Physical and optical properties of 2010 Eyjafjallajökull volcanic eruption aerosol: ground-based, Lidar and airborne measurements in France

Abstract. During the Eyjafjallajokull eruption (14 April to 24 May 2010), the volcanic aerosol cloud was observed across Europe by several airborne in situ and ground-based remote-sensing instruments. On 18 and 19 May, layers of depolarizing particles (i.e. non-spherical particles) were detected in the free troposphere above the Puy de Dome station, (PdD, France) with a Rayleigh-Mie LIDAR emitting at a wavelength of 355 nm, with parallel and crossed polarization channels. These layers in the free troposphere (FT) were also well captured by simulations with the Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART, which furthermore showed that the ash was eventually entrained into the planetary boundary layer (PBL). Indeed, the ash cloud was then detected and characterized with a comprehensive set of in situ instruments at the Puy de Dome station (PdD). In agreement with the FLEXPART simulation, up to 65 μg m−3 of particle mass and 2.2 ppb of SO2 were measured at PdD, corresponding to concentrations higher than the 95 percentile of 2 yr of measurements at PdD. Moreover, the number concentration of particles increased to 24 000 cm−3, mainly in the submicronic mode, but a supermicronic mode was also detected with a modal diameter of 2 μm. The resulting optical properties of the ash aerosol were characterized by a low scattering Angstrom exponent (0.98), showing the presence of supermicronic particles. For the first time to our knowledge, the combination of in situ optical and physical characterization of the volcanic ash allowed the calculation of the mass-to-extinction ratio (η) with no assumptions on the aerosol density. The mass-to-extinction ratio was found to be significantly different from the background boundary layer aerosol (max: 1.57 g m−2 as opposed to 0.33 ± 0.03 g m−2). Using this ratio, ash mass concentration in the volcanic plume derived from LIDAR measurements was found to be 655 ± 23 μg m−3 when the plume was located in the FT (3000 m above the sea level – a.s.l.). This ratio could also be used to retrieve an aerosol mass concentration of 579 ± 60 μg m−3 on 19 April, when LIDAR observations detected the ash cloud at 3000 m a.s.l. in correspondence with model simulations (FLEXPART). On 22 April, another ash plume entered the BL, and although it was more diluted than during the May episode, the French research aircraft ATR42 that passed over Clermont-Ferrand in the PBL confirmed the presence of particles with a supermicronic mode, again with a modal diameter at 2 μm. This data set combining airborne, ground-based and remote sensing observations with dispersion model simulations shows an overall very good coherence during the volcanic eruption period, which allows a good confidence in the characteristics of the ash particles that can be derived from this unique data set.

[1]  Patrick Chazette,et al.  Assessment of vertically-resolved PM 10 from mobile lidar observations , 2009 .

[2]  Peter W. Webley,et al.  Volcanic ash plume identification using polarization lidar: Augustine eruption, Alaska , 2007 .

[3]  J. Ogren,et al.  Determining Aerosol Radiative Properties Using the TSI 3563 Integrating Nephelometer , 1998 .

[4]  A. Stohl,et al.  Volcanic aerosol optical properties and phase partitioning behavior after long-range advection characterized by UV-Lidar measurements , 2012 .

[5]  Freysteinn Sigmundsson,et al.  Intrusion triggering of the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull explosive eruption , 2010, Nature.

[6]  J. Streicher,et al.  Lidar: Range-Resolved Optical Remote Sensing of the Atmosphere , 2005 .

[7]  P. Laj,et al.  Design and Validation of a Volatility Hygroscopic Tandem Differential Mobility Analyzer (VH-TDMA) to Characterize the Relationships Between the Thermal and Hygroscopic Properties of Atmospheric Aerosol Particles , 2008 .

[8]  Josef Gasteiger,et al.  Volcanic ash from Iceland over Munich: mass concentration retrieved from ground-based remote sensing measurements , 2010 .

[9]  W. Patrick Arnott,et al.  Evaluation of Multiangle Absorption Photometry for Measuring Aerosol Light Absorption , 2005 .

[10]  M. Macchiato,et al.  Eyjafjallajökull volcanic ash in southern Italy , 2012 .

[11]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  Aerosol lidar intercomparison in the framework of the EARLINET project. 1. Instruments. , 2004, Applied optics.

[12]  Some considerations about ˚ Angstr¨ om exponent distributions , 2008 .

[13]  Patrick Chazette,et al.  Assessment of vertically-resolved PM10 from mobile lidar observations , 2009 .

[14]  J. Jimenez,et al.  Absorption Angstrom Exponent in AERONET and related data as an indicator of aerosol composition , 2009 .

[15]  M. Pujadas,et al.  Characterization of the Eyjafjallajökull volcanic plume over the Iberian Peninsula by lidar remote sensing and ground-level data collection , 2012 .

[16]  T. Casadevall,et al.  The 1989–1990 eruption of Redoubt Volcano, Alaska: impacts on aircraft operations , 1994 .

[17]  M. Hervo,et al.  Observations of nucleation of new particles in a volcanic plume , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  William E. Wilson,et al.  Measurement of total PM2.5 mass (nonvolatile plus semivolatile) with the Filter Dynamic Measurement System tapered element oscillating microbalance monitor , 2005 .

[19]  T. Takemura,et al.  Large Asian dust layers continuously reached North America in April 2010 , 2011 .

