Medical Innovation Revisited: Social Contagion versus Marketing Effort1

This article shows that Medical Innovation—the landmark study by Coleman, Katz, and Menzel—and several subsequent studies analyzing the diffusion of the drug tetracycline have confounded social contagion with marketing effects. The article describes the medical community’s understanding of tetracycline and how the drug was marketed. This situational analysis finds no reasons to expect social contagion; instead, aggressive marketing efforts may have played an important role. The Medical Innovation data set is reanalyzed and supplemented with newly collected advertising data. When marketing efforts are controlled for, contagion effects disappear. The article underscores the importance of controlling for potential confounds when studying the role of social contagion in innovation diffusion.

[1]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[2]  T. Caplow,et al.  Factors Influencing the Selection of Pharmaceutical Products , 1954 .

[3]  Elihu Katz,et al.  Social Relations and Innovation in the Medical Profession: The Epidemiology of a New Drug , 1955 .

[4]  Walter J. Murphy Million Dollar Bugs , 1955 .

[5]  Kehoe Ra The education of physicians for industry; introduction. , 1956, Journal of medical education.

[6]  W. Bean AN ANALYTICAL study of North Carolina general practice 1953-1954. , 1957, Journal of medical education.

[7]  R. Ferber,et al.  The effectiveness of pharmaceutical promotion , 1958 .

[8]  RISK HANDLING IN DRUG ADOPTION: THE ROLE OF COMPANY PREFERENCE , 1961 .

[9]  Elihu Katz,et al.  The Social Itinerary of Technical Change: Two Studies on the Diffusion of Innovation , 1961 .

[10]  Charles Winick,et al.  The Diffusion of an Innovation Among Physicians in a Large City , 1961 .

[11]  J. Harris Survey of medical communication sources available for continuing physician education. , 1966, Journal of medical education.

[12]  J. Coleman,et al.  Medical Innovation: A Diffusion Study. , 1967 .

[13]  R. Posner The Federal Trade Commission , 1969 .

[14]  David B. Montgomery,et al.  Estimating Dynamic Effects of Market Communications Expenditures , 1972 .

[15]  H. Bonus Quasi-Engel Curves, Diffusion, and the Ownership of Major Consumer Durables , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[16]  Mitchell H. Taibleson,et al.  Distinguishing Between Contagion, Heterogeneity and Randomness in Stochastic Models , 1974 .

[17]  J. Besag Statistical Analysis of Non-Lattice Data , 1975 .

[18]  David Collier,et al.  Prerequisites Versus Diffusion: Testing Alternative Explanations of Social Security Adoption , 1975, American Political Science Review.

[19]  Charles Kadushin,et al.  The Intersection of Social Circles , 1976 .

[20]  R. Bond,et al.  Sales, Promotion and Product Dif-ferentiation in Two Prescription Drug Markets , 1977 .

[21]  Mark S. Granovetter Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[22]  L. Erbring,et al.  Individuals and Social Structure , 1979 .

[23]  D. Aaker,et al.  Chapter 2 – Marketing research , 2004 .

[24]  Lawrence A. Brown,et al.  Innovation Diffusion: A New Perspective , 1984 .

[25]  Ambar G. Rao,et al.  Bayesian Estimation and Control of Detailing Effort in a Repeat Purchase Diffusion Environment , 1981 .

[26]  J. Ord,et al.  Spatial Diffusion: An Historical Geography of Epidemics in an Island Community , 1981 .

[27]  P. Allison Discrete-Time Methods for the Analysis of Event Histories , 1982 .

[28]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[29]  Richard P. Bagozzi,et al.  Principles of marketing management , 1986 .

[30]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  A note on sociometric order in the general social survey network data , 1986 .

[31]  R. Burt Social Contagion and Innovation: Cohesion versus Structural Equivalence , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  Timothy H. Hannan,et al.  Rival Precedence and the Dynamics of Technology Adoption: An Empirical Analysis , 1987 .

[33]  V. Mahajan,et al.  Innovation Diffusion Models of New Product Acceptance. , 1987 .

[34]  G. Urban,et al.  You have printed the following article : Modeling Multiattribute Utility , Risk , and Belief Dynamics for New Consumer Durable Brand Choice , 2007 .

[35]  Richard E. Caves,et al.  Persuasion or Information? Promotion and the Shares of Brand Name and Generic Pharmaceuticals , 1988, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[36]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[37]  J. Hausman,et al.  Flexible parametric estimation of duration and competing risk models , 1990 .

[38]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Brand Introduction Strategies and Competitive Environments , 1990 .

[39]  Rabikar Chatterjee,et al.  The Innovation Diffusion Process in a Heterogeneous Population: A Micromodeling Approach , 1990 .

[40]  A. Hamerle On a Simple Test for Neglected Heterogeneity in Panel Studies , 1990 .

[41]  Lakshman Krishnamurthi,et al.  Response Function Estimation Using the Equity Estimator , 1991 .

[42]  David Strang,et al.  Adding Social Structure to Diffusion Models , 1991 .

[43]  Christophe Van den Bulte,et al.  The 4P classification of the marketing mix revisited , 1992 .

[44]  Albert C. Bemmaor Modeling the Diffusion of New Durable Goods: Word-of-Mouth Effect Versus Consumer Heterogeneity , 1992 .

[45]  D. Strang,et al.  Spatial and Temporal Heterogeneity in Diffusion , 1993, American Journal of Sociology.

[46]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  Network Studies of Social Influence , 1993 .

[47]  D. Commenges,et al.  Test of homogeneity of binary data with explanatory variables. , 1994, Biometrics.

[48]  Everett M. Rogers,et al.  A History of Communication Study: A Biographical Approach , 1994 .

[49]  Lakshman Krishnamurthi,et al.  Analysis of New Product Diffusion Using a Four-Segment Trial-Repeat Model , 1994 .

[50]  P. Hedström Contagious Collectivities: On the Spatial Diffusion of Swedish Trade Unions, 1890-1940 , 1994, American Journal of Sociology.

[51]  David H. Reiley,et al.  The Roles of Marketing, Product Quality and Price Competition in the Growth and Composition of the U.S. Anti-Ulcer Drug Industry , 1994 .

[52]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Systems Competition and Network Effects , 1994 .

[53]  David H. Reiley,et al.  The Roles of Marketing, Product Quality and Price Competition in the Growth and Composition of the U.S. Anti-Ulcer Drug Industry , 1994 .

[54]  John B. Casterline,et al.  Social learning social influence and new models of fertility. , 1996 .

[55]  T. Valente Social network thresholds in the diffusion of innovations , 1996 .

[56]  Pamela R. Haunschild,et al.  Modes of Interorganizational Imitation: The Effects of Outcome Salience and Uncertainty , 1997 .

[57]  H. Blossfeld,et al.  Rational Choice Theory and Large-Scale Data Analysis , 1998 .

[58]  Gregory S. Carpenter,et al.  Late Mover Advantage: How Innovative Late Entrants Outsell Pioneers: , 1998 .

[59]  J. Fitzmaurice Economy and Society , 1998 .

[60]  J. Rizzo,et al.  Advertising and Competition in the Ethical Pharmaceutical Industry: The Case of Antihypertensive Drugs* , 1999, The Journal of Law and Economics.

[61]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of innovations , 1964, Encyclopedia of Sport Management.