Imaging-based enrichment criteria using deep learning algorithms for efficient clinical trials in mild cognitive impairment

The mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage of Alzheimer's disease (AD) may be optimal for clinical trials to test potential treatments for preventing or delaying decline to dementia. However, MCI is heterogeneous in that not all cases progress to dementia within the time frame of a trial and some may not have underlying AD pathology. Identifying those MCIs who are most likely to decline during a trial and thus most likely to benefit from treatment will improve trial efficiency and power to detect treatment effects. To this end, using multimodal, imaging‐derived, inclusion criteria may be especially beneficial. Here, we present a novel multimodal imaging marker that predicts future cognitive and neural decline from [F‐18]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET), amyloid florbetapir PET, and structural magnetic resonance imaging, based on a new deep learning algorithm (randomized denoising autoencoder marker, rDAm). Using ADNI2 MCI data, we show that using rDAm as a trial enrichment criterion reduces the required sample estimates by at least five times compared with the no‐enrichment regime and leads to smaller trials with high statistical power, compared with existing methods.

[1]  Nick C Fox,et al.  Automatic classification of MR scans in Alzheimer's disease. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Deep Learning-Based Feature Representation for AD/MCI Classification , 2013, MICCAI.

[3]  Vikas Singh,et al.  Predictive markers for AD in a multi-modality framework: An analysis of MCI progression in the ADNI population , 2011, NeuroImage.

[4]  Jeannie-Marie S. Leoutsakos,et al.  Simulating effects of biomarker enrichment on Alzheimer's disease prevention trials: Conceptual framework and example , 2014, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[5]  Nick C Fox,et al.  The Diagnosis of Mild Cognitive Impairment due to Alzheimer’s Disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association Workgroups on Diagnostic Guidelines for Alzheimer’s Disease , 2011 .

[6]  Pascal Vincent,et al.  Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[7]  Daoqiang Zhang,et al.  Multimodal classification of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment , 2011, NeuroImage.

[8]  M. Donohue,et al.  Enrichment through biomarkers in clinical trials of Alzheimer's drugs in patients with mild cognitive impairment , 2010, Neurobiology of Aging.

[9]  A. Mitchell,et al.  Rate of progression of mild cognitive impairment to dementia – meta‐analysis of 41 robust inception cohort studies , 2009, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[10]  Vikas Singh,et al.  MKL-Based Sample Enrichment and Customized Outcomes Enable Smaller AD Clinical Trials , 2011, MLINI.

[11]  B. Winblad,et al.  Clinical trials in mild cognitive impairment: lessons for the future , 2005, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[12]  Clifford R. Jack,et al.  Operationalizing hippocampal volume as an enrichment biomarker for amnestic mild cognitive impairment trials: effect of algorithm, test-retest variability, and cut point on trial cost, duration, and sample size , 2014, Neurobiology of Aging.

[13]  Vikas Singh,et al.  Randomized Denoising Autoencoders for Smaller and Efficient Imaging Based AD Clinical Trials , 2014, MICCAI.

[14]  P. Aisen Clinical trial methodologies for disease-modifying therapeutic approaches , 2011, Neurobiology of Aging.

[15]  M. Bondi,et al.  Susceptibility of the conventional criteria for mild cognitive impairment to false-positive diagnostic errors , 2015, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[16]  Javier Escudero,et al.  Machine Learning classification of MRI features of Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment subjects to reduce the sample size in clinical trials , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[17]  Mark E. Schmidt,et al.  The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: A review of papers published since its inception , 2012, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[18]  A. Berger FUNDAMENTALS OF BIOSTATISTICS , 1969 .

[19]  Pascal Vincent,et al.  Stacked Denoising Autoencoders: Learning Useful Representations in a Deep Network with a Local Denoising Criterion , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[20]  Ronald C Petersen,et al.  Mild cognitive impairment: current research and clinical implications. , 2007, Seminars in neurology.

[21]  Bernard R. Rosner,et al.  Fundamentals of Biostatistics. , 1992 .

[22]  Laura Fratiglioni,et al.  APOE genotype, family history of dementia, and Alzheimer disease risk: a 6-year follow-up study. , 2004, Archives of neurology.

[23]  J. Morris,et al.  The diagnosis of dementia due to Alzheimer’s disease: Recommendations from the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association workgroups on diagnostic guidelines for Alzheimer's disease , 2011, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[24]  Valerie Carr,et al.  High-resolution imaging of medial temporal lobe subfield structure and function in mild cognitive impairment , 2013, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[25]  C. Jack,et al.  Boosting power for clinical trials using classifiers based on multiple biomarkers , 2010, Neurobiology of Aging.

[26]  S. Monsell,et al.  Choosing Alzheimer's disease prevention clinical trial populations , 2014, Neurobiology of Aging.

[27]  M. Carrillo,et al.  CSF biomarker variability in the Alzheimer's Association quality control program , 2013, Alzheimer's & Dementia.

[28]  Liana G. Apostolova,et al.  Estimating sample sizes for predementia Alzheimer's trials based on the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative , 2013, Neurobiology of Aging.

[29]  C. Jack,et al.  Tracking pathophysiological processes in Alzheimer's disease: an updated hypothetical model of dynamic biomarkers , 2013, The Lancet Neurology.

[30]  Yoshua. Bengio,et al.  Learning Deep Architectures for AI , 2007, Found. Trends Mach. Learn..