Modified Maximum Likelihood Classifications of Urban Land Use: Spatial Segmentation of Prior Probabilities

Abstract A technique for improving the classification of urban land use by modifying the standard maximum likelihood discriminant function within spatially segmented urban parameters is introduced. The methodology examines how population census data can be used to modify prior probabilities, not at the global or regional scales, but at the intra‐urban local level. This involves spatial segmentation of a Landsat TM image by areal census collection boundaries from which prior probabilities are generated with respect to varying proportions of three housing types. Consistent improvements over classifications produced by standard equal prior probabilities are evident on four settlements in southwest England. Total absolute error is lower under modified prior probabilities, but no one housing type has consistently lower area estimation error. Evidence suggests that high density housing is under‐estimated (less pixels classified), and conversely that low density housing is over‐estimated (more pixels classified).

[1]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Textural Features for Image Classification , 1973, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern..

[2]  Gregory L. Muhlin,et al.  Urban Analysis and Planning , 1974 .

[3]  R. Kettig,et al.  Classification of Multispectral Image Data by Extraction and Classification of Homogeneous Objects , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience Electronics.

[4]  Alan H. Strahler,et al.  The Use of Prior Probabilities in Maximum Likelihood Classification , 1980 .

[5]  Philip H. Swain,et al.  Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[6]  L. D. Miller,et al.  An automated land-use mapping comparison of the Bayesian maximum likelihood and linear discriminant analysis algorithms , 1984 .

[7]  B. Forster An examination of some problems and solutions in monitoring urban areas from satellite platforms , 1985 .

[8]  Paul M. Mather,et al.  A computationally-efficient maximum-likelihood classifier employing prior probabilities for remotely-sensed data , 1985 .

[9]  Keinosuke Fukunaga,et al.  Bayes Error Estimation Using Parzen and k-NN Procedures , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Andrew K. Skidmore,et al.  Forest mapping accuracies are improved using a supervised nonparametric classifier with SPOT data , 1988 .

[11]  F. Maselli,et al.  Inclusion of prior probabilities derived from a nonparametric process, into the maximum-likelihood classifer , 1992 .

[12]  N. Campbell,et al.  Derivation and applications of probabilistic measures of class membership from the maximum-likelihood classification , 1992 .

[13]  Fabio Maselli,et al.  Use of error matrices to improve area estimates with maximum likelihood classification procedures , 1992 .

[14]  Julian Besag,et al.  Towards Bayesian image analysis , 1993 .

[15]  S. Ventura,et al.  THE INTEGRATION OF GEOGRAPHIC DATA WITH REMOTELY SENSED IMAGERY TO IMPROVE CLASSIFICATION IN AN URBAN AREA , 1995 .

[16]  Josiane Zerubia,et al.  Bayesian image classification using Markov random fields , 1996, Image Vis. Comput..

[17]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Fine spatial resolution satellite sensors for the next decade , 1997 .

[18]  S. Barr,et al.  Distinguishing urban land-use categories in fine spatial resolution land-cover data using a graph-based, structural pattern recognition system , 1997 .

[19]  P. Fisher The pixel: A snare and a delusion , 1997 .

[20]  Roland L. Redmond,et al.  Estimation and Mapping of Misclassification Probabilities for Thematic Land Cover Maps , 1998 .

[21]  V. Mesev The use of census data in urban image classification , 1998 .

[22]  Paul A. Longley,et al.  Modified maximum-likelihood classification algorithms and their application to urban remote sensing , 2000 .