On the nature of GRB 050509b: a disguised short GRB

(shortened) Context: GRB GRB 050509b, detected by the \emph{Swift} satellite, is the first case where an X-ray afterglow has been observed associated with a short gamma-ray burst (GRB). Within the fireshell model, the canonical GRB light curve presents two different components: the proper-GRB (P-GRB) and the extended afterglow. [...] In particular, the traditionally called short GRBs can be either "genuine" short GRBs [...] or "disguised" short GRBs [...]. AIMS: We verify whether GRB 050509b can be classified as a "genuine" short or a "disguised" short GRB, in the fireshell model. Methods: We investigate two alternative scenarios. In the first, we start from the assumption that this GRB is a "genuine" short burst. In the second attempt, we assume that this GRB is a "disguised" burst. Results: If GRB 050509b were a genuine short GRB, there should initially be very hard emission which is ruled out by the observations. The analysis that assumes that this is a disguised short GRB is compatible with the observations. The theoretical model predicts a value of the extended afterglow energy peak that is consistent with the Amati relation. Conclusions: GRB 050509b cannot be classified as a "genuine" short GRB. The observational data are consistent with a "disguised" short GRB classification, i.e., a long burst with a weak extended afterglow "deflated" by the low density of the CBM. We expect that all short GRBs with measured redshifts are disguised short GRBs because of a selection effect: if there is enough energy in the afterglow to measure the redshift, then the proper GRB must be less energetic than the afterglow. The Amati relation is found to be fulfilled only by the extended afterglow excluding the P-GRB.

[1]  N. Gehrels,et al.  Gamma-Ray Bursts , 2016, Stars and Stellar Processes.

[2]  E. Berger,et al.  The Environments of Short-Duration Gamma-Ray Bursts and Implications for their Progenitors , 2010, 1005.1068.

[3]  B. Patricelli,et al.  GRB 071227: an additional case of a disguised short burst , 2010, 1006.4842.

[4]  W. Hillebrandt,et al.  Sub-luminous type Ia supernovae from the mergers of equal-mass white dwarfs with mass ∼0.9M⊙ , 2009, Nature.

[5]  E. Berger,et al.  HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS OF SHORT GAMMA-RAY BURST HOST GALAXIES: MORPHOLOGIES, OFFSETS, AND LOCAL ENVIRONMENTS , 2009, 0909.1804.

[6]  C. Guidorzi,et al.  Extremely energetic Fermi Gamma-Ray Bursts obey spectral energy correlations , 2009, 0907.0384.

[7]  C. Bianco,et al.  GRB060614: a "fake" short GRB from a merging binary system , 2008, 0810.4855.

[8]  C. Bianco,et al.  The Amati relation in the fireshell model , 2008, 0806.3705.

[9]  C. Bianco,et al.  Theoretical Interpretation of Luminosity and Spectral Properties of GRB 031203 , 2005, 0804.2821.

[10]  Giancarlo Cusumano,et al.  Different progenitors of short hard gamma-ray bursts , 2007, 0711.3034.

[11]  S. Smartt,et al.  A very faint core-collapse supernova in M85 , 2007, Nature.

[12]  C. Bianco,et al.  GRB 970228 and a class of GRBs with an initial spikelike emission , 2007, 0709.0651.

[13]  C. Bianco,et al.  GRB 060218 and GRBs associated with supernovae Ib/c , 2007, 0706.3209.

[14]  C. Bianco,et al.  GRB 050315: A Step toward Understanding the Uniqueness of the Overall Gamma-Ray Burst Structure , 2006 .

[15]  L. Amati The Ep,i–Eiso correlation in gamma-ray bursts: updated observational status, re-analysis and main implications , 2006, astro-ph/0601553.

[16]  J. Norris,et al.  Short Gamma-Ray Bursts with Extended Emission , 2006, astro-ph/0601190.

[17]  C. Bianco,et al.  Exact versus Approximate Solutions in Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows , 2005, astro-ph/0509621.

[18]  F. Prada,et al.  GRB 050509b : the elusive optical/nIR/mm afterglow of a short-duration GRB , 2005, astro-ph/0506662.

[19]  K. Pedersen,et al.  GRB 050509B: Constraints on Short Gamma-Ray Burst Models , 2005, astro-ph/0506123.

[20]  T. Sakamoto,et al.  A short γ-ray burst apparently associated with an elliptical galaxy at redshift z = 0.225 , 2005, Nature.

[21]  E. Ramirez-Ruiz,et al.  Closing in on a Short-Hard Burst Progenitor: Constraints from Early-Time Optical Imaging and Spectroscopy of a Possible Host Galaxy of GRB 050509b , 2005, astro-ph/0505480.

[22]  C. Bianco,et al.  On the Exact Analytic Expressions for the Equitemporal Surfaces in Gamma-Ray Burst Afterglows , 2005, astro-ph/0501390.

[23]  C. Bianco,et al.  EMERGENCE OF A FILAMENTARY STRUCTURE IN THE FIREBALL FROM GRB SPECTRA , 2004, astro-ph/0411760.

[24]  F. Mannucci,et al.  The Supernova rate per unit mass , 2004, astro-ph/0411450.

[25]  C. Bianco,et al.  On the Instantaneous Spectrum of Gamma-Ray Bursts , 2004, astro-ph/0405284.

[26]  C. Bianco,et al.  On the Structures in the Afterglow Peak Emission of Gamma-Ray Bursts , 2002, astro-ph/0210648.

[27]  N. Masetti,et al.  Intrinsic spectra and energetics of BeppoSAX Gamma-Ray Bursts with known redshifts , 2002, astro-ph/0205230.

[28]  M. Livio,et al.  The optical counterpart to γ-ray burst GRB970228 observed using the Hubble Space Telescope , 1997, Nature.

[29]  C. Kouveliotou,et al.  Transient optical emission from the error box of the γ-ray burst of 28 February 1997 , 1997, Nature.

[30]  C. Kouveliotou,et al.  Identification of two classes of gamma-ray bursts , 1993 .

[31]  Donald Q. Lamb,et al.  Cataclysmic variables and low-mass X-ray binaries , 1985 .

[32]  A. V. Tutukov,et al.  Supernovae of type I as end products of the evolution of binaries with components of moderate initial mass (M< or approx. =9 M/sub sun/) , 1984 .

[33]  B. Paczyński Evolution of Cataclysmic Binaries , 1981 .