EXPERIMENTAL ECOLOGICAL GENETICS IN PLANTAGO. V. COMPONENTS OF SEED YIELD IN THE RIBWORT PLANTAIN PLANTAGO LANCEOLATA L.

The study of the manner in which plants vary in their seed yield has usually been the province of agronomists and plant breeders interested in crop production. Such studies have used the approach of partitioning yield into a number of components, and then examining causes of variation in the individual components as well as the interrelationships among them (for discussion see Adams, 1967; Grafius and Thomas, 1971). These yield components may be morphological or physiological attributes. Frequently, emphasis is placed on the "major" yield components, namely weight per seed, number of seeds per fruit, number of fruits per inflorescence, and number of inflorescences per plant. Together these major yield components multiplicatively determine total weight of seed per plant, a commonly used measure of yield. The methods and concepts employed in the analysis of yield components can be applied to analysis of components of fitness in natural populations. Thus the amount of resources allocated by the plant to seed production (seed yield) is directly related to its reproductive output (number and size of seeds), and, in that these resources are no longer available for growth and survival, the amount devoted to seed may be inversely related to longevity (Gadgil and Bossert, 1970; Primack, 1979). With regard to components of seed yield it is surprising that the study of yield components and their interrelationships have been largely confined to an agronomic context. The few studies that have been done on natural popula-

[1]  A. Templeton The evolution of life histories under pleiotropic constraints and r-selection , 1980 .

[2]  R. Primack,et al.  SEXUAL STRATEGIES IN PLANTS. II. DATA ON THE TEMPORAL REGULATION OF MATERNAL INVESTMENT , 1980 .

[3]  R. Wyatt THE REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY OF ASCLEPIAS TUBEROSA: I. FLOWER NUMBER, ARRANGEMENT, AND FRUIT‐SET , 1980 .

[4]  J. T. Giesel Genetic co-variation of survivorship and other fitness indices in Drosophila melanogaster , 1979, Experimental Gerontology.

[5]  V. Grant Character Coherence in Natural Hybrid Populations in Plants , 1979, Botanical Gazette.

[6]  A. Teramura,et al.  Localized populational differences in the photosynthetic response to temperature and irradiance in Plantago lanceolata , 1979 .

[7]  R. Primack Reproductive Effort in Annual and Perennial Species of Plantago (Plantaginaceae) , 1979, The American Naturalist.

[8]  M. C. Grant,et al.  BIOLOGY OF ECOLOGICALLY MARGINAL POPULATIONS OF ANTHOXANTHUM ODORATUM. I. PHENETICS AND DYNAMICS , 1978, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[9]  R. Primack REGULATION OF SEED YIELD IN PLANTAGO , 1978 .

[10]  R. Primack EVOLUTIONARY ASPECTS OF WIND POLLINATION IN THE GENUS PLANTAGO (PLANTAGINACEAE) , 1978 .

[11]  M. Willson,et al.  THE EVOLUTION OF INFLORESCENCE SIZE IN ASCLEPIAS (ASCLEPIADACEAE) , 1977, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[12]  H. Wilbur Propagule Size, Number, and Dispersion Pattern in Ambystoma and Asclepias , 1977, The American Naturalist.

[13]  D. Levin,et al.  Clutch size in the Compositae , 1977 .

[14]  W. Platt,et al.  Ecological Relationships of Co-Occurring Goldenrods (Solidago: Compositae) , 1976, The American Naturalist.

[15]  H. Wilbur Life history evolution in seven milkweeds of the genus Asclepias. , 1976 .

[16]  J. Antonovics THE NATURE OF LIMITS TO NATURAL SELECTION , 1976 .

[17]  A. Bradshaw,et al.  Adaptation to heterogeneous environments. II.* Phenotypic plasticity in response to spacing in Linum , 1976 .

[18]  L. T. Evans,et al.  Aspects of the Comparative Physilogy of Grain Yield in Cereals , 1976 .

[19]  M. Willson,et al.  Adaptive design of the floral display in Asclepias syriaca L , 1974 .

[20]  M. Ross Inheritance of self-incompatibility in Plantago lanceolata , 1973, Heredity.

[21]  G. M. Prine,et al.  Low Light Intensity Effects on Grain Sorghum at Different Stages of Growth 1 , 1972 .

[22]  J. E. Grafius,et al.  The case for indirect genetic control of sequential traits and the strategy of deployment of environmental resources by the plant , 1971, Heredity.

[23]  William H. Bossert,et al.  Life Historical Consequences of Natural Selection , 1970, The American Naturalist.

[24]  R. Q. Cannell,et al.  Selection for Grain Yield and Components of Yield in Barley1 , 1970 .

[25]  S. Cook,et al.  "Clutch Size" in Buttercups , 1968, The American Naturalist.

[26]  M. W. Adams Basis of Yield Component Compensation in Crop Plants With Special Reference to the Field Bean, Phaseolus vulgaris 1 , 1967 .

[27]  A. D. Bradshaw,et al.  Evolutionary Significance of Phenotypic Plasticity in Plants , 1965 .

[28]  J. Harper,et al.  Biological Flora of the British Isles. Plantago major L., P. media L. and P. lanceolata. , 1964 .

[29]  E. R. Leng Component Analysis in Inheritance Studies of Grain Yield in Maize 1 , 1963 .

[30]  D. J. Watson The Physiological Basis of Variation in Yield , 1952 .