Targeted Proteomics Identifies Proteomic Signatures in Liquid Biopsies of the Endometrium to Diagnose Endometrial Cancer and Assist in the Prediction of the Optimal Surgical Treatment

Purpose: Endometrial cancer (EC) diagnosis relies on the observation of tumor cells in endometrial biopsies obtained by aspiration (i.e., uterine aspirates), but it is associated with 22% undiagnosed patients and up to 50% of incorrectly assigned EC histotype and grade. We aimed to identify biomarker signatures in the fluid fraction of these biopsies to overcome these limitations. Experimental Design: The levels of 52 proteins were measured in the fluid fraction of uterine aspirates from 116 patients by LC-PRM, the latest generation of targeted mass-spectrometry acquisition. A logistic regression model was used to assess the power of protein panels to differentiate between EC and non-EC patients and between EC histologic subtypes. The robustness of the panels was assessed by the "leave-one-out" cross-validation procedure performed within the same cohort of patients and an independent cohort of 38 patients. Results: The levels of 28 proteins were significantly higher in patients with EC (n = 69) compared with controls (n = 47). The combination of MMP9 and KPYM exhibited 94% sensitivity and 87% specificity for detecting EC cases. This panel perfectly complemented the standard diagnosis, achieving 100% of correct diagnosis in this dataset. Nine proteins were significantly increased in endometrioid EC (n = 49) compared with serous EC (n = 20). The combination of CTNB1, XPO2, and CAPG achieved 95% sensitivity and 96% specificity for the discrimination of these subtypes. Conclusions: We developed two uterine aspirate-based signatures to diagnose EC and classify tumors in the most prevalent histologic subtypes. This will improve diagnosis and assist in the prediction of the optimal surgical treatment. Clin Cancer Res; 23(21); 6458–67. ©2017 AACR.

[1]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[2]  K. Astrup,et al.  Frequency of spontaneously occurring postmenopausal bleeding in the general population , 2004, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[3]  E. DeLong,et al.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. , 1988, Biometrics.

[4]  A. Jemal,et al.  Cancer statistics, 2017 , 2017, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[5]  Ibrahim Anwar Abdelazim,et al.  Pipelle endometrial sampling versus conventional dilatation & curettage in patients with abnormal uterine bleeding. , 2013, Journal of the Turkish German Gynecological Association.

[6]  S. Shivaji,et al.  Proteome of human endometrium: Identification of differentially expressed proteins in proliferative and secretory phase endometrium , 2010, Proteomics. Clinical applications.

[7]  Bruno Domon,et al.  Advances in high‐resolution accurate mass spectrometry application to targeted proteomics , 2015, Proteomics.

[8]  N. Dubrawsky Cancer statistics , 1989, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[9]  L. Mattsson,et al.  Histopathological findings in women with postmenopausal bleeding , 1995, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[10]  Walter Birchmeier,et al.  Balancing cell adhesion and Wnt signaling, the key role of β-catenin , 2006 .

[11]  Deanna Telner,et al.  Approach to diagnosis and management of abnormal uterine bleeding. , 2007, Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien.

[12]  T. Colgan,et al.  Absolute quantification of potential cancer markers in clinical tissue homogenates using multiple reaction monitoring on a hybrid triple quadrupole/linear ion trap tandem mass spectrometer. , 2009, Analytical chemistry.

[13]  M. Jiang,et al.  Cellular apoptosis susceptibility (CSE1L/CAS) protein in cancer metastasis and chemotherapeutic drug-induced apoptosis , 2010, Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR.

[14]  D. Sabatini,et al.  Cancer Cell Metabolism: Warburg and Beyond , 2008, Cell.

[15]  J. Gupta,et al.  Accuracy of outpatient endometrial biopsy in the diagnosis of endometrial cancer: a systematic quantitative review , 2002, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[16]  T. Herzog,et al.  Endometrial cancer: a review and current management strategies: part I. , 2014, Gynecologic oncology.

[17]  J. Quigley,et al.  Matrix metalloproteinases and tumor metastasis , 2006, Cancer and Metastasis Reviews.

[18]  J. Lacey,et al.  Endometrial hyperplasia and the risk of progression to carcinoma. , 2009, Maturitas.

[19]  Steven J. M. Jones,et al.  Integrated genomic characterization of endometrial carcinoma , 2013, Nature.

[20]  E. Noordijk,et al.  Nuclear beta-catenin is a molecular feature of type I endometrial carcinoma. , 2003, The Journal of pathology.

[21]  R. Soslow,et al.  β-Catenin and E-Cadherin Expression Patterns in High-Grade Endometrial Carcinoma Are Associated with Histological Subtype , 2002, Modern Pathology.

[22]  M. C. Terek,et al.  Diagnostic and prognostic values of preoperative serum levels of YKL-40, HE-4 and DKK-3 in endometrial cancer. , 2016, Gynecologic oncology.

