Use of high potency statins and rates of admission for acute kidney injury: multicenter, retrospective observational analysis of administrative databases

Objective To quantify an association between acute kidney injury and use of high potency statins versus low potency statins. Design Retrospective observational analysis of administrative databases, using nine population based cohort studies and meta-analysis. We performed as treated analyses in each database with a nested case-control design. Rate ratios for different durations of current and past statin exposure to high potency or low potency statins were estimated using conditional logistic regression. Ratios were adjusted for confounding by high dimensional propensity scores. Meta-analytic methods estimated overall effects across participating sites. Setting Seven Canadian provinces and two databases in the United Kingdom and the United States. Participants 2 067 639 patients aged 40 years or older and newly treated with statins between 1 January 1997 and 30 April 2008. Each person hospitalized for acute kidney injury was matched with ten controls. Intervention A dispensing event was new if no cholesterol lowering drug or niacin prescription was dispensed in the previous year. High potency statin treatment was defined as ≥10 mg rosuvastatin, ≥20 mg atorvastatin, and ≥40 mg simvastatin; all other statin treatments were defined as low potency. Statin potency groups were further divided into cohorts with or without chronic kidney disease. Main outcome measure Relative hospitalization rates for acute kidney injury. Results Of more than two million statin users (2 008 003 with non-chronic kidney disease; 59 636 with chronic kidney disease), patients with similar propensity scores were comparable on measured characteristics. Within 120 days of current treatment, there were 4691 hospitalizations for acute kidney injury in patients with non-chronic kidney injury, and 1896 hospitalizations in those with chronic kidney injury. In patients with non-chronic kidney disease, current users of high potency statins were 34% more likely to be hospitalized with acute kidney injury within 120 days after starting treatment (fixed effect rate ratio 1.34, 95% confidence interval 1.25 to 1.43). Users of high potency statins with chronic kidney disease did not have as large an increase in admission rate (1.10, 0.99 to 1.23). χ2 tests for heterogeneity confirmed that the observed association was robust across participating sites. Conclusions Use of high potency statins is associated with an increased rate of diagnosis for acute kidney injury in hospital admissions compared with low potency statins. The effect seems to be strongest in the first 120 days after initiation of statin treatment.

[1]  A. Garg,et al.  Validity of the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision code for acute kidney injury in elderly patients at presentation to the emergency department and at hospital admission , 2012, BMJ Open.

[2]  A. Levy,et al.  CNODES: the Canadian Network for Observational Drug Effect Studies , 2012, Open medicine : a peer-reviewed, independent, open-access journal.

[3]  C. Furberg,et al.  Is lower and lower better and better? A re-evaluation of the evidence from the Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' Collaboration meta-analysis for low-density lipoprotein lowering. , 2012, Journal of clinical lipidology.

[4]  D. Angus,et al.  Association of statin use with risk and outcome of acute kidney injury in community-acquired pneumonia. , 2012, Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN.

[5]  Arsh K Jain,et al.  Statin use associates with a lower incidence of acute kidney injury after major elective surgery. , 2011, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[6]  Y. Homma,et al.  Renal preservation effect of ubiquinol, the reduced form of coenzyme Q10 , 2011, Clinical and Experimental Nephrology.

[7]  R. Herings,et al.  Use of multiple international healthcare databases for the detection of rare drug‐associated outcomes: a pharmacoepidemiological programme comparing rosuvastatin with other marketed statins , 2010, Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety.

[8]  J. McMurray,et al.  Coenzyme Q10, rosuvastatin, and clinical outcomes in heart failure: a pre-specified substudy of CORONA (controlled rosuvastatin multinational study in heart failure). , 2010, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  Carol Coupland,et al.  Unintended effects of statins in men and women in England and Wales: population based cohort study using the QResearch database , 2010, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[10]  P. Coriat,et al.  Perioperative statin therapy is associated with a significant and dose-dependent reduction of adverse cardiovascular outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. , 2009, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[11]  J. Avorn,et al.  High-dimensional Propensity Score Adjustment in Studies of Treatment Effects Using Health Care Claims Data , 2009, Epidemiology.

[12]  P. Libby,et al.  Rosuvastatin to prevent vascular events in men and women with elevated C-reactive protein. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[13]  K. Tremper,et al.  Predictors of Postoperative Acute Renal Failure after Noncardiac Surgery in Patients with Previously Normal Renal Function , 2007, Anesthesiology.

[14]  E. Liberopoulos,et al.  Statin-associated adverse effects beyond muscle and liver toxicity. , 2007, Atherosclerosis.

[15]  Sushrut S Waikar,et al.  Validity of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification Codes for Acute Renal Failure. , 2006, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN.

[16]  Michael C. Wendl,et al.  Argonaute—a database for gene regulation by mammalian microRNAs , 2005, BMC Bioinformatics.

[17]  S. Cockayne,et al.  A randomised controlled trial to assess the effectiveness of offering study results as an incentive to increase response rates to postal questionnaires [ISRCTN26118436] , 2005, BMC medical research methodology.

[18]  R. Karas,et al.  The Safety of Rosuvastatin as Used in Common Clinical Practice: A Postmarketing Analysis , 2005, Circulation.

[19]  S. Wolfe Dangers of rosuvastatin identified before and after FDA approval , 2004, The Lancet.

[20]  A. Rudnicka,et al.  Quantifying effect of statins on low density lipoprotein cholesterol, ischaemic heart disease, and stroke: systematic review and meta-analysis , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[21]  N. Laird,et al.  Meta-analysis in clinical trials. , 1986, Controlled clinical trials.

[22]  C Krogh,et al.  "Compendium of pharmaceuticals and specialties". , 1983, Canadian Medical Association journal.

[23]  Jonathan E. Dickerson,et al.  Supplementary webappendix , 2018 .

[24]  Arthur V. Iansavichus,et al.  Validity of administrative database coding for kidney disease: a systematic review. , 2011, American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation.

[25]  M. Cheitlin Coenzyme Q10, Rosuvastatin, and Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure: A Pre-Specified Substudy of CORONA (Controlled Rosuvastatin Multinational Study in Heart Failure) , 2011 .

[26]  R. Singh,et al.  Randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial of coenzyme Q10 in chronic renal failure : Discovery of a new role , 2000 .