Biodegradable Conduit Small Gap Tubulization for Peripheral Nerve Mutilation: A Substitute for Traditional Epineurial Neurorrhaphy

Nerve regeneration and re-innervation are usually difficult after peripheral nerve injury. Epineurium neurorrhaphy to recover the nerve continuity is the traditional choice of peripheral nerve mutilation without nerve defects, whereas the functional recovery remains quite unsatisfactory. Based on previous research in SD rats and Rhesus Monkeys, a multiple centers clinical trial about biodegradable conduit small gap tubulization for peripheral nerve mutilation to substitute traditional epineurial neurorrhaphy was carried out. Herein, the authors reviewed the literature that focused on peripheral nerve injury and possible clinical application, and confirmed the clinical possibilities of biodegradable conduit small gap tubulization to substitute traditional epineurial neurorrhaphy for peripheral nerve mutilation. The biodegradable conduit small gap tubulization to substitute traditional epineurial neurorrhaphy for peripheral nerve mutilation may be a revolutionary innovation in peripheral nerve injury and repair field.

[1]  Peixun Zhang,et al.  The Experimental Research of Nerve Fibers Compensation Amplification Innervation of Ular Nerve and Musculocutaneous Nerve in Rhesus Monkeys , 2011, Artificial cells, blood substitutes, and immobilization biotechnology.

[2]  G Lundborg,et al.  A 25-year perspective of peripheral nerve surgery: evolving neuroscientific concepts and clinical significance. , 2000, Journal of Hand Surgery-American Volume.

[3]  C. Zhang,et al.  The Protective Effects of Small Gap Sleeve in Bridging Peripheral Nerve Mutilation , 2009, Artificial cells, blood substitutes, and immobilization biotechnology.

[4]  Tanguy Marqueste,et al.  Functional recovery after peripheral nerve injury and implantation of a collagen guide. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[5]  U. Dicke,et al.  Prefabricated nerve conduits advance histomorphological and functional outcomes in nerve regeneration of the sciatic nerve of the rat. , 2010, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[6]  M. Wiberg,et al.  New Fibrin Conduit for Peripheral Nerve Repair , 2008, Journal of reconstructive microsurgery.

[7]  Peixun Zhang,et al.  Advances in Small Gap Sleeve Bridging Peripheral Nerve Injury , 2010, Artificial cells, blood substitutes, and immobilization biotechnology.

[8]  L. Novikova,et al.  Biodegradable fibrin conduit promotes long-term regeneration after peripheral nerve injury in adult rats. , 2010, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[9]  Peixun Zhang,et al.  The Histological Analysis of Biological Conduit Sleeve Bridging Rhesus Monkey Median Nerve Injury with Small Gap , 2009, Artificial cells, blood substitutes, and immobilization biotechnology.

[10]  C. Zhang,et al.  Early Spatiotemporal Progress of Myelinated Nerve Fiber Regenerating through Biological Chitin Conduit after Injury , 2010, Artificial cells, blood substitutes, and immobilization biotechnology.

[11]  B. Rosén,et al.  Tubular versus conventional repair of median and ulnar nerves in the human forearm: early results from a prospective, randomized, clinical study. , 1997, The Journal of hand surgery.

[12]  Peixun Zhang,et al.  The Electrophysiology Analysis of Biological Conduit Sleeve Bridging Rhesus Monkey Median Nerve Injury with Small Gap , 2008, Artificial cells, blood substitutes, and immobilization biotechnology.

[13]  Maria Siemionow,et al.  Chapter 8: Current techniques and concepts in peripheral nerve repair. , 2009, International review of neurobiology.

[14]  Peixun Zhang,et al.  Bridging small-gap peripheral nerve defects using biodegradable chitin conduits with cultured schwann and bone marrow stromal cells in rats. , 2005, Journal of reconstructive microsurgery.