Three amino acids in the D2 dopamine receptor regulate selective ligand function and affinity

The D2 dopamine receptor is an important therapeutic target for the treatment of psychotic, agitated, and abnormal behavioral states. To better understand the specific interactions of subtype‐selective ligands with dopamine receptor subtypes, seven ligands with high selectivity (>120‐fold) for the D4 subtype of dopamine receptor were tested on wild‐type and mutant D2 receptors. Five of the selective ligands were observed to have 21‐fold to 293‐fold increases in D2 receptor affinity when three non‐conserved amino acids in TM2 and TM3 were mutated to the corresponding D4 amino acids. The two ligands with the greatest improvement in affinity for the D2 mutant receptor [i.e., 3‐{[4‐(4‐iodophenyl) piperazin‐1‐yl]methyl}‐1H‐pyrrolo[2,3‐b]pyridine (L‐750,667) and 1‐[4‐iodobenzyl]‐4‐[N‐(3‐isopropoxy‐2‐pyridinyl)‐N‐methyl]‐aminopiperidine (RBI‐257)] were investigated in functional assays. Consistent with their higher affinity for the mutant than for the wild‐type receptor, concentrations of L‐750,667 or RBI‐257 that produced large reductions in the potency of quinpirole’s functional response in the mutant did not significantly reduce quinpirole’s functional response in the wild‐type D2 receptor. In contrast to RBI‐257 which is an antagonist at all receptors, L‐750,667 is a partial agonist at the wild‐type D2 but an antagonist at both the mutant D2 and wild‐type D4 receptors. Our study demonstrates for the first time that the TM2/3 microdomain of the D2 dopamine receptor not only regulates the selective affinity of ligands, but in selected cases can also regulate their function. Utilizing a new docking technique that incorporates receptor backbone flexibility, the three non‐conserved amino acids that encompass the TM2/3 microdomain were found to account in large part for the differences in intermolecular steric contacts between the ligands and receptors. Consistent with the experimental data, this model illustrates the interactions between a variety of subtype‐selective ligands and the wild‐type D2, mutant D2, or wild‐type D4 receptors.

[1]  Sandhya Kortagere,et al.  Reciprocal Mutations in TM2/TM3 in a D2 Dopamine Receptor Background Confirms the Importance of this Microdomain as a Selective Determinant of Para‐Halogenated 1,4‐Disubstituted Aromatic Piperazines , 2005, Archiv der Pharmazie.

[2]  E C Hulme,et al.  The Functional Topography of Transmembrane Domain 3 of the M1 Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor, Revealed by Scanning Mutagenesis* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  C. Gallen,et al.  Effectiveness of the selective D4 antagonist sonepiprazole in schizophrenia: a placebo-controlled trial , 2004, Biological Psychiatry.

[4]  D. Sibley,et al.  Nonconserved residues in the second transmembrane-spanning domain of the D(4) dopamine receptor are molecular determinants of D(4)-selective pharmacology. , 2000, Molecular pharmacology.

[5]  Claudio N. Cavasotto,et al.  Representing receptor flexibility in ligand docking through relevant normal modes. , 2005, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[6]  Peter Gmeiner,et al.  Certain 1,4-Disubstituted Aromatic Piperidines and Piperazines with Extreme Selectivity for the Dopamine D4 Receptor Interact with a Common Receptor Microdomain , 2004, Molecular Pharmacology.

[7]  T. Blundell,et al.  Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  [19] Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors , 1995 .

[9]  Gerrit Groenhof,et al.  GROMACS: Fast, flexible, and free , 2005, J. Comput. Chem..

[10]  W. L. Jorgensen,et al.  Development and Testing of the OPLS All-Atom Force Field on Conformational Energetics and Properties of Organic Liquids , 1996 .

[11]  Manfred Burghammer,et al.  Structure of bovine rhodopsin in a trigonal crystal form. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  R. Stevens,et al.  High-resolution crystal structure of an engineered human beta2-adrenergic G protein-coupled receptor. , 2007, Science.

[13]  K. Neve,et al.  Structural Determinants of Pharmacological Specificity Between D1 and D2 Dopamine Receptors , 2006, Molecular Pharmacology.

[14]  L. Fabre,et al.  Placebo-controlled study of the D4/5-HT2A antagonist fananserin in the treatment of schizophrenia. , 1999, The American journal of psychiatry.

[15]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998, J. Comput. Chem..

