Subordinate’s trust in the supervisor and its impact on organizational effectiveness

This study tested a model of trust-in-supervisor that included propensity to trust and supervisor attributes (i.e., ability, benevolence, and integrity) as antecedents and affective organizational commitment and helping intention as criterion outcomes. A field survey using a structured questionnaire was used to gather data from 255 white-collar employees from diverse occupations and organizations. Path analysis results showed that supervisor ability, benevolence, and integrity as well as employees’ propensity to trust were positively associated with trust-in-supervisor. Trust-in-supervisor, in turn, predicted employees’ affective organizational commitment but did not have any influence on their willingness to help co-workers. Implications of the findings and suggestions for future research are discussed.

[1]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Trust and distrust in organizations: emerging perspectives, enduring questions. , 1999, Annual review of psychology.

[2]  W. Hua A Social Exchange Model of Subordinate's Trust in Supervisors , 2003 .

[3]  Steven C. Currall,et al.  Measuring trust between organizational boundary role persons. , 1995 .

[4]  Tony Simoms,et al.  Behavioral Integrity: The Perceived Alignment Between Managers' Words and Deeds as a Research Focus , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[5]  R. Nyhan Changing the Paradigm , 2000 .

[6]  R. Bies,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behavior: The Good Soldier Syndrome , 1989 .

[7]  J. Rotter A new scale for the measurement of interpersonal trust. , 1967, Journal of personality.

[8]  Larry J. Williams,et al.  Interpersonal, job, and individual factors related to helping processes at work. , 1996 .

[9]  J. George,et al.  Feeling good-doing good: a conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. , 1992, Psychological bulletin.

[10]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[11]  J. Brockner,et al.  When Trust Matters: The Moderating Effect of Outcome Favorability , 1997 .

[12]  Roger C. Mayer,et al.  The trusted general manager and business unit performance: empirical evidence of a competitive advantage , 2000 .

[13]  S. Albrecht,et al.  Trust in public-sector senior management , 2003 .

[14]  Ronald C. Nyhan,et al.  Increasing Affective Organizational Commitment in Public Organizations , 1999 .

[15]  Lynne M. Andersson Employee Cynicism: An Examination Using a Contract Violation Framework , 1996 .

[16]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust , 1998 .

[17]  Concetta A. DePaolo,et al.  Task and Relationship-Oriented Trust In Leaders , 2005 .

[18]  T. Das,et al.  Trust, Control, and Risk in Strategic Alliances: An Integrated Framework , 2001 .

[19]  Daniel G. Bachrach,et al.  Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Critical Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature and Suggestions for Future Research , 2000 .

[20]  Sirkka L. Jarvenpaa,et al.  Is Anybody Out There? Antecedents of Trust in Global Virtual Teams , 1998, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[21]  Jon M. Werner,et al.  Managers as Initiators of Trust: An Exchange Relationship Framework for Understanding Managerial Trustworthy Behavior , 1998 .

[22]  M. Korsgaard,et al.  Trust in the face of conflict: the role of managerial trustworthy behavior and organizational context. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[23]  K. Dirks Trust in leadership and team performance: evidence from NCAA basketball. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[24]  John P. Meyer,et al.  A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment , 1991 .

[25]  S. Robinson Trust and Breach of the Psychological Contract , 1996 .

[26]  R. Peterson,et al.  Task Conflict snd Relationship Conflict in Top Management Teams:The Pivotal Role of Intragroup Trust. , 1998 .

[27]  D. Ferrin,et al.  Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[28]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An Integrative Model Of Organizational Trust , 1995 .

[29]  Julia Connell,et al.  Engendering trust in manager‐subordinate relationships: Predictors and outcomes , 2003 .

[30]  H. Tan,et al.  Toward the differentiation of trust in supervisor and trust in organization. , 2000, Genetic, social, and general psychology monographs.

[31]  John K. Butler Toward Understanding and Measuring Conditions of Trust: Evolution of a Conditions of Trust Inventory , 1991 .

[32]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Transformational Leader Behaviors and Substitutes for Leadership as Determinants of Employee Satisfaction, Commitment, Trust, and Organizational Citizenship Behaviors , 1996 .

[33]  J. H. Davis,et al.  An integrative model of organizational trust, Academy of Management Review, : . , 1995 .

[34]  Zhen Xiong (George) Chen,et al.  Trust as a mediator of the relationship between organizational justice and work outcomes: test of a social exchange model , 2002 .

[35]  J. H. Davis,et al.  The effect of the performance appraisal system on trust for management: A field quasi-experiment. , 1999 .

[36]  E. A. Locke,et al.  Leadership: do traits matter? , 1991 .

[37]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. , 1993 .

[38]  H. Ngo,et al.  Loyalty to supervisor and trust in supervisor of workers in Chinese joint ventures: a test of two competing models , 2002 .

[39]  Chester A. Schriesheim,et al.  Fairness Perceptions and Trust as Mediators for Transformational and Transactional Leadership: A Two-Sample Study , 1999 .

[40]  S. Williams,et al.  Mood and organizational citizenship behavior: the effects of positive affect on employee organizational citizenship behavior intentions. , 1999, The Journal of psychology.

[41]  R. Mayer,et al.  IN MANAGEMENT , 2006 .

[42]  Jay A. Conger,et al.  The dark side of leadership , 1990 .