Testing a dual-modality system that combines full-field digital mammography and automated breast ultrasound.

PURPOSE The aim of this study was to test a novel dual-modality imaging system that combines full-field digital mammography (FFDM) and automated breast ultrasound (ABUS) in a single platform. Our Aceso system, named after the Greek goddess of healing, was specifically designed for the early detection of cancer in women with dense breast tissue. MATERIALS AND METHODS Aceso was first tested using two industry standards: a Contrast Detail Mammography (CDMAM) phantom as endorsed by European Reference Organisation for Quality Assured Breast Screening and Diagnostic Services was used to assess the FFDM images; and the CIRS 040GSE ultrasound phantom was imaged to evaluate the quality of the ABUS images. In addition, 58 women participated in a clinical trial: 51 were healthy volunteers aged between 40 and 65, while 7 were patients referred by the breast clinic, 6 of whom had biopsy-proven breast cancer. RESULTS The CDMAM tests showed that the FFDM results were "acceptable" but fell short of "achievable" which was attributed to the low dose used. The ABUS images had good depth penetration (80 mm) and adequate axial resolution (0.5 mm), but the lateral resolution of 2 mm was judged to be too coarse. In a 42-year-old volunteer with extremely dense breast tissue, the ABUS modality detected a lesion (a benign cyst) that was mammographically occult in the FFDM image. For a 73-year-old patient with fatty breasts, a malignant lesion was successfully detected and co-registered in the FFDM and ABUS images. On average, each woman spent less than 11 min in the acquisition room. CONCLUSIONS While there is room for improvement in the quality of both the FFDM and ABUS images, Aceso has demonstrated its ability to acquire clinically meaningful images for a range of women with varying breast densities and, therefore, has potential as a screening device.

[1]  Hilde Bosmans,et al.  Evaluation of software for reading images of the CDMAM test object to assess digital mammography systems , 2008, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[2]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Breast Mass Characterization Using 3‐Dimensional Automated Ultrasound as an Adjunct to Digital Breast Tomosynthesis , 2013, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[3]  P. Dempsey,et al.  The History of Breast Ultrasound , 2004, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[4]  B. Munier,et al.  Full field digital mammography scanner. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[5]  Suzanne L. Holcombe United States Patent and Trademark Office , 2008 .

[6]  Jasjit S Suri,et al.  Fischer's Fused Full Field Digital Mammography and Ultrasound System (FFDMUS). , 2005, Studies in health technology and informatics.

[7]  Wei Yang,et al.  Diagnostic breast ultrasound: current status and future directions. , 2007, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[8]  D. Kopans Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial: Miller AB, Wall C, Baines CJ, et al (Univ of Toronto, Ontario, Canada; et al) BMJ 348:g366, 2014§ , 2014 .

[9]  Jean B. Cormack,et al.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. , 2008, JAMA.

[10]  T. To,et al.  Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[11]  J. Boone,et al.  Dedicated breast CT: radiation dose and image quality evaluation. , 2001, Radiology.

[12]  T S Douglas,et al.  Modeling, validation and application of a mathematical tissue-equivalent breast phantom for linear slot-scanning digital mammography , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  W. Jonat,et al.  Influence of additional breast ultrasound on cancer detection in a cohort study for quality assurance in breast diagnosis—analysis of 102,577 diagnostic procedures , 2010, European Radiology.

[14]  Christopher L. Vaughan,et al.  Feasibility of using LODOX technology for mammography , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[15]  James A Zagzebski,et al.  Simulation study of effects of speed of sound and attenuation on ultrasound lateral resolution. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[16]  A. Bleyer,et al.  Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. , 2012, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  J.F. Krucker,et al.  Evaluation of thin compression paddles for mammographically compatible ultrasound , 2004, IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium, 2004.

[18]  C. Vaughan,et al.  Diagnosing breast cancer: an opportunity for innovative engineering. , 2012, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[19]  E. Arleo,et al.  Recall rate of screening ultrasound with automated breast volumetric scanning (ABVS) in women with dense breasts: a first quarter experience. , 2014, Clinical imaging.

[20]  A. Kapur,et al.  Combination of Digital Mammography with Semi-automated 3D Breast Ultrasound , 2004, Technology in cancer research & treatment.

[21]  Michael Rumsey,et al.  Fusion of digital mammography with breast ultrasound: a phantom study , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[22]  K. Kelly,et al.  Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts , 2009, European Radiology.

[23]  D. Dance,et al.  Further factors for the estimation of mean glandular dose using the United Kingdom, European and IAEA breast dosimetry protocols , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  T S Douglas,et al.  Radiation dose from a linear slit scanning X-ray machine with full-body imaging capabilities. , 2008, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[25]  L. Vatten,et al.  Modern mammography screening and breast cancer mortality: population study , 2014, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[26]  Ruola Ning,et al.  Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[27]  Markus Hahn,et al.  Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue. A systematic review , 2009, BMC Cancer.

[28]  Ralf-Dieter Hilgers,et al.  Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[29]  Jiayu Chen,et al.  Automated Full-field Breast Ultrasonography: The Past and The Present , 2007 .

[30]  M. Helvie,et al.  Multi-modality 3D breast imaging with X-Ray tomosynthesis and automated ultrasound , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[31]  Lubomir M. Hadjiiski,et al.  Automated Registration of Volumes of Interest for a Combined X-Ray Tomosynthesis and Ultrasound Breast Imaging System , 2008, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[32]  V. Giuliano,et al.  Improved breast cancer detection in asymptomatic women using 3D-automated breast ultrasound in mammographically dense breasts. , 2013, Clinical imaging.