Improving MMS Performance during Infrastructure Surveys through Geometry Aided Design

A Mobile Mapping System (MMS) equipped with laser scanners can collect large volumes of LiDAR data in a short time frame and generate complex 3D models of infrastructure. The performance of the automated algorithms that are developed to extract the infrastructure elements from the point clouds and create these models are largely dependent on the number of pulses striking infrastructure in these clouds. Mobile Mapping Systems have evolved accordingly, adding more and higher specification scanners to achieve the required high point density, however an unanswered question is whether optimising system configuration can achieve similar improvements at no extra cost. This paper presents an approach for improving MMS performance for infrastructure surveys through consideration of scanner orientation, scanner position and scanner operating parameters in a methodology referred to as Geometry Aided Design. A series of tests were designed to measure point cloud characteristics such as point density, point spacing and profile spacing. Three hypothetical MMSs were benchmarked to demonstrate the benefit of Geometry Aided Design for infrastructure surveys. These tests demonstrate that, with the recommended scanner configuration, a MMS, operating one high specification scanner and one low specification scanner, is capable of comparable performance with two high-end systems when benchmarked against a selection of planar, multi-faced and cylindrical targets, resulting in point density improvements in some cases of up to 400%.

[1]  Timothy J McCarthy,et al.  Mobile mapping system performance - an analysis of the effect of laser scanner configuration and vehicle velocity on scan profiles , 2010 .

[2]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  ROAD ENVIRONMENT MAPPING SYSTEM OF THE FINNISH GEODETIC INSTITUTE - FGI ROAMER - , 2007 .

[3]  Fadi Dornaika,et al.  EXTRACTING B UILDING FOOTPRINTS FROM 3D POINT CLOUDS USING TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING AT STREET LEVEL , 2009 .

[4]  Lewis Graham,et al.  Mobile Mapping Systems Overview , 2010 .

[5]  Timothy McCarthy,et al.  Optimising Mobile Mapping System Laser Scanner Orientation , 2015, ISPRS Int. J. Geo Inf..

[6]  Pankaj Kumar,et al.  Initial Results From European Road Safety Inspection (eursi) Mobile Mapping Project , 2010 .

[7]  Timothy J McCarthy,et al.  Calculating the effect of dual-axis scanner rotations and surface orientation on scan profiles , 2011 .

[8]  Timothy McCarthy,et al.  Calculation of Target-Specific Point Distribution for 2D Mobile Laser Scanners , 2014, Sensors.

[9]  Yuwei Chen,et al.  Mobile mapping system and computing methods for modelling of road environment , 2009, 2009 Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event.

[10]  Bharat Lohani,et al.  GENERATING LIDAR DATA IN LABORATORY: LIDAR SIMULATOR , 2007 .

[11]  George Vosselman,et al.  EXTRACTING WINDOWS FROM TERRESTRIAL LASER SCANNING , 2007 .

[12]  Timothy McCarthy,et al.  MIMIC: An Innovative Methodology for Determining Mobile Laser Scanning System Point Density , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[13]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Benchmarking the Performance of Mobile Laser Scanning Systems Using a Permanent Test Field , 2012, Sensors.

[14]  George Vosselman,et al.  Recognizing basic structures from mobile laser scanning data for road inventory studies , 2011 .

[15]  David S. Hurwitz,et al.  Guidelines for the Use of Mobile LIDAR in Transportation Applications , 2013 .

[16]  Norbert Haala,et al.  GRAMMAR SUPPORTED FACADE RECONSTRUCTION FROM MOBILE LIDAR MAPPING , 2009 .

[17]  Timothy McCarthy,et al.  MIMIC: Mobile mapping point density calculator , 2012, COM.Geo '12.

[18]  Juha Hyyppä,et al.  Detection of Vertical Pole-Like Objects in a Road Environment Using Vehicle-Based Laser Scanning Data , 2010, Remote. Sens..

[19]  George Vosselman,et al.  Accuracy of 3D city models: EuroSDR comparison , 2005 .

[20]  D. Shepard A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly-spaced data , 1968, ACM National Conference.

[21]  J. Hyyppä,et al.  Small-footprint laser scanning simulator for system validation, error assessment, and algorithm development. , 2009 .

[22]  Pedro Arias,et al.  Review of mobile mapping and surveying technologies , 2013 .

[23]  Gabriella Caroti,et al.  Accuracy Check of Road’s Cross Slope Evaluation Using MMS Vehicle , 2007 .

[24]  Claus Brenner,et al.  Global Localization of Vehicles Using Local Pole Patterns , 2009, DAGM-Symposium.