[20]  J. D. Wheeler,et al.  Aerosol backscatter fraction and single scattering albedo: Measured values and uncertainties at a coastal station in the Pacific Northwest , 1999 .

[21]  U. Schumann,et al.  Airborne observations of the Eyjafjalla volcano ash cloud over Europe during air space closure in April and May 2010 , 2010 .

[22]  Patrick Chazette,et al.  Retrieval of aerosol complex refractive index from a synergy between lidar, sunphotometer and in situ measurements during LISAIR experiment , 2007 .

[23]  Juan Cuesta,et al.  Synergetic technique combining elastic backscatter lidar data and sunphotometer AERONET inversion for retrieval by layer of aerosol optical and microphysical properties. , 2008, Applied optics.

[24]  Kerstin Stebel,et al.  Determination of time- and height-resolved volcanic ash emissions and their use for quantitative ash dispersion modeling: the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull eruption , 2011 .

[25]  Karine Sellegri,et al.  Seasonal variation of aerosol size distributions in the free troposphere and residual layer at the puy de Dôme station, France , 2009 .

[26]  M. Tolbert,et al.  Hygroscopic Growth of Ammonium Sulfate/Dicarboxylic Acids , 2003 .

[27]  T. Eck,et al.  Variability of Absorption and Optical Properties of Key Aerosol Types Observed in Worldwide Locations , 2002 .

[28]  P. Koepke,et al.  Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds: The Software Package OPAC , 1998 .

[29]  H. Patashnick,et al.  The tapered element oscillating microbalance as a tool for measuring ambient particulate concentrations in real time , 1992 .

[30]  Ana Maria Silva,et al.  Some considerations about Ångström exponent distributions , 2007 .

[31]  Christos Zerefos,et al.  Measurements of Saharan dust aerosols over the Eastern Mediterranean using elastic backscatter-Raman lidar, spectrophotometric and satellite observations in the frame of the EARLINET project , 2005 .

[32]  Martin Weilenmann,et al.  NO2/NO emissions of gasoline passenger cars and light-duty trucks with Euro-2 emission standard , 2003 .

[33]  W. Steinbrecht,et al.  The Eyjafjallajökull eruption in April 2010 – detection of volcanic plume using in-situ measurements, ozone sondes and lidar-ceilometer profiles , 2010 .

[34]  Beat Schmid,et al.  Comparison of methods for deriving aerosol asymmetry parameter , 2006 .

[35]  J. Reagan,et al.  Optical characterization of continental and biomass‐burning aerosols over Bozeman, Montana: A case study of the aerosol direct effect , 2011 .

[36]  A. Stohl,et al.  Technical note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2 , 2005 .

[37]  V. Freudenthaler,et al.  The 16 April 2010 major volcanic ash plume over central Europe: EARLINET lidar and AERONET photometer observations at Leipzig and Munich, Germany , 2010 .

[38]  Albert Ansmann,et al.  Ash and fine-mode particle mass profiles from EARLINET-AERONET observations over central Europe after the eruptions of the Eyjafjallajökull volcano in 2010 , 2011 .

[39]  Stefan Emeis,et al.  Measurement and simulation of the 16/17 April 2010 Eyjafjallajökull volcanic ash layer dispersion in the northern Alpine region , 2011 .

[40]  Christian Mätzler,et al.  MATLAB Functions for Mie Scattering and Absorption , 2002 .

[41]  S. Varghese,et al.  The Eyjafjallajökull ash plume – Part I: Physical, chemical and optical characteristics , 2012 .

[42]  I. Sokolik,et al.  Hygroscopic properties of volcanic ash , 2011 .

[43]  T. Bond,et al.  Limitations in the enhancement of visible light absorption due to mixing state , 2006 .

[44]  A. Ansmann,et al.  Aerosol lidar intercomparison in the framework of the EARLINET project. 2. Aerosol backscatter algorithms. , 2004, Applied optics.

[45]  J. Klett.  Lidar inversion with variable backscatter/extinction ratios. , 1985, Applied optics.

[46]  Alaska Volcano Observatory Staff.  The 1989”1990 eruption of Redoubt Volcano , 1990 .

[47]  L. Mona,et al.  Multi-wavelength Raman lidar observations of the Eyjafjallajökull volcanic cloud over Potenza, southern Italy , 2011 .

[48]  Harald Flentje,et al.  Influences of the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull volcanic plume on air quality in the northern Alpine region , 2011 .

[49]  A. J. Prata,et al.  Sulphur dioxide as a volcanic ash proxy during the April–May 2010 eruption of Eyjafjallajökull Volcano, Iceland , 2011 .

[50]  Philippe Labazuy,et al.  Near real-time monitoring of the April-May 2010 Eyjafjallajökull ash cloud: an example of a web-based, satellite data-driven, reporting system , 2012 .

[51]  Andrew Tupper,et al.  Aviation hazards from volcanoes: the state of the science , 2009 .

[52]  A. Peters,et al.  Particle size distribution factor as an indicator for the impact of the Eyjafjallajökull ash plume at ground level in Augsburg, Germany , 2011 .

[53]  C. Zerefos,et al.  Optical properties of different aerosol types: seven years of combined Raman-elastic backscatter lidar measurements in Thessaloniki, Greece , 2009 .

[54]  Michael D. King,et al.  A flexible inversion algorithm for retrieval of aerosol optical properties from Sun and sky radiance measurements , 2000 .