Use of preoperative magnetic resonance imaging T1 and T2 sequences to determine intraoperative meningioma consistency

Background: Meningioma firmness is a critical factor that influences ease of resection and risk, notably when operating on tumors intimate with neurovascular structures such as the mesial sphenoid wing. This study develops a predictive tool using preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics to determine meningioma consistency. Methods: 101 patients with intracranial meningioma (50 soft/51 firm) were included. MRI characteristics of 38 tumors (19 soft/19 firm) were retrospectively reviewed to identify preoperative imaging features that were then correlated with intraoperative description of the tumor as either “soft and/or suckable” or “firm and/or fibrous”. Criteria were developed to predict consistency and then blindly applied to the remaining 63 meningiomas (31 soft/32 firm). Results: The overall sensitivities for detecting soft and firm consistency were 90% and 56%, respectively (95% CI = 73–97% and 38–73%; P < 0.001). Compared to gray matter, meningiomas that were T2 hypointense were almost always firm. Soft meningiomas were hyperintense on T2 and hypointense on T1. Soft meningiomas were slightly larger and less likely to be associated with edema. There was a slight preponderance of firm meningiomas in the infratentorial compartment. Grade of meningioma was not predictive. Contrast enhancement, diffusion restriction, changes in overlying bone, intratumoral cysts, and angiographic features were not predictable. Conclusions: This tool using T1 and T2 series predicts meningioma consistency. Such knowledge should assist the surgeon in preoperative planning and counseling.

[1]  J. Koivukangas,et al.  Low-field MR imaging of meningiomas including dynamic contrast enhancement study: evaluation of surgical and histopathologic characteristics. , 2006, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[2]  W. Joo,et al.  Peritumoral brain edema in meningiomas: correlations between magnetic resonance imaging, angiography, and pathology. , 2008, Surgical neurology.

[3]  H. Kashimura,et al.  Prediction of meningioma consistency using fractional anisotropy value measured by magnetic resonance imaging. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery.

[4]  J. Kuratsu,et al.  Correlation between magnetic resonance images and histology in meningiomas: T2-weighted images indicate collagen contents in tissues. , 1995, Neurologia medico-chirurgica.

[5]  S. Coons,et al.  Using ex vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy to reveal associations between biochemical and biological features of meningiomas. , 2010, Neurosurgical focus.

[6]  Y.H. Chan,et al.  Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging: Diagnosing Atypical or Malignant Meningiomas and Detecting Tumor Dedifferentiation , 2008, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[7]  F. Di Salle,et al.  Intracranial meningiomas: correlations between MR imaging and histology. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[8]  A. Friedman,et al.  Surgical Management of Petroclival Meningiomas: Defining Resection Goals Based on Risk of Neurological Morbidity and Tumor Recurrence Rates in 137 Patients , 2005, Neurosurgery.

[9]  Harvey Cushing,et al.  Meningiomas : their classification, regional behaviour, life history, and surgical end results , 1938 .

[10]  T. Yoshimine,et al.  Scoring radiologic characteristics to predict proliferative potential in meningiomas , 2006, Brain Tumor Pathology.