Patient-specific thresholds of intracranial pressure in severe traumatic brain injury.

OBJECT Based on continuous monitoring of the pressure reactivity index (PRx), the authors defined individualized intracranial pressure (ICP) thresholds by graphing the relationship between ICP and PRx. These investigators hypothesized that an "ICP dose" based on individually assessed ICP thresholds would correlate more closely with the 6-month outcome when compared with ICP doses derived by the recommended universal thresholds of 20 and 25 mm Hg. METHODS This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from 327 patients with severe traumatic brain injury. RESULTS Individualized thresholds were visually identified from graphs of PRx versus ICP; PRx > 0.2 was the cutoff. Intracranial pressure doses were then computed as the cumulative area under the curve above the defined thresholds in graphing ICP versus time. The term "Dose 20" (D20) was used to refer to an ICP threshold of 20 mm Hg; the markers D25 and DPRx were calculated similarly. Separate logistic regression models were fit with death as the outcome and each dose as the predictor, both alone and adjusted for covariates. The discriminative ability of each dose for mortality was assessed by receiver operating characteristic AUC analysis in which 5-fold cross-validation was used. A clearly identifiable PRx-based threshold was possible in 224 patients (68%). The DPRx (AUC 0.81, 95% CI 0.74-0.87) was found to have the highest area under the curve (AUC) over both D20 (0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.81) and D25 (0.77, 95% CI 0.70-0.83); in the cross-validation model, DPRx remained the best discriminator of mortality (DPRx: AUC 0.77 [95% CI 0.68-0.89]; D20: 0.72 [95% CI 0.66-0.81]; and D25: 0.65 [95% CI 0.56-0.73]). CONCLUSIONS The authors explored the importance of different ICP thresholds for outcome by calculating patient-specific ICP doses based on the continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity. They found that these individualized doses of intracranial hypertension were stronger predictors of death than doses derived from the universal thresholds of 20 and 25 mm Hg. The PRx could offer a method that can be directed toward individualizing the ICP threshold.

[1]  D. Menon,et al.  Critical Thresholds for Cerebrovascular Reactivity After Traumatic Brain Injury , 2012, Neurocritical Care.

[2]  Ian Piper,et al.  Pressure reactivity as a guide in the treatment of cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with brain trauma. , 2005, Journal of neurosurgery.

[3]  M. Rosner,et al.  Origin and evolution of plateau waves. Experimental observations and a theoretical model. , 1984, Journal of neurosurgery.

[4]  J. Pickard,et al.  Optimal cerebral perfusion pressure: are we ready for it? , 2013, Neurological research.

[5]  J D Pickard,et al.  Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure-reactivity in head injury. , 1998, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[6]  R. Chesnut Intracranial pressure monitoring in brain-injured patients is associated with worsening of survival. , 2008, The Journal of trauma.

[7]  G. Manley,et al.  Influence of data resolution and interpolation method on assessment of secondary brain insults in neurocritical care , 2005, Physiological measurement.

[8]  J. Pickard,et al.  Continuous determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in traumatic brain injury* , 2012, Critical care medicine.

[9]  David W Wright,et al.  Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. IX. Cerebral perfusion thresholds. , 2007, Journal of neurotrauma.

[10]  B. Jennett,et al.  ASSESSMENT OF OUTCOME AFTER SEVERE BRAIN DAMAGE A Practical Scale , 1975, The Lancet.

[11]  D. Marion,et al.  Outcome analysis of patients with severe head injuries and prolonged intracranial hypertension. , 1997, The Journal of trauma.

[12]  Odette A. Harris,et al.  Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury. XV. Steroids. , 2007, Journal of neurotrauma.

[13]  Noriaki Aoki,et al.  Determinants of mortality in patients with severe blunt head injury. , 2002, Archives of surgery.

[14]  J. Pickard,et al.  Impact of intracranial pressure and cerebral perfusion pressure on severe disability and mortality after head injury , 2006, Neurocritical care.

[15]  G. Manley,et al.  Relationship of "dose" of intracranial hypertension to outcome in severe traumatic brain injury. , 2008, Journal of neurosurgery.

[16]  T. Howells,et al.  Cerebral perfusion pressure between 50 and 60 mm Hg may be beneficial in head-injured patients: a computerized secondary insult monitoring study. , 2006, Neurosurgery.

[17]  Peter J. Kirkpatrick,et al.  Specialist neurocritical care and outcome from head injury , 2002, Intensive Care Medicine.

[18]  Sung C. Choi,et al.  Impact of ICP instability and hypotension on outcome in patients with severe head trauma , 1991 .

[19]  O B Paulson,et al.  Cerebral autoregulation. , 1990, Cerebrovascular and brain metabolism reviews.

[20]  J. Pickard,et al.  INDEX OF CEREBROSPINAL COMPENSATORY RESERVE IN HYDROCEPHALUS , 2009, Neurosurgery.

[21]  N. Carney,et al.  A trial of intracranial-pressure monitoring in traumatic brain injury. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  J. Pickard,et al.  Continuous monitoring of cerebrovascular pressure reactivity allows determination of optimal cerebral perfusion pressure in patients with traumatic brain injury , 2002, Critical care medicine.

[23]  H. Eisenberg,et al.  High-Dose Barbiturate Control of Elevated Intracranial Pressure in Patients with Severe Head Injury , 1989 .

[24]  Bizhan Aarabi,et al.  Automated measurement of "pressure times time dose" of intracranial hypertension best predicts outcome after severe traumatic brain injury. , 2010, The Journal of trauma.

[25]  J. Pickard,et al.  Cerebral extracellular chemistry and outcome following traumatic brain injury: a microdialysis study of 223 patients. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[26]  Beau B. Bruce,et al.  Update on the pathophysiology and management of idiopathic intracranial hypertension , 2012, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[27]  B Jennett,et al.  Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage. , 1975, Lancet.

[28]  G. Manley,et al.  A novel method of evaluating the impact of secondary brain insults on functional outcomes in traumatic brain-injured patients. , 2005 .

[29]  Geoffrey T. Manley,et al.  IX. Cerebral Perfusion Thresholds , 2007 .

[30]  J. Stockman Decompressive Craniectomy in Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury , 2012 .

[31]  J. Pickard,et al.  Continuous assessment of the cerebral vasomotor reactivity in head injury. , 1997, Neurosurgery.

[32]  A. Valadka Conventional neurocritical care and cerebral oxygenation after traumatic brain injury , 2008 .

[33]  J D Pickard,et al.  ICM+, a flexible platform for investigations of cerebrospinal dynamics in clinical practice. , 2008, Acta neurochirurgica. Supplement.

[34]  Geoffrey T. Manley,et al.  VIII. Intracranial Pressure Thresholds , 2007 .