Transient electromagnetic responses during the transmitter on-time

Current time-domain electromagnetic induction instruments generally only utilize data acquired after the cessation of the transmitted field. During this "off time", signals are dominated by induced eddy currents and magnetic surface modes, but do not fully capture the magnetostatic response of permeable and conductive metallic ordnance. In this paper, we investigate the response of EMI systems that measure signals during excitation of the primary magnetic field (the so-called "on-time"). Our analysis shows that on-time signals have great potential to yield useful information that is not often exploited in current EMI systems. We compare analytical models to data from state-of-the-art time-domain EM sensors that have the capability to sample receivers during the on-time. We present modeling results that represent the responses from different current ramps and on-time waveforms for objects and ground. We consider target and clutter objects and grounds having a range of material properties, shapes and sizes, and configurations and investigate signal processing and inversion methods for target detection and discrimination. Specifically, correlations between on-time and off-time signals are shown to be a powerful tool for discriminating ferrous and non-ferrous metallic objects.

[1]  Gregory M. Schultz,et al.  Inversion of inductive electromagnetic data in highly conductive terrains , 2005 .

[2]  D. Oldenburg,et al.  A Discrimination Algorithm for UXO Using Time Domain Electromagnetics , 2001 .

[3]  Peter B Weichman Universal early-time response in high-contrast electromagnetic scattering. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[4]  Yogadhish Das,et al.  Time Domain Response of a Sphere in the Field of a Coil: Theory And Experiment , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Y. Das,et al.  Time-domain response of a metal detector to a target buried in soil with frequency-dependent magnetic susceptibility , 2006, SPIE Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[6]  Upendra Raval,et al.  Quasi-stationary electromagnetic response of covered permeable conductors to some pulses of spatially uniform magnetic field , 1973 .

[7]  Lloyd S. Riggs,et al.  Identification of metallic mine-like objects using low frequency magnetic fields , 2001, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[8]  James Macnae,et al.  Evaluating EM waveforms by singular‐value decomposition of exponential basis functions , 1998 .

[9]  James R. Wait,et al.  A conducting sphere in a time varying magnetic field , 1951 .

[10]  Daniel Sattel,et al.  Improving conductivity models using on-time EM data , 1998 .

[11]  R. Blakely Potential theory in gravity and magnetic applications , 1996 .

[12]  James R. Wait,et al.  Quasi-Static Transient Response of a Conducting Permeable Sphere , 1969 .

[13]  Leonard R. Pasion,et al.  Computing Transient Electromagnetic Responses of a Metallic Object Using a Spheroidal Excitation Approach , 2008, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[14]  Fridon Shubitidze,et al.  Target localization techniques for vehicle-based electromagnetic induction array applications , 2010, Defense + Commercial Sensing.

[15]  Clifford H. Thurber,et al.  Parameter estimation and inverse problems , 2005 .