Vergence and accommodation to multiple-image-plane stereoscopic displays: 'Real world' responses with practical image-plane separations?

Conventional stereoscopic displays present images on a single focal plane. The resulting mismatch between the stimuli to the eyes' focusing response (accommodation) and to convergence causes fatigue and poor stereo performance. One promising solution is to distribute image intensity across a number of relatively widely spaced image planes - a technique referred to as depth filtering. Previously, we found this elicits accurate, continuous monocular accommodation responses with image-plane separations as large as 1.1 Diopters, suggesting that a relatively small (i.e. practical) number of image planes is sufficient to eliminate vergence-accommodation conflicts over a large range of simulated distances. However, accommodation responses have been found to overshoot systematically when the same stimuli are viewed binocularly. Here, we examined the minimum image-plane spacing required for accurate accommodation to binocular depth-filtered images. We compared accommodation and vergence responses to step changes in depth for depth-filtered stimuli, using image-plane separations of 0.6-1.2 D, and equivalent real stimuli. Accommodation responses to real and depth-filtered stimuli were equivalent for image-plane separations of ~0.6-0.9 D, but inaccurate thereafter. We conclude that depth filtering can be used to precisely match accommodation and vergence demand in a practical stereoscopic display, using a relatively small number of image planes.

[1]  K N OGLE,et al.  Observations on accommodative convergence; especially its nonlinear relationships. , 1959, American journal of ophthalmology.

[2]  Masaki Emoto,et al.  Two factors in visual fatigue caused by stereoscopic HDTV images , 2004 .

[3]  Martin S. Banks,et al.  Achieving near-correct focus cues in a 3D display using multiple image planes , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[4]  E F FINCHAM,et al.  The reciprocal actions of accommodation and convergence , 1957, The Journal of physiology.

[5]  Kevin J. MacKenzie,et al.  Accommodation to multiple-focal-plane displays: Implications for improving stereoscopic displays and for accommodation control. , 2010, Journal of vision.

[6]  J. C. Kotulak,et al.  A computational model of the error detector of human visual accommodation , 1986, Biological Cybernetics.

[7]  Ian P. Howard,et al.  Seeing in Depth , 2008 .

[8]  Campbell Fw A method for measuring the depth of field of the human eye. , 1954 .

[9]  D. A. Owens A comparison of accommodative responsiveness and contrast sensitivity for sinusoidal gratings , 1980, Vision Research.

[10]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[11]  Masahito Torii,et al.  Dynamic measurement of accommodative responses while viewing stereoscopic images , 2008 .

[12]  Sheng Liu,et al.  A systematic method for designing depth-fused multi-focal plane three-dimensional displays. , 2010, Optics express.

[13]  Kenneth N. Ogle,et al.  An Analytical Treatment of the Longitudinal Horopter; Its Measurement and Application to Related Phenomena, Especially to the Relative Size and Shape of the Ocular Images* , 1932 .

[14]  W N Charman,et al.  Near vision, lags of accommodation and myopia , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[15]  I C Wood,et al.  STEREOPSIS WITH SPATIALLY‐DEGRADED IMAGES * , 1983, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[16]  Meredith W. Morgan,et al.  THE CLINICAL ASPECTS OF ACCOMMODATION AND CONVERGENCE , 1944 .

[17]  A S Percival,et al.  The Prescribing of Spectacles , 1911, Nature.

[18]  G. Heath,et al.  Components of accommodation. , 1956, American journal of optometry and archives of American Academy of Optometry.

[19]  David M. Hoffman,et al.  Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. , 2008, Journal of vision.

[20]  D. Fender,et al.  CONTROL MECHANISMS OF THE EYE. , 1964, Scientific American.

[21]  C. Schor,et al.  Binocular sensory fusion is limited by spatial resolution , 1984, Vision Research.

[22]  S. McKee,et al.  Stereoscopic acuity with defocused and spatially filtered retinal images , 1980 .

[23]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[24]  James Gao,et al.  High-speed switchable lens enables the development of a volumetric stereoscopic display. , 2009, Optics express.

[25]  J S Wolffsohn,et al.  Simultaneous continuous recording of accommodation and pupil size using the modified Shin‐Nippon SRW‐5000 autorefractor , 2004, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[26]  Pat Hanrahan,et al.  Achieving Near-Correct Focus Cues Using Multiple Image Planes , 2004 .

[27]  W. N. Charman,et al.  Pupil Diameter and the Depth-of-field of the Human Eye as Measured by Laser Speckle , 1977 .

[28]  M. Mon-Williams,et al.  Health issues with virtual reality displays: what we do know and what we don't , 1997, COMG.

[29]  Kevin J. MacKenzie,et al.  Eliminating accommodation-convergence conflicts in stereoscopic displays: Can multiple-focal-plane displays elicit continuous and consistent vergence and accommodation responses? , 2010, Electronic Imaging.

[30]  Peter A. Howarth,et al.  Visual fatigue caused by viewing stereoscopic motion images: Background, theories, and observations , 2008, Displays.

[31]  F. Okano,et al.  Repeated vergence adaptation causes the decline of visual functions in watching stereoscopic television , 2005, Journal of Display Technology.

[32]  Fergal Shevlin A fixed-viewpoint volumetric stereoscopic 3D display using adaptive optics , 2005, IS&T/SPIE Electronic Imaging.

[33]  Sheng Liu,et al.  An optical see-through head mounted display with addressable focal planes , 2008, 2008 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[34]  M. Alpern,et al.  Variability of accommodation during steady fixation at various levels of illuminance. , 1958, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[35]  J. Vernon Odom,et al.  Symmetrical refractive error elevates stereo thresholds , 1992, 1992 14th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[36]  J S Wolffsohn,et al.  Clinical evaluation of the Shin-Nippon SRW-5000 autorefractor in adults. , 2001, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[37]  Martin S. Banks,et al.  A stereo display prototype with multiple focal distances , 2004, SIGGRAPH 2004.

[38]  James S. Wolffsohn,et al.  Continuous recording of accommodation and pupil size using the Shin‐Nippon SRW‐5000 autorefractor , 2001 .

[39]  Thomas Riedl,et al.  Transparent OLED Displays , 2010 .

[40]  Myron W. Krueger,et al.  Dynamic focusing in head-mounted displays , 1999, Electronic Imaging.