Predicting Stroop Effect from Spontaneous Neuronal Activity: A Study of Regional Homogeneity

The Stroop effect is one of the most robust and well-studied phenomena in cognitive psychology and cognitive neuroscience. However, little is known about the relationship between intrinsic brain activity and the individual differences of this effect. In the present study, we explored this issue by examining whether resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) signals could predict individual differences in the Stroop effect of healthy individuals. A partial correlation analysis was calculated to examine the relationship between regional homogeneity (ReHo) and Stroop effect size, while controlling for age, sex, and framewise displacement (FD). The results showed positive correlations in the left inferior frontal gyrus (LIFG), the left insula, the ventral anterior cingulate cortex (vACC), and the medial frontal gyrus (MFG), and negative correlation in the left precentral gyrus (LPG). These results indicate the possible influences of the LIFG, the left insula, and the LPG on the efficiency of cognitive control, and demonstrate that the key nodes of default mode network (DMN) may be important in goal-directed behavior and/or mental effort during cognitive control tasks.

[1]  RP Dum,et al.  Topographic organization of corticospinal projections from the frontal lobe: motor areas on the lateral surface of the hemisphere , 1993, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[2]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  J. Requin,et al.  The Effects of Irrelevant Stimuli: 1. The Time Course of Stimulus-Stimulus and Stimulus-Response Consistency Effects With Stroop-Like Stimuli, Simon-Like Tasks, and Their Factorial Combinations , 1999 .

[4]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[5]  M. Raichle.  Two views of brain function , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[6]  Q. Gong,et al.  Altered regional homogeneity in post-traumatic stress disorder: a restingstate functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2012, Neuroscience Bulletin.

[7]  D. Yurgelun-Todd,et al.  Age-related changes in insula cortical thickness and impulsivity: Significance for emotional development and decision-making , 2013, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Milham,et al.  Competition for priority in processing increases prefrontal cortex's involvement in top-down control: an event-related fMRI study of the stroop task. , 2003, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[9]  Carrick C. Williams,et al.  Stroop Interference, Practice, and Aging , 2003, Neuropsychology, development, and cognition. Section B, Aging, neuropsychology and cognition.

[10]  Zhening Liu,et al.  [Diffusion tensor imaging and resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging on young patients with major depressive disorder]. , 2010, Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences.

[11]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  An event-related functional MRI study of the stroop color word interference task. , 2000, Cerebral cortex.

[12]  Gregory G. Brown,et al.  Brain activation and pupil response during covert performance of the Stroop Color Word task , 1999, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[13]  Yufeng Zang,et al.  Abnormal neural activity in children with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: a resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging study , 2006, Neuroreport.

[14]  P. Falkai,et al.  Functional brain abnormalities in psychiatric disorders: Neural mechanisms to detect and resolve cognitive conflict and interference , 2008, Brain Research Reviews.

[15]  Yingli Lu,et al.  Regional homogeneity approach to fMRI data analysis , 2004, NeuroImage.

[16]  Ting Wang,et al.  Linking inter-individual differences in the conflict adaptation effect to spontaneous brain activity , 2014, NeuroImage.

[17]  Yasuyuki Taki,et al.  Regional gray and white matter volume associated with Stroop interference: Evidence from voxel-based morphometry , 2012, NeuroImage.

[18]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Function and Structure of the Right Inferior Frontal Cortex Predict Individual Differences in Response Inhibition: A Model-Based Approach , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  V. Bowden,et al.  The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences , 1992 .

[20]  Yufeng Zang,et al.  Toward reliable characterization of functional homogeneity in the human brain: Preprocessing, scan duration, imaging resolution and computational space , 2013, NeuroImage.

[21]  Douglas C Noll,et al.  Cortical Plasticity During Three-Week Motor Skill Learning , 2004, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[22]  Huafu Chen,et al.  Regional homogeneity changes in social anxiety disorder: A resting-state fMRI study , 2011, Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging.

[23]  Colin M. Macleod,et al.  Interdimensional interference in the Stroop effect: uncovering the cognitive and neural anatomy of attention , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[24]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  George Bush,et al.  The emotional counting stroop paradigm: a functional magnetic resonance imaging probe of the anterior cingulate affective division , 1998, Biological Psychiatry.

[26]  Yufeng Zang,et al.  Regional homogeneity of resting state fMRI signals predicts Stop signal task performance , 2012, NeuroImage.

[27]  B. Mazoyer,et al.  Cortical networks for working memory and executive functions sustain the conscious resting state in man , 2001, Brain Research Bulletin.

[28]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Statistical parametric maps in functional imaging: A general linear approach , 1994 .

[29]  C. Kennard,et al.  Functional role of the supplementary and pre-supplementary motor areas , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[30]  Colin M. Macleod.  Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: an integrative review. , 1991, Psychological bulletin.

[31]  RP Dum,et al.  The origin of corticospinal projections from the premotor areas in the frontal lobe , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[32]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  Verb generation in patients with focal frontal lesions: a neuropsychological test of neuroimaging findings. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  Tobias Egner,et al.  Right Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex Mediates Individual Differences in Conflict-driven Cognitive Control , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[34]  Chi-Shing Tse,et al.  Predicting conversion to dementia of the Alzheimer's type in a healthy control sample: the power of errors in Stroop color naming. , 2010, Psychology and aging.

