Factor of two : halving the fuel consumption of new U.S. Automobiles by 2035

The chapter describes how the United States (U.S.) transport sector is almost totally dependent on gasoline and diesel fuel refined from oil to provide the remarkable mobility provided by the automobile. This dependence presents a challenging energy and environmental problem, as the transportation sector is responsible for two-thirds of total petroleum consumption and a third of the nation’s carbon emissions. Amid growing concerns over energy security, and the impacts of global climate change, the U.S. Congress in December 2007 adopted a new legislative directive to increase the fuel economy of new passenger vehicles over the next two decades. Transportation experts at the Laboratory for Energy and Environment, part of the Massachusetts Instute of Technology (MIT) in Cambridge, Massachusetts, have examined the vehicle design and sales mix changes necessary to double the average fuel economy or halve the fuel consumption of new light duty vehicles (LDVs)—including cars, station wagons, sport utility vehicles (SUVs), pickup trucks and vans—by model year 2035. In order to achieve this factor of two target, three technology options that are available and can be implemented on a large scale were evaluated: (1) channeling future vehicle technical efficiency improvements to reducing fuel consumption rather than improving vehicle performance; (2) increasing the market share of diesel, turbocharged gasoline and hybrid electric gasoline propulsion systems; and (3) reducing vehicle size and weight.

[1]  Pushpam Kumar Agriculture (Chapter8) in IPCC, 2007: Climate change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[2]  P. Bosch,et al.  Climate change 2007 - mitigation of climate change , 2007 .

[3]  K. Small,et al.  Fuel Efficiency and Motor Vehicle Travel: The Declining Rebound Effect , 2007, Controlling Automobile Air Pollution.

[4]  John B. Heywood,et al.  ON THE ROAD IN 2020 - A LIFE-CYCLE ANALYSIS OF NEW AUTOMOBILE TECHNOLOGIES , 2000 .

[5]  Ye Wu,et al.  Development and applications of GREET 2.7 -- The Transportation Vehicle-CycleModel. , 2006 .

[6]  John M. DeCicco,et al.  Trends in Technical Efficiency Trade-Offs for the U.S. Light Vehicle Fleet , 2007 .

[7]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Comparative Analysis of Automotive Powertrain Choices for the Next 25 Years , 2007 .

[8]  D. Greene,et al.  Energy efficiency and consumption — the rebound effect — a survey , 2000 .

[9]  Kurt Van Dender,et al.  The Effect of Improved Fuel Economy on Vehicle Miles Traveled: Estimating the Rebound Effect Using U.S. State Data, 1966-2001 , 2005 .

[10]  Marc Ross,et al.  Vehicle design and the physics of traffic safety , 2006 .

[11]  Anant D Vyas,et al.  Lightweight materials in the light-duty passenger vehicle market: Their market penetration potential and impacts , 1995 .

[12]  Anant D Vyas,et al.  Comparison of indirect cost multipliers for vehicle manufacturing , 2000 .

[13]  Stacy Cagle Davis,et al.  Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 26 , 2007 .

[14]  Dagobert L. Brito,et al.  Fuel Efficiency and Motor Vehicle Travel : The Declining Rebound Effect , 2007 .

[15]  S Lu,et al.  Vehicle Survivability and Travel Mileage Schedules , 2006 .