Consumer sensory neuroscience in the context of food marketing

The development of neuroimaging techniques such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has provided marketers with the possibility of studying changes in brain activity in relation to marketing information (packaging, pricing, promotions, etc.) and decision-making. When consumers interact with a product, the brain captures and stores the related sensory experience in a multisensory representation in memory. Such memories serve consumers when making their future decisions. Thus, the senses play an important role in consumer behavior and the results of fMRI studies provide an interesting way for sensory marketers to analyze how the brain processes sensory information affecting product perception. In this article, we show how multisensory information, as well as mental simulation, impact taste expectations and subsequently taste, or better-said, flavor, perception in the light of neuroimaging studies. First, we discuss how neural analysis can help to understand the effect of marketing information on taste perception. Second, we highlight the role of gustatory inference on food perception in light of the latest fMRI findings. Third, we suggest some directions to improve the understanding of crossmodal correspondences in the context of consumer sensory experiences.

[1]  Wolfgang Skrandies,et al.  Match and Mismatch of Taste, Odor, and Color is Reflected by Electrical Activity in the Human Brain , 2008 .

[2]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  Color of scents: chromatic stimuli modulate odor responses in the human brain. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  W. K. Simmons,et al.  Pictures of appetizing foods activate gustatory cortices for taste and reward. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[4]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  Eating with our eyes: From visual hunger to digital satiation , 2016, Brain and Cognition.

[5]  A. Krishna,et al.  An Integrative Review of Sensory Marketing: Engaging the Senses to Affect Perception, Judgment and Behavior , 2011 .

[6]  Thomas Johannes Lucas van Rompay,et al.  Tough package, strong taste: The influence of packaging design on taste impressions and product evaluations , 2011 .

[7]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Sensory Marketing, Embodiment, and Grounded Cognition: Implications for Consumer Behavior , 2013 .

[8]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  Consumer Neuroscience: Applications, Challenges, and Possible Solutions , 2015 .

[9]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  The first taste is always with the eyes: A meta-analysis on the neural correlates of processing visual food cues , 2011, NeuroImage.

[10]  Samuel M. McClure,et al.  Neural Correlates of Behavioral Preference for Culturally Familiar Drinks , 2004, Neuron.

[11]  Adrian David Cheok,et al.  Crossmodal correspondences between taste and shape, and their implications for product packaging: A review , 2016 .

[12]  C. Spence Managing sensory expectations concerning products and brands: Capitalizing on the potential of sound and shape symbolism , 2012 .

[13]  M. O'Mahony,et al.  Gustatory Responses to Nongustatory Stimuli , 1983, Perception.

[14]  Charles Spence,et al.  Using combined eye tracking and word association in order to assess novel packaging solutions: A case study involving jam jars , 2013 .

[15]  Ophelia Deroy,et al.  How automatic are crossmodal correspondences? , 2013, Consciousness and Cognition.

[16]  Charles Spence,et al.  The cognitive neuroscience of crossmodal correspondences , 2012, i-Perception.

[17]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Sensory marketing, embodiment, and grounded cognition: A review and introduction , 2014 .

[18]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Marketing actions can modulate neural representations of experienced pleasantness , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[19]  Nicolas S. Linder,et al.  Organic labeling influences food valuation and choice , 2010, NeuroImage.

[20]  Israel Liberzon,et al.  Decision neuroscience and consumer decision making , 2012 .

[21]  Joost X. Maier,et al.  Natural, Metaphoric, and Linguistic Auditory Direction Signals Have Distinct Influences on Visual Motion Processing , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[22]  L. Barsalou Grounded cognition. , 2008, Annual review of psychology.

[23]  Cesare V Parise,et al.  Crossmodal Correspondences: Standing Issues and Experimental Guidelines. , 2016, Multisensory research.

[24]  Charles Spence,et al.  A Sweet Sound? Food Names Reveal Implicit Associations between Taste and Pitch , 2010, Perception.

[25]  Rainer Goebel,et al.  The sound of size Crossmodal binding in pitch-size synesthesia: A combined TMS, EEG and psychophysics study , 2012, NeuroImage.

[26]  Olivier Oullier,et al.  Why People Drink Shampoo? Food Imitating Products Are Fooling Brains and Endangering Consumers for Marketing Purposes , 2014, PloS one.