[35]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Investigations of the functional anatomy of attention using the stroop test , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  D. Stuss,et al.  Stroop performance in focal lesion patients: dissociation of processes and frontal lobe lesion location , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[37]  Xiang Wang,et al.  Evidence of a Dissociation Pattern in Resting-State Default Mode Network Connectivity in First-Episode, Treatment-Naive Major Depression Patients , 2012, Biological Psychiatry.

[38]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Common Blood Flow Changes across Visual Tasks: II. Decreases in Cerebral Cortex , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[39]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  G. Glover,et al.  Dissociable Intrinsic Connectivity Networks for Salience Processing and Executive Control , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  P. Strick,et al.  Frontal lobe inputs to primate motor cortex: evidence for four somatotopically organized ‘premotor’ areas , 1979, Brain Research.

[42]  A. Turken,et al.  Left inferior frontal gyrus is critical for response inhibition , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[43]  M. Fox,et al.  Spontaneous fluctuations in brain activity observed with functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[44]  M. Botvinick,et al.  The Contribution of the Anterior Cingulate Cortex to Executive Processes in Cognition , 1999, Reviews in the neurosciences.

[45]  Xi-Nian Zuo,et al.  Toward neurobiological characterization of functional homogeneity in the human cortex: regional variation, morphological association and functional covariance network organization , 2014, Brain Structure and Function.

[46]  B. J. Casey,et al.  Regional brain activity when selecting a response despite interference: An H2 15O PET study of the stroop and an emotional stroop , 1994, Human brain mapping.

[47]  S. Kornblum,et al.  Isolation of Specific Interference Processing in the Stroop Task: PET Activation Studies , 1997, NeuroImage.

[48]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring versus selection-for-action in anterior cingulate cortex , 1999, Nature.

[49]  A. Henik,et al.  Evidence for interaction between the stop signal and the Stroop task conflict. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[50]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[51]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[52]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Brain's Default Network , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[53]  L. Sokoloff,et al.  The effect of mental arithmetic on cerebral circulation and metabolism. , 1955, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[54]  M. Steinhauser,et al.  Distinguishing response conflict and task conflict in the Stroop task: evidence from ex-Gaussian distribution analysis. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[55]  J. Duncan,et al.  Prefrontal cortical function and anxiety: controlling attention to threat-related stimuli , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[56]  M. Raichle,et al.  The anterior cingulate cortex mediates processing selection in the Stroop attentional conflict paradigm. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  Bharat B. Biswal,et al.  Resting state fMRI: A personal history , 2012, NeuroImage.

[58]  Antonino Vallesi,et al.  Task Context and Frontal Lobe Activation in the Stroop Task , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[59]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Changes in connectivity profiles define functionally distinct regions in human medial frontal cortex. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[60]  T A Ketter,et al.  Blunted left cingulate activation in mood disorder subjects during a response interference task (the Stroop). , 1997, The Journal of neuropsychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[61]  Timothy E. J. Behrens,et al.  Functional organization of the medial frontal cortex , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[62]  Tianzi Jiang,et al.  Regional homogeneity of the resting-state brain activity correlates with individual intelligence , 2011, Neuroscience Letters.

[63]  Birte U. Forstmann,et al.  Neural Mechanisms, Temporal Dynamics, and Individual Differences in Interference Control , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[64]  J. Ridley.  Studies of Interference in Serial Verbal Reactions , 2001 .

[65]  M. Farah,et al.  Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[66]  Dongrong Xu,et al.  Association of Cerebral Networks in Resting State with Sexual Preference of Homosexual Men: A Study of Regional Homogeneity and Functional Connectivity , 2013, PloS one.

[67]  Thomas A Hammeke,et al.  Neural basis of the Stroop interference task: Response competition or selective attention? , 2002, Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society.

[68]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[69]  Irene P. Kan,et al.  Effects of Repetition and Competition on Activity in Left Prefrontal Cortex during Word Generation , 1999, Neuron.

[70]  Stephen M Smith,et al.  Correspondence of the brain's functional architecture during activation and rest , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[71]  Yufeng Zang,et al.  DPARSF: A MATLAB Toolbox for “Pipeline” Data Analysis of Resting-State fMRI , 2010 .

[72]  M. Posner,et al.  Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[73]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Dissociations among tasks involving inhibition: A single-case study , 2005, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[74]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance. , 1998, Science.

[75]  Timothy O. Laumann,et al.  Functional Network Organization of the Human Brain , 2011, Neuron.

[76]  S. Bressler,et al.  Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[77]  D. Balota,et al.  Relationship between Stroop performance and resting state functional connectivity in cognitively normal older adults. , 2013, Neuropsychology.

[78]  Hong Li,et al.  The neural mechanisms of semantic and response conflicts: An fMRI study of practice-related effects in the Stroop task , 2013, NeuroImage.

[79]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Cortical and Subcortical Contributions to Stop Signal Response Inhibition: Role of the Subthalamic Nucleus , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[80]  Kathryn M. McMillan,et al.  A comparison of label‐based review and ALE meta‐analysis in the Stroop task , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[81]  Chaogan Yan,et al.  DPARSF: A MATLAB Toolbox for “Pipeline” Data Analysis of Resting-State fMRI , 2010, Front. Syst. Neurosci..