential Election: An Autopsy , 2004 .

[25]  Seymour Sudman,et al.  Do Exit Polls Influence Voting Behavior , 1986 .

[26]  John O. Ledyard,et al.  The pure theory of large two-candidate elections , 1984 .

[27]  N. Persico Committee Design with Endogenous Information , 2004 .

[28]  Colin M. Campbell Large Electorates and Decisive Minorities , 1999, Journal of Political Economy.

[29]  P. Sørensen,et al.  The Strategy of Professional Forecasting , 2001 .