The age distribution, rates, and types of surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in the USA

The objective of this study was to describe the distribution of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) surgery across age groups in the USA in 2003. Patients were grouped into four age categories: Reproductive age, perimenopausal, postmenopausal, and elderly. Data from the 2003 National Hospital Discharge Survey and National Census were used to estimate surgical rates by age group. In 2003, 199,698 women underwent a total of 311,587 surgical procedures for POP. Prolapse surgical rates (per 10,000 women) were 7, 24, 31, and 17 in reproductive age, perimenopausal, postmenopausal, and elderly age groups, respectively. Surgical complications occurred in 28.8, 19.6, 18.6, and 22.1% of women in these age groups, respectively. Mortality was uncommon. Although often considered a condition of the elderly, this study suggests that pelvic organ prolapse is a condition affecting women across the reproductive life cycle and for which women of all ages seek surgical treatment.

[1]  J. Delancey,et al.  Pelvic organ prolapse in young women , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  J. Benson,et al.  Vaginal versus abdominal reconstructive surgery for the treatment of pelvic support defects: a prospective randomized study with long-term outcome evaluation. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  S. Topuz,et al.  Perioperative complications in abdominal sacrocolpopexy and vaginal sacrospinous ligament fixation procedures , 2007, International Urogynecology Journal.

[4]  S. Güçlü,et al.  Risk factors for pelvic surgery , 2002, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[5]  H. Gürel,et al.  Pelvic relaxation and associated risk factors, The results of logistic regression analysis , 1999, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[6]  A. O'Boyle,et al.  Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): the distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. , 2005, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  J. Colling,et al.  Epidemiology of Surgically Managed Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Urinary Incontinence , 1997, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  M. Harvey,et al.  A review of the epidemiology and pathophysiology of pelvic floor dysfunction: do racial differences matter? , 2005, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC.

[9]  C. Bradley,et al.  Incontinence surgery in the older woman. , 2006, Current opinion in urology.

[10]  Y. Lukman.  Utero-vaginal prolapse: a rural disability of the young. , 1995, East African medical journal.

[11]  Graves Ej,et al.  National Hospital Discharge Survey , 2004 .

[12]  M. Barber,et al.  Quality of life after surgery for genital prolapse in elderly women: obliterative and reconstructive surgery , 2007, International Urogynecology Journal.

[13]  F. Gyntelberg,et al.  Heavy lifting at work and risk of genital prolapse and herniated lumbar disc in assistant nurses. , 1994, Occupational medicine.

[14]  K. Schweitzer,et al.  Surgery for pelvic organ prolapse in women of 80 years of age and older , 2005, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[15]  K. Carlson,et al.  Indications for hysterectomy. , 1993, The New England journal of medicine.

[16]  L. Brubaker,et al.  The standardization of terminology of female pelvic organ prolapse and pelvic floor dysfunction. , 1996, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[17]  R. Pokras,et al.  Design and operation of the National Hospital Discharge Survey: 1988 redesign. , 2000, Vital and health statistics. Ser. 1, Programs and collection procedures.

[18]  S. Swift,et al.  The distribution of pelvic organ support in a population of female subjects seen for routine gynecologic health care. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.