Complementing the net benefit approach: A new framework for Bayesian cost-effectiveness analysis

Objectives: The aim of cost-effectiveness analysis is to maximize health benefits from a given budget, taking a societal perspective. Consequently, the comparison of alternative treatments or technologies is solely based on their expected effectiveness and cost. However, the expectation, or mean, poses important limitations as it might be a poor summary of the underlying distribution, for instance when the effectiveness is a categorical variable, or when the distributions of either effectiveness or cost present a high degree of asymmetry. Clinical variables often present these characteristics. Methods: In this study, we present a framework for cost-effectiveness analysis based on the whole posterior distribution of effectiveness and cost. Results: An application with real data is included to illustrate the analysis. Decision-making measures such as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, incremental net-benefit, and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves, can also be defined under the new framework. Conclusions: This framework overcomes limitations of the mean and offers complementary information for the decision maker.

[1]  M. Sculpher,et al.  Representing uncertainty: the role of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. , 2001, Health economics.

[2]  A H Briggs,et al.  A Bayesian approach to stochastic cost-effectiveness analysis. , 1999, Health economics.

[3]  Stefan Michiels,et al.  Meta-analysis when only the median survival times are known: A comparison with individual patient data results , 2005, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[4]  J. Zivin Cost-effectiveness analysis with risk aversion. , 2001, Health economics.

[5]  A O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian methods for design and analysis of cost-effectiveness trials in the evaluation of health care technologies , 2002, Statistical methods in medical research.

[6]  D. Brock Ethical Issues in the Use of Cost Effectiveness Analysis for the Prioritization of Health Resources , 2004 .

[7]  B. Rewari,et al.  Antiretroviral Therapy for HIV Infection , 2007 .

[8]  D Polsky,et al.  Confidence intervals for cost-effectiveness ratios: a comparison of four methods. , 1997, Health economics.

[9]  B. O'brien,et al.  Building uncertainty into cost-effectiveness rankings: portfolio risk-return tradeoffs and implications for decision rules. , 2000, Medical care.

[10]  N. Zethraeus,et al.  Definition, interpretation and calculation of cost-effectiveness acceptability curves. , 2000, Health economics.

[11]  John Mullahy,et al.  Net Health Benefits: A New Framework for the Analysis of Uncertainty in Cost-Effectiveness Analysis , 1998 .

[12]  E. Elbasha Risk aversion and uncertainty in cost-effectiveness analysis: the expected-utility, moment-generating function approach. , 2005, Health economics.

[13]  Umesh Singh,et al.  Bayesian Statistics And Its Applications , 2007 .

[14]  A J Moskowitz,et al.  Bayesian estimation of cost-effectiveness ratios from clinical trials. , 1999, Health economics.

[15]  A. Willan On the probability of cost-effectiveness using data from randomized clinical trials , 2001, BMC medical research methodology.

[16]  Jeffrey S Hoch,et al.  Using the net benefit regression framework to construct cost-effectiveness acceptability curves: an example using data from a trial of external loop recorders versus Holter monitoring for ambulatory monitoring of "community acquired" syncope , 2006, BMC Health Services Research.

[17]  John C. Hershey,et al.  Carrier Screening for Cystic Fibrosis , 1998, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[18]  John Brazier,et al.  Efficiency, equity, and NICE clinical guidelines , 2004, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  M J Al,et al.  A Bayesian approach to economic analyses of clinical trials: the case of stenting versus balloon angioplasty. , 2000, Health economics.

[20]  George Khushf,et al.  Handbook of bioethics : taking stock of the field from a philosophical perspective , 2004 .

[21]  S. Hammer,et al.  Antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection in 1998: updated recommendations of the International AIDS Society-USA Panel. , 1997, JAMA.

[22]  A. W. Kemp,et al.  Kendall's Advanced Theory of Statistics. , 1994 .

[23]  Anthony O'Hagan,et al.  The probability of cost-effectiveness , 2002, BMC medical research methodology.

[24]  David J. Vanness,et al.  Perspectives on Mean-based Evaluation of Health Care , 2006 .

[25]  A O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian cost‐effectiveness analysis from clinical trial data , 2001, Statistics in medicine.