Evaluation of land-surface interaction in ECMWF and NCEP/NCAR reanalysis models over grassland (FIFE) and boreal forest (BOREAS)

The National Center for Environmental Prediction and National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCEP/NCAR) and European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalysis models are compared with First ISLSCP (International Satellite Land Surface Climatology Project) Field Experiment (FIFE) grassland data from Kansas in 1987 and Boreal Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study (BOREAS) data from an old black spruce site in 1996 near Thompson, Manitoba. Some aspects of the comparison are similar for the two ecosystems. Over grassland and after snowmelt in the boreal forest, both models represent the seasonal cycle of near-surface temperature well. The two models have quite different soil hydrology components. The ECMWF model includes soil water nudging based on low level humidity errors. While this works quite well for the FIFE grassland, it appears to give too high evaporation over the boreal forest. The NCEP/NCAR model constrains long-term drifts by nudging deep soil water toward climatology. Over the FIFE site, this seems to give too low evaporation in midsummer, while at the BOREAS site, evaporation in this model is high. Both models have some difficulty representing the surface diurnal cycle of humidity. In the NCEP/NCAR reanalysis this leads to errors primarily in June, when the surface boundary layer stays saturated and too much precipitation occurs. In the ECMWF reanalysis there is a morning peak of mixing ratio, which an earlier work showed resulted from too shallow a boundary layer in the morning. Over the northern boreal forest there are important physical processes, which are not represented in either reanalysis model. In particular very high model albedos in spring, when there is snow under the forest canopy, lead to a very low daytime net radiation. This in turn leads to a large underestimate of the daytime surface fluxes, particularly the sensible heat flux, and to daytime model surface temperatures that are as much as 15 K low. In addition, the models do not account for the reduction in evaporation associated with frozen soil, and they generally have too large evapotranspiration in June and July, probably because they do not model the tight stomatal control of the coniferous forest.

[1]  Alan K. Betts,et al.  The FIFE surface diurnal cycle climate , 1995 .

[2]  K. Mitchell,et al.  Assessment of the Land Surface and Boundary Layer Models in Two Operational Versions of the NCEP Eta Model Using FIFE Data , 1997 .

[3]  F. Chapin,et al.  Boreal forest and tundra ecosystems as components of the climate system , 1995 .

[4]  Mojib Latif,et al.  The Effect of Eurasian Snow Cover on Regional and Global Climate Variations , 1989 .

[5]  Alan K. Betts,et al.  Comparison between the land surface response of the ECMWF model and the FIFE‐1987 data , 1993 .

[6]  Alan G. Barr,et al.  Comparison of regional surface fluxes from boundary-layer budgets and aircraft measurements above boreal forest , 1997 .

[7]  G. Bonan,et al.  Effects of boreal forest vegetation on global climate , 1992, Nature.

[8]  Alan K. Betts,et al.  FIFE Surface Climate and Site-Average Dataset 1987–89 , 1998 .

[9]  Pedro Viterbo,et al.  Comparison of the Land-Surface Interaction in the ECMWF Reanalysis Model with the 1987 FIFE Data , 1998 .

[10]  H. Pan,et al.  Nonlocal Boundary Layer Vertical Diffusion in a Medium-Range Forecast Model , 1996 .

[11]  R. Reynolds,et al.  The NCEP/NCAR 40-Year Reanalysis Project , 1996, Renewable Energy.

[12]  Alan K. Betts,et al.  Albedo over the boreal forest , 1997 .

[13]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Controls on Evaporation in a Boreal Spruce Forest. , 1999 .

[14]  Song-You Hong,et al.  Comparison of NCEP-NCAR Reanalysis with 1987 FIFE Data , 1996 .

[15]  Pedro Viterbo,et al.  An Improved Land Surface Parameterization Scheme in the ECMWF Model and Its Validation. , 1995 .

[16]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Physiological responses of a black spruce forest to weather , 1997 .

[17]  Alan K. Betts.  Climate-Convection Feedbacks: Some Further Issues , 1998 .

[18]  G. Thomas,et al.  The Boreal Forests and Climate , 1992 .

[19]  Pedro Viterbo,et al.  The land surface‐atmosphere interaction: A review based on observational and global modeling perspectives , 1996 .

[20]  Y. Xue,et al.  Modeling of land surface evaporation by four schemes and comparison with FIFE observations , 1996 .

[21]  A. Betts,et al.  Surface Energy and Water Balance for the Arkansas-Red River Basin from the ECMWF Reanalysis , 1998 .

[22]  David Rind,et al.  The effect of snow cover on the climate , 1991 .