Quantifying lingual coarticulation in German using mutual information: An ultrasound study.

In previous research, mutual information (MI) was employed to quantify the physical information shared between consecutive phonological segments, based on electromagnetic articulography data. In this study, MI is extended to quantifying coarticulatory resistance (CR) versus overlap in German using ultrasound imaging. Two measurements are tested as input to MI: (1) the highest point on the tongue body and (2) the first coefficient of the discrete Fourier transform (DFT) of the whole tongue contour. Both measures are used to examine changes in coarticulation between two time points during the syllable span: the consonant midpoint and the vowel onset. Results corroborate previous findings reporting differences in coarticulatory overlap in German and across languages. Further, results suggest that MI used with the highest point on the tongue body captures distinctions related both to place and manner of articulation, while the first DFT coefficient does not provide any additional information regarding global (whole tongue) as opposed to local (individual articulator) aspects of CR. However, both methods capture temporal distinctions in coarticulatory resistance between the two time points. Results are discussed with respect to the potential of MI measure to provide a way of unifying coarticulation quantification methods across data collection techniques.

[1]  Lucie Ménard,et al.  The development of motor synergies in children: ultrasound and acoustic measurements. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  Phil Hoole,et al.  The coarticulation/invariance scale: mutual information as a measure of coarticulation resistance, motor synergy, and articulatory invariance. , 2013, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[3]  Florian Schiel,et al.  BAS Speech Science Web Services - an Update of Current Developments , 2016, LREC.

[4]  Björn Lindblom,et al.  Dissecting coarticulation: How locus equations happen , 2012, J. Phonetics.

[5]  René Carré,et al.  Locus equations in the light of articulatory modeling , 1997 .

[6]  A Fourier series description of the tongue profile , 2007 .

[8]  Aram Galstyan,et al.  Efficient Estimation of Mutual Information for Strongly Dependent Variables , 2014, AISTATS.

[9]  Reginald D. Smith,et al.  A mutual information approach to calculating nonlinearity , 2015, ArXiv.

[10]  Mark Tiede,et al.  How Do Children Organize Their Speech in the First Years of Life? Insight From Ultrasound Imaging. , 2018, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[11]  S. Öhman.  Coarticulation in VCV Utterances: Spectrographic Measurements , 1966 .

[12]  J. K. Roberts,et al.  Explained Variance in Multilevel Models , 2010 .

[13]  D. Bates,et al.  fitting linear mixed effects models using lme 4 arxiv , 2014 .

[14]  Philip Hoole,et al.  Electromagnetic articulography as a tool in the study of lingual coarticulation , 1990 .

[15]  D. Recasens,et al.  A model of lingual coarticulation based on articulatory constraints , 1997 .

[16]  C A Fowler,et al.  Coordination and Coarticulation in Speech Production , 1993, Language and speech.

[17]  Paul Boersma,et al.  Praat: doing phonetics by computer , 2003 .

[18]  Peter H. Westfall,et al.  Multiple Testing of General Contrasts Using Logical Constraints and Correlations , 1997 .

[19]  Daniel Recasens,et al.  Lingual Articulation and Coarticulation for Catalan Consonants and Vowels: An Ultrasound Study , 2017, Phonetica.

[20]  G. Darbellay.  An estimator of the mutual information based on a criterion for independence , 1999 .

[21]  Ben Maassen,et al.  Coarticulation patterns in children with developmental apraxia of speech , 2002, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[22]  Sang Joon Kim,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Communication , 2006 .

[23]  H. Sussman,et al.  An investigation of locus equations as a source of relational invariance for stop place categorization , 1991 .

[24]  Patricia Shaw,et al.  Analogs of Tahltan Consonant Harmony in English CVC Syllables , 2011, ICPhS.

[25]  D. Recasens.  Coarticulation: Lingual coarticulation , 1999 .

[26]  D H Whalen,et al.  Variability in English vowels is comparable in articulation and acoustics , 2014, Laboratory phonology.

[27]  D H Whalen,et al.  Locus equations are an acoustic expression of articulator synergy. , 2010, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  P. Hoole,et al.  On the lingual organization of the German vowel system. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[29]  C. Fowler,et al.  Coarticulation Resistance of American English Consonants and its Effects on Transconsonantal Vowel-to-Vowel Coarticulation , 2000 .

[30]  Edda Farnetani,et al.  Anticipatory Consonant-to-Vowel Coarticulation in the Production of VCV Sequences In Italian , 1993, Language and speech.

[31]  Lucie Ménard,et al.  Measuring Tongue Shapes and Positions with Ultrasound Imaging: A Validation Experiment Using an Articulatory Model , 2011, Folia Phoniatrica et Logopaedica.

[32]  T. Hothorn,et al.  Simultaneous Inference in General Parametric Models , 2008, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[33]  James M Scobbie,et al.  Articulating five liquids: A single speaker ultrasound study of Malayalam , 2013 .

[34]  Marija Tabain,et al.  Coarticulation in CV syllables: a comparison of Locus Equation and EPG data , 2000, J. Phonetics.

[35]  Mark K. Tiede,et al.  Methods for quantifying tongue shape and complexity using ultrasound imaging , 2016, Clinical linguistics & phonetics.

[36]  Daniel Recasens,et al.  A study on coarticulatory resistance and aggressiveness for front lingual consonants and vowels using ultrasound , 2016, J. Phonetics.

[37]  D. Recasens,et al.  An articulatory investigation of lingual coarticulatory resistance and aggressiveness for consonants and vowels in Catalan. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.