English as a Mixed V2 Grammar: Synchronic Word Order Inconsistencies from the Perspective of First Language Acquisition

English as a Mixed V2 Grammar: Synchronic Word Order Inconsistencies from the Perspective of First Language Acquisition This paper discusses some word order inconsistencies found in present-day English and argues that these may be explained by natural processes in first language acquisition. English is usually assumed to have lost its verb-second (V2) properties in the Middle English period, but the paper argues that English should be considered a mixed V2 grammar, as subject-auxiliary inversion is still a syntactic requirement in all questions and a type of inversion also marginally appears in certain declaratives (with informationally light verbs). Discussing word order variation across Germanic V2 languages as well as some acquisition data, the paper develops an approach to language acquisition and change which is based on micro-cues expressed in the input. This means that there are many types of V2 grammars, which distinguish between different clause types, patterns of information structure, and natural classes of categories. In this model, historical gradualism is seen as successive changes affecting one micro-cue at a time, and the mixed V2 property of English is considered to represent no exceptional case, simply a somewhat more restricted V2 grammar than that of the other Germanic languages.

[1]  Thomas Roeper.  Universal bilingualism , 1999 .

[2]  A. Kroch,et al.  Verb Movement in Old and Middle English: Dialect Variation and Language Contact , 1997 .

[3]  Marit Westergaard,et al.  Triggering V2: The Amount of Input Needed for Parameter Setting in a Split-CP Model of Word Order , 2005 .

[4]  B. Kortmann,et al.  Indian English: syntax , 2008 .

[5]  A. Radford,et al.  The syntax of questions in child English , 1994, Journal of Child Language.

[6]  B. MacWhinney.  The CHILDES project: tools for analyzing talk , 1992 .

[7]  Joan Bresnan.  Locative Inversion and the Architecture of Universal Grammar. , 1994 .

[8]  Andrew Radford,et al.  The Acquisition of the Morphosyntax of Finite Verbs in English , 1992 .

[9]  Anna L. Theakston,et al.  Determinants of acquisition order in wh-questions: re-evaluating the role of caregiver speech , 2003, Journal of Child Language.

[10]  Robert D. van Valin,et al.  The development of subject-auxiliary inversion in English wh-questions: an alternative analysis. , 2002 .

[11]  David Lightfoot,et al.  How New Languages Emerge , 2006 .

[12]  Marit Westergaard.  LEARNING AND UNLEARNING V2: ON THE ROBUSTNESS OF THE TRIGGERING EXPERIENCE IN A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE , 2006 .

[13]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Chapter 6. Psycholinguistic Evidence and the Description of V-Second Phenomena in German , 1986 .

[14]  Marit Westergaard,et al.  The (Non-) Effect of Input Frequency on the Acquisition of Word Order in Norwegian Embedded Clauses , 2005 .

[15]  S. Thompson,et al.  Discourse description : diverse linguistic analyses of a fund-raising text , 1992 .

[16]  G. Salvi,et al.  Current Studies in Italian Syntax , 2001 .

[17]  B. Levin.  Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface , 1994 .

[18]  L. Uyechi,et al.  Reality Exploration and Discovery: Pattern Interaction in Language & Life , 2008 .

[19]  A. Kemenade.  Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English , 1987 .

[20]  J. Bresnan,et al.  The Gradience of the Dative Alternation , 2008 .

[21]  C. Poletto.  Old Italian Scrambling: the low left periphery of the clause , 2006 .

[22]  Anca-Marina Velicu,et al.  THE STRUCTURE OF CP AND IP THE CARTOGRAPHY OF SYNTACTIC STRUCTURES , 2005 .

[23]  E. Prince.  The ZPG Letter: Subjects, Definiteness, and Information-status , 1992 .

[24]  Jürgen M. Meisel,et al.  The Acquisition of verb placement : functional categories and V2 phenomena in language acquisition , 1996 .

[25]  Merete Anderssen,et al.  The Acquisition of Compositional Definiteness in Norwegian , 2007 .

[26]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Functional Categories in Early Child German , 1993 .

[27]  Marit Westergaard,et al.  Wh-questions, V2, and the Left Periphery of Three Norwegian Dialect types , 2005 .

[28]  Hubert Haider,et al.  Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages , 1986 .

[29]  Betty J. Birner.  Pragmatic constraints on the verb in English inversion , 1995 .

[30]  Eric Haeberli,et al.  Inflectional Morphology and the Loss of Verb-Second in English , 2002 .

[31]  Marit Westergaard,et al.  Word order in wh-questions in a North Norwegian dialect: some evidence from an acquisition study , 2003, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[32]  Øystein Alexander Vangsnes,et al.  Microparameters for Norwegian wh-grammars* , 2005 .

[33]  Susan Pintzuk,et al.  Phrase Structures in Competition: Variation and Change in Old English Word Order , 1999 .

[34]  L. Rizzi.  The Fine Structure of the Left Periphery , 1997 .

[35]  The development of inversion in wh-questions: a reply to Van Valin , 2003, Journal of Child Language.

[36]  A note on Old English and Old Norse initial adverbials and word order with special reference to sentence adverbials , 1994 .

[37]  David Lightfoot,et al.  The development of language , 1999 .

[38]  J. Pine,et al.  Subject–auxiliary inversion errors and wh-question acquisition: ‘what children do know?’ , 2000, Journal of Child Language.

[39]  Marit Westergaard.  Norwegian child language and the history of English : The interaction of syntax and information structure in the development of word order 1 , 2005 .

[40]  R. Brown,et al.  A First Language , 1973 .

[41]  Anna-Lena Wiklund,et al.  The Tromsø guide to Scandinavian verb movement , 2006 .

[42]  Kristine Bentzen,et al.  What's the better move? On verb placement in Standard and Northern Norwegian , 2005, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[43]  Tom Roeper.  What frequency can do and what it can't , 2007 .

[44]  Marit Westergaard.  Optional word order in wh-questions in two Norwegian dialects: a diachronic analysis of synchronic variation , 2005, Nordic Journal of Linguistics.

[45]  Noam Chomsky.  Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use , 1988 .

[46]  Hans den Besten,et al.  On the Interaction of Root Transformations and Lexical Deletive Rules , 1983 .

[47]  C. Poletto,et al.  Topic, Focus and V2: defining the CP sublayers , 2004 .

[48]  Kristin Bech.  Word order patterns in Old and Middle English. A syntactic and pragmatic study. , 2001 .

[49]  D. Lightfoot.  The development of language , 1999 .

[50]  G. Salvi,et al.  Some firm points on Latin word order: The left periphery , 2005 .

[51]  Katalin É. Kiss,et al.  Universal grammar in the reconstruction of ancient languages , 2005 .