UH-60 Partial Authority Modernized Control Laws for Improved Handling Qualities in the Degraded Visual Environment

The U.S. Army’s helicopter fleet consists chiefly of aircraft developed in the 1960’s and 1970’s with flight control systems based on the requirements of that time. Since then, Army helicopter operations have changed from predominantly daytime, good visual environment (GVE) operations to night and degraded visual environment (DVE) operations. Rotorcraft handling qualities and flight control requirements did not address DVE operations until the introduction of ADS-33 in 1985. Numerous attempts to improve the handling qualities of rotorcraft in the DVE through flight control upgrades have been studied with the CH-47F DAFCS representing a successful partial-authority solution. In 2000, AFDD and Sikorsky developed the UH-60 Modernized Control Laws (MCLAWS) which were intended to satisfy the ADS-33 DVE requirements using the existing limited-authority actuators. While the original program ended in 2003, the effort was resumed at AFDD in 2012 with numerous improvements incorporated into the MCLAWS. Flight tests in brownout conditions at Yuma Proving Ground demonstrated that the MCLAWS resulted in reduced the pilot workload when compared to the legacy UH-60 SAS/FPS control system. A handling qualities evaluation conducted at Moffett Field in simulated DVE conditions on five ADS-33 mission task elements demonstrated Level 1 handling qualities.

[1]  Mark B. Tischler,et al.  Aircraft and Rotorcraft System Identification: Engineering Methods with Flight-Test Examples , 2006 .

[2]  Mark B. Tischler,et al.  Development of Modern Control Laws for the AH-64D in Hover/Low Speed Flight , 2006 .

[3]  James Savage,et al.  3D-LZ Flight Test of 2013: Landing an EH-60L Helicopter in a Brownout Degraded Visual Environment , 2014 .

[4]  David G. Mitchell,et al.  Test Guide for ADS-33E-PRF , 2008 .

[5]  Marc Höfinger.  ADS-33E-PRF - Aeronautical Design Standard, Performance Specification, Handling Qualities Requirements for Military Rotorcraft , 2005 .

[6]  Mohammadreza,et al.  UH-60M Upgrade Fly-By-Wire Flight Control Risk Reduction using the RASCAL JUH-60A In-Flight Simulator , 2008 .

[7]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[8]  David,et al.  ADS-33E Predicted and Assigned Low-Speed Handling Qualities of the CH-47F with Digital AFCS , 2007 .

[9]  Christina M. Ivler,et al.  Handling-Qualities Optimization and Trade-offs in Rotorcraft Flight Control Design , 2008 .

[10]  Loran A. Haworth,et al.  Aeronautical Design Standard for Helmet Mounted Display Symbology , 1993 .

[11]  Mike,et al.  Balancing CH-53K Handling Qualities and Stability Margin Requirements in the Presence of Heavy External Loads , 2007 .

[12]  Jay W. Fletcher,et al.  Improving Helicopter Flight Mechanics Models with Laser Measurements of Blade Flapping , 1997 .

[13]  Dennis Lindell,et al.  Study on Rotorcraft Safety and Survivability , 2010 .

[14]  Christina M. Ivler,et al.  Flight Control Development for the ARH-70 Armed Reconnaissance Helicopter Program , 2008 .

[15]  Mark B. Tischler,et al.  Response Type Tradeoffs in Helicopter Handling Qualities for the GVE , 2011 .

[16]  Mark B. Tischler,et al.  Modernized Control Laws for UH-60 BLACK HAWK Optimization and Flight-Test Results , 2005 .

[17]  Aleksandar Bengin,et al.  Mathematical models of helicopter flight dynamics , 2002 .

[18]  Chris L. Blanken,et al.  Improved Handling Qualities for the OH-58D Kiowa Warrior in the Degraded Visual Environment , 2011 .

[19]  George E. Cooper,et al.  The use of pilot rating in the evaluation of aircraft handling qualities , 1969 .