SPHARM-Based Spatial fMRI Characterization With Intersubject Anatomical Variability Reduction

It has been recently shown that spatial patterns of activation within regions of interest (ROIs) in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data can be used as sensitive markers of brain activation differences. In this paper, we propose novel invariant features for characterizing such spatial activation patterns based on spherical harmonic (SPHARM) data representations. The proposed three dimensional (3-D) spatial features are novel in that; first, they provide a unique representation of any ROI's functional data; second, they simultaneously account for inherent inter-subject anatomical variability that may influence any spatial characterization; third, they are invariant to similarity transformations and hence allow for direct comparisons between ROIs without any requirement for normalization to an atlas. We present quantitative validation demonstrating our method's improved sensitivity in performing group analysis when compared to traditional spatial normalization using synthetic data at the ROI level. We also use the proposed technique along with traditional normalization approach on real fMRI data collected from PD patients and normal subjects. The proposed features provide a powerful means to sensitively detect group-wise changes in ROI-based fMRI activation patterns even in the presence of anatomical variability.

[1]  Szymon Rusinkiewicz,et al.  Rotation Invariant Spherical Harmonic Representation of 3D Shape Descriptors , 2003, Symposium on Geometry Processing.

[2]  Jean-Francois Mangin,et al.  Structural Analysis of fMRI Data Revisited: Improving the Sensitivity and Reliability of fMRI Group Studies , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Bala V. Manyam Principles of Neurology, 4th Ed. (Companion Handbook) , 1992, Neurology.

[4]  R. Turner,et al.  Characterization and Correction of Interpolation Effects in the Realignment of fMRI Time Series , 2000, NeuroImage.

[5]  Dejan V. VraniC An improvement of rotation invariant 3D-shape based on functions on concentric spheres , 2003, Proceedings 2003 International Conference on Image Processing (Cat. No.03CH37429).

[6]  Volker Schönefeld Spherical Harmonics , 2019, An Introduction to Radio Astronomy.

[7]  J. F. Stein,et al.  Role of the cerebellum in the visual guidance of movement , 1986, Nature.

[8]  Bertrand Thirion,et al.  Robust statistics for nonparametric group analysis in fMRI , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[9]  Martin J. McKeown,et al.  Shape vs. volume: invariant shape descriptors for 3D region of interest characterization in MRI , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[10]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  Atlas-based hippocampus segmentation in Alzheimer's disease and mild cognitive impairment , 2005, NeuroImage.

[11]  C. Stark,et al.  Making Memories without Trying: Medial Temporal Lobe Activity Associated with Incidental Memory Formation during Recognition , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[12]  Can Ceritoglu,et al.  Increasing the power of functional maps of the medial temporal lobe by using large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  A. Traboulsee,et al.  Invariant SPHARM Shape Descriptors for Complex Geometry in MR Region of Interest Analysis , 2007, 2007 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[14]  J. Lancaster,et al.  Using the talairach atlas with the MNI template , 2001, NeuroImage.

[15]  Martin J. McKeown,et al.  Characterizing Task-Related Temporal Dynamics of Spatial Activation Distributions in fMRI BOLD Signals , 2007, MICCAI.

[16]  Gilles Burel,et al.  Three-dimensional invariants and their application to object recognition , 1995, Signal Process..

[17]  Thomas E. Nichols,et al.  Validating cluster size inference: random field and permutation methods , 2003, NeuroImage.

[18]  Sean S. B. Moore,et al.  FFTs for the 2-Sphere-Improvements and Variations , 1996 .

[19]  A. Lang,et al.  Parkinson's disease. First of two parts. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  Paul A. Yushkevich,et al.  Hippocampus-specific fMRI group activation analysis using the continuous medial representation , 2007, NeuroImage.

[21]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[22]  Satrajit S. Ghosh,et al.  Region of interest based analysis of functional imaging data , 2003, NeuroImage.

[23]  J. Stein,et al.  Role of the cerebellum in the visual guidance of movement. , 1992, Nature.

[24]  Peter Ford Dominey,et al.  Overactivation of primary motor cortex is asymmetrical in hemiparkinsonian patients , 2000, Neuroreport.

[25]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[26]  L. K. Hansen,et al.  Independent component analysis of functional MRI: what is signal and what is noise? , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[27]  N. Vilenkin Special Functions and the Theory of Group Representations , 1968 .

[28]  I. Johnsrude,et al.  The problem of functional localization in the human brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[29]  Scott T Grafton,et al.  The functional anatomy of parkinsonian bradykinesia , 2003, NeuroImage.

[30]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Evidence for a two-stage model of spatial working memory processing within the lateral frontal cortex: a positron emission tomography study. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[31]  L S Illis,et al.  Neurotrauma , 1998, Spinal Cord.

[32]  Rupert Lanzenberger,et al.  Influence of fMRI smoothing procedures on replicability of fine scale motor localization , 2005, NeuroImage.

[33]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Nonlinear spatial normalization using basis functions , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[34]  A. Lang,et al.  Parkinson's disease. Second of two parts. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  Aleix M. Martínez,et al.  Recognition of expression variant faces using weighted subspaces , 2004, Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004. ICPR 2004..

[36]  R T Constable,et al.  Quantifying and comparing region-of-interest activation patterns in functional brain MR imaging: methodology considerations. , 1998, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[37]  Martin J. McKeown,et al.  Characterizing fMRI Activations within Regions of Interest (ROIs) Using 3D Moment Invariants , 2006, 2006 Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop (CVPRW'06).

[38]  Rolf-Detlef Treede,et al.  Spatial resolution of fMRI in the human parasylvian cortex: Comparison of somatosensory and auditory activation , 2005, NeuroImage.

[39]  Martin Styner,et al.  Caudate Shape Discrimination in Schizophrenia Using Template-Free Non-parametric Tests , 2003, MICCAI.

[40]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[41]  Rui Liao,et al.  Isolation and minimization of head motion‐induced signal variations in fMRI data using independent component analysis , 2006, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[42]  D. Tank,et al.  Brain magnetic resonance imaging with contrast dependent on blood oxygenation. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  Vasileios Megalooikonomou,et al.  Fast and effective characterization for classification and similarity searches of 2D and 3D spatial region data , 2005, Pattern Recognit..

[44]  F. Chollet,et al.  Cortical motor reorganization in akinetic patients with Parkinson's disease: a functional MRI study. , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[45]  Rafeef Abugharbieh,et al.  Shape (but not volume) changes in the thalami in Parkinson disease , 2008, BMC neurology.

[46]  P. Roland,et al.  Comparison of spatial normalization procedures and their impact on functional maps , 2002, Human brain mapping.