Application of GQSAR for Scaffold Hopping and Lead Optimization in Multitarget Inhibitors

Many literature reports suggest that drugs against multiple targets may overcome many limitations of single targets and achieve a more effective and safer control of the disease. However, design of multitarget drugs presents a great challenge. The present study demonstrates application of a novel Group based QSAR (GQSAR) method to assist in lead optimization of multikinase (PDGFR‐beta, FGFR‐1 and SRC) and scaffold hopping of multiserotonin target (serotonin receptor 1A and serotonin transporter) inhibitors. For GQSAR analysis, a wide variety of structurally diverse multikinase inhibitors (225 molecules) and multiserotonin target inhibitors (162 molecules) were collected from various literature reports. Each molecule in the data set was divided into four fragments (kinase inhibitors) and three fragments (serotonin target inhibitors) and their corresponding two‐dimensional fragment descriptors were calculated. The multiresponse regression GQSAR models were developed for both the datasets. The developed GQSAR models were found to be useful for scaffold hopping and lead optimization of multitarget inhibitors. In addition, the developed GQSAR models provide important fragment based features that can form the building blocks to guide combinatorial library design in the search for optimally potent multitarget inhibitors.

[1]  C. D. Gelatt,et al.  Optimization by Simulated Annealing , 1983, Science.

[2]  S. Wold,et al.  The Collinearity Problem in Linear Regression. The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Generalized Inverses , 1984 .

[3]  Pero Melloni,et al.  POTENTIAL ANTIDEPRESSANT AGENTS. α-ARYLOXY-BENZYL DERIVATIVES OF ETHANOLAMINE AND MORPHOLINE , 1984 .

[4]  Alexander Tropsha,et al.  Novel Variable Selection Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Approach Based on the k-Nearest-Neighbor Principle , 2000, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[5]  C. Seyfried,et al.  5-HT reuptake inhibitors with 5-HT(1B/1D) antagonistic activity: a new approach toward efficient antidepressants. , 2000, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[6]  D. Smith,et al.  Studies towards the next generation of antidepressants. Part 1: Indolylcyclohexylamines as potent serotonin reuptake inhibitors. , 2001, Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters.

[7]  Knut Baumann,et al.  An Alignment-Independent Versatile Structure Descriptor for QSAR and QSPR Based on the Distribution of Molecular Features , 2002, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[8]  Paola Gramatica,et al.  The Importance of Being Earnest: Validation is the Absolute Essential for Successful Application and Interpretation of QSPR Models , 2003 .

[9]  Hanno Steen,et al.  Development of human protein reference database as an initial platform for approaching systems biology in humans. , 2003, Genome research.

[10]  A. Tropsha,et al.  Development and validation of k-nearest-neighbor QSPR models of metabolic stability of drug candidates. , 2003, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[11]  E. Sausville,et al.  Issues and progress with protein kinase inhibitors for cancer treatment , 2003, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[12]  Alexander Golbraikh,et al.  QSAR Modeling Using Chirality Descriptors Derived from Molecular Topology , 2003, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci..

[13]  Yasuo Konishi,et al.  Drug evolution concept in drug design: 1. Hybridization method. , 2004 .

[14]  Richard Morphy,et al.  From magic bullets to designed multiple ligands. , 2004, Drug discovery today.

[15]  Alexander Golbraikh,et al.  Application of predictive QSAR models to database mining: identification and experimental validation of novel anticonvulsant compounds. , 2004, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[16]  R. Morphy,et al.  Designed multiple ligands. An emerging drug discovery paradigm. , 2005, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[17]  M. Fielden,et al.  Development of a large-scale chemogenomics database to improve drug candidate selection and to understand mechanisms of chemical toxicity and action. , 2005, Journal of biotechnology.

[18]  F. Sams-Dodd Target-based drug discovery: is something wrong? , 2005, Drug discovery today.

[19]  Péter Csermely,et al.  The efficiency of multi-target drugs: the network approach might help drug design. , 2004, Trends in pharmacological sciences.

[20]  S. Frantz Drug discovery: Playing dirty , 2005, Nature.

[21]  M. Millan Multi-target strategies for the improved treatment of depressive states: Conceptual foundations and neuronal substrates, drug discovery and therapeutic application. , 2006, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[22]  John P. Overington,et al.  Can we rationally design promiscuous drugs? , 2006, Current opinion in structural biology.

[23]  Richard Morphy,et al.  The physicochemical challenges of designing multiple ligands. , 2006, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[24]  G. Hortobagyi,et al.  Mechanisms of Disease: understanding resistance to HER2-targeted therapy in human breast cancer , 2006, Nature Clinical Practice Oncology.

[25]  István A. Kovács,et al.  How to design multi-target drugs , 2007, Expert opinion on drug discovery.

[26]  M. Verdonk,et al.  A comparison of physicochemical property profiles of marketed oral drugs and orally bioavailable anti-cancer protein kinase inhibitors in clinical development. , 2007, Current topics in medicinal chemistry.

[27]  K. Shokat,et al.  Escape from HER family tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy by the kinase inactive HER3 , 2007, Nature.

[28]  H. Kitano A robustness-based approach to systems-oriented drug design , 2007, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[29]  J. Lehár,et al.  Multi-target therapeutics: when the whole is greater than the sum of the parts. , 2007, Drug discovery today.

[30]  Josep Tabernero,et al.  The Role of VEGF and EGFR Inhibition: Implications for Combining Anti–VEGF and Anti–EGFR Agents , 2007, Molecular Cancer Research.

[31]  Richard Morphy,et al.  Fragments, network biology and designing multiple ligands. , 2007, Drug discovery today.

[32]  Luhua Lai,et al.  Discovery of multitarget inhibitors by combining molecular docking with common pharmacophore matching. , 2008, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[33]  Martin Krug,et al.  Recent advances in the development of multi-kinase inhibitors. , 2008, Mini reviews in medicinal chemistry.

[34]  Xiaohua Ma,et al.  Mechanisms of drug combinations: interaction and network perspectives , 2009, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[35]  Sudhir A. Kulkarni,et al.  Group‐Based QSAR (G‐QSAR): Mitigating Interpretation Challenges in QSAR , 2009 .

[36]  B Xie,et al.  Synergistic therapeutic actions of herbal ingredients and their mechanisms from molecular interaction and network perspectives. , 2009, Drug discovery today.

[37]  V. Tumiatti,et al.  Polyamines in drug discovery: from the universal template approach to the multitarget-directed ligand design strategy. , 2010, Journal of medicinal chemistry.

[38]  Sudhir A. Kulkarni,et al.  A comprehensive structure-activity analysis of protein kinase B-alpha (Akt1) inhibitors. , 2010, Journal of molecular graphics & modelling.

[39]  Keun Woo Lee,et al.  Molecular Docking and Pharmacophore Filtering in the Discovery of Dual-Inhibitors for Human Leukotriene A4 Hydrolase and Leukotriene C4 Synthase , 2011, J. Chem. Inf. Model..

[40]  Andreas Bender,et al.  From in silico target prediction to multi-target drug design: current databases, methods and applications. , 2011, Journal of proteomics.

[41]  V. Poroikov,et al.  Fragment-based design, docking, synthesis, biological evaluation and structure-activity relationships of 2-benzo/benzisothiazolimino-5-aryliden-4-thiazolidinones as cycloxygenase/lipoxygenase inhibitors. , 2012, European journal of medicinal chemistry.