[23]  S. Ghanny,et al.  Verification of endometrial tissue biomarkers previously discovered using mass spectrometry-based proteomics by means of immunohistochemistry in a tissue microarray format. , 2007, Journal of proteome research.

[24]  Walter Birchmeier,et al.  Balancing cell adhesion and Wnt signaling, the key role of beta-catenin. , 2006, Current opinion in genetics & development.

[25]  S. Skates,et al.  Development of multimarker panel for early detection of endometrial cancer. High diagnostic power of prolactin. , 2007, Gynecologic oncology.

[26]  Jason D. Wright,et al.  Comparative Performance of the 2009 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics' Staging System for Uterine Corpus Cancer. , 2011, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[27]  P. E. Van den Steen,et al.  Biochemistry and molecular biology of gelatinase B or matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9): The next decade , 2013, Critical reviews in biochemistry and molecular biology.

[28]  Patrick Neven,et al.  Endometrial cancer. , 2005, Lancet.

[29]  Jörg Grigull,et al.  Endometrial Carcinoma Biomarker Discovery and Verification Using Differentially Tagged Clinical Samples with Multidimensional Liquid Chromatography and Tandem Mass Spectrometry*S , 2007, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[30]  B. Domon,et al.  Detection and quantification of proteins in clinical samples using high resolution mass spectrometry. , 2015, Methods.

[31]  T. Fehm,et al.  Macrophage Capping Protein CapG Is a Putative Oncogene Involved in Migration and Invasiveness in Ovarian Carcinoma , 2014, BioMed research international.

[32]  T. Enomoto,et al.  Serum Biomarkers for Early Detection of Gynecologic Cancers , 2010, Cancers.

[33]  Ian Todd,et al.  ELISA in the multiplex era: Potentials and pitfalls , 2015, Proteomics. Clinical applications.

[34]  A. García,et al.  Molecular pathology of endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma. , 2001, Human pathology.

[35]  Jin-Ju Kim,et al.  Endometrial evaluation with transvaginal ultrasonography for the screening of endometrial hyperplasia or cancer in premenopausal and perimenopausal women , 2016, Obstetrics & gynecology science.

[36]  R. Kimmig,et al.  Cellular Apoptosis Susceptibility Gene Expression in Endometrial Carcinoma: Correlation With Bcl-2, Bax, and Caspase-3 Expression and Outcome , 2001, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[37]  I. Căruntu,et al.  Immunohistochemical analysis of steroid receptors, proliferation markers, apoptosis related molecules, and gelatinases in non-neoplastic and neoplastic endometrium. , 2011, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[38]  Benjamin E. Gross,et al.  Integrative Analysis of Complex Cancer Genomics and Clinical Profiles Using the cBioPortal , 2013, Science Signaling.

[39]  Gloria S. Huang,et al.  Accuracy of preoperative endometrial sampling for the detection of high-grade endometrial tumors. , 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[40]  D. Kiresi,et al.  Evaluation of endometrial thickness with transvaginal ultrasonography and histopathology in premenopausal women with abnormal vaginal bleeding , 2010, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[41]  S. Nofech-Mozes,et al.  Assessment of endometrial sampling as a predictor of final surgical pathology in endometrial cancer , 2010, British Journal of Cancer.

[42]  Gerben ter Riet,et al.  Endometrial Thickness Measurement for Detecting Endometrial Cancer in Women With Postmenopausal Bleeding: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[43]  Xavier Robin,et al.  pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves , 2011, BMC Bioinformatics.

[44]  J. Quinlivan,et al.  Endometrial adenocarcinoma ‐ presenting pathology is a poor guide to surgical management , 2000, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[45]  S. Pecorelli Corrigendum to “Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the vulva, cervix, and endometrium” , 2010 .

[46]  R. Bamezai,et al.  Pyruvate kinase M2 and cancer: an updated assessment , 2014, FEBS letters.

[47]  U. Brinkmann,et al.  CSE1L/CAS: Its role in proliferation and apoptosis , 2004, Apoptosis.

[48]  Bruno Domon,et al.  Development of a sequential workflow based on LC-PRM for the verification of endometrial cancer protein biomarkers in uterine aspirate samples , 2016, Oncotarget.

[49]  Steven A Carr,et al.  Protein biomarker discovery and validation: the long and uncertain path to clinical utility , 2006, Nature Biotechnology.

[50]  C. Creutzberg,et al.  Nuclear β‐catenin is a molecular feature of type I endometrial carcinoma , 2003 .

[51]  Tom Fawcett,et al.  An introduction to ROC analysis , 2006, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[52]  B. Domon,et al.  Recent advances in targeted proteomics for clinical applications , 2015, Proteomics. Clinical applications.