[16]  Christina Z Floresca,et al.  Dopamine Receptor Microdomains Involved in Molecular Recognition and the Regulation of Drug Affinity and Function , 2004, Journal of receptor and signal transduction research.

[17]  W Patrick Walters,et al.  A detailed comparison of current docking and scoring methods on systems of pharmaceutical relevance , 2004, Proteins.

[18]  Shekhar Saxena,et al.  Multiple-informant ranking of the disabling effects of different health conditions in 14 countries , 1999, The Lancet.

[19]  S. W. Lin,et al.  Specific tryptophan UV-absorbance changes are probes of the transition of rhodopsin to its active state. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[20]  J. Millán,et al.  Gly114Asp mutation of rhodopsin in autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa. , 1995, Molecular and Cellular Probes.

[21]  S. Sealfon,et al.  Strategies for mapping the binding site of the serotonin 5-HT2A receptor. , 2002, Methods in enzymology.

[22]  J M Thornton,et al.  LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. , 1995, Protein engineering.

[23]  B. Sommer,et al.  The agonist activities of the putative antipsychotic agents, L‐745,870 and U‐101958 in HEK293 cells expressing the human dopamine D4.4 receptor , 1998, British journal of pharmacology.

[24]  David R. Sibley,et al.  Interactions of the Novel Antipsychotic Aripiprazole (OPC-14597) with Dopamine and Serotonin Receptor Subtypes , 1999, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[25]  P. Garriga,et al.  Unusual Thermal and Conformational Properties of the Rhodopsin Congenital Night Blindness Mutant Thr-94 → Ile* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  Terrence P. Kenakin,et al.  A Pharmacologic Analysis of Drug-Receptor Interaction , 1987 .

[27]  G. Scuseria,et al.  Gaussian 03, Revision E.01. , 2007 .

[28]  R. Mailman,et al.  Aripiprazole, A Novel Atypical Antipsychotic Drug with a Unique and Robust Pharmacology , 2003, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[29]  H. V. Van Tol,et al.  Review the role of dopamine D4 receptors in schizophrenia and antipsychotic action. , 1997, Journal of psychiatric research.

[30]  Patrice Koehl,et al.  NOMAD-Ref: visualization, deformation and refinement of macromolecular structures based on all-atom normal mode analysis , 2006, Nucleic Acids Res..

[31]  Pedro Alexandrino Fernandes,et al.  Protein–ligand docking: Current status and future challenges , 2006, Proteins.

[32]  J. Findlay,et al.  A novel mutation within the rhodopsin gene (Thr‐94‐Ile) causing autosomal dominant congenital stationary night blindness , 1999, Human mutation.

[33]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  Dopamine D4/D2 receptor selectivity is determined by A divergent aromatic microdomain contained within the second, third, and seventh membrane-spanning segments. , 1999, Molecular pharmacology.

[34]  David S. Goodsell,et al.  Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function , 1998 .

[35]  Erik Lindahl,et al.  Refinement of docked protein–ligand and protein–DNA structures using low frequency normal mode amplitude optimization , 2005, Nucleic acids research.

[36]  S. Lazareno,et al.  Probing of the location of the allosteric site on m1 muscarinic receptors by site-directed mutagenesis. , 1995, Molecular pharmacology.

[37]  A. Getson,et al.  The effects of a selective D4 dopamine receptor antagonist (L-745,870) in acutely psychotic inpatients with schizophrenia. D4 Dopamine Antagonist Group. , 1997, Archives of general psychiatry.

[38]  T. Sakmar,et al.  The Effects of Amino Acid Replacements of Glycine 121 on Transmembrane Helix 3 of Rhodopsin* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[39]  Harel Weinstein,et al.  Ligand Selectivity of D2 Dopamine Receptors Is Modulated by Changes in Local Dynamics Produced by Sodium Binding , 2009, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[40]  Bryan L. Roth,et al.  WAY-100635 is a potent dopamine D4 receptor agonist , 2006, Psychopharmacology.

[41]  W. Sadee,et al.  Mapping the Ligand Binding Pocket of the Human Muscarinic Cholinergic Receptor Hml: Contribution of Tyrosine-82 , 1992, Pharmaceutical Research.

[42]  H. Khorana,et al.  The role of the retinylidene Schiff base counterion in rhodopsin in determining wavelength absorbance and Schiff base pKa. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  D. Colquhoun Pharmacologic Analysis of Drug–Receptor Interaction (3rd edn) , 1998 .