Processing of frequency-modulated stimuli in the chick auditory cortex analogue: evidence for topographic representations and possible mechanisms of rate and directional sensitivity

SummaryResponses of units in the auditory forebrain (field L/hyperstriatum ventrale-complex) of awake domestic chicks were studied to frequency-modulated (FM) signals and isointensity tone bursts, presented to the ear contralateral to the recording sites. FM signals, linear frequency sweeps in the range of 50 Hz to 10.25 kHz, differed in the rate of change of frequency (RCF) and in the direction of modulation. The majority of RCF response functions obtained could be classified as predominantly ascending and bell shaped. Best rates of change of frequency (BRCFs), assigned to these functions, covered a range of nearly 3 orders of magnitude. BRCFs of the same units for upward (positive BRCFs) and for downward modulations (negative BRCFs) were correlated. The lowest BRCF encountered among all units for a given isointensity ON-response bandwidth (ΔFon) increased as a function of ΔFon. ΔFon was derived from the responses to tone bursts of various frequencies at 70 dB SPL. As ΔFON tended to increase with the best frequency (BF) of units the lowest BRCF encountered among all units for a given BF also increased as a function of BF. Positive and negative BRCFs of a unit were also correlated with the slopes of onset latency-frequency relationships below and above BF, respectively. FM responses were optimal, when the frequency-specific latency differences at a given unit were compensated by the direction and rate of frequency change in the signal. FM-directional sensitivity varied with BF. Most units with BFs below about 2 kHz preferred upward modulations, while those with BFs above 2 kHz preferred downward modulations. Directional preference and sensitivity correlated with asymmetric distributions of inhibitory sidebands around BF, as derived from the analysis of OFF-responses. Maximum directional sensitivity for a given BRCF increased with BRCF. BRCF and FM-directional sensitivity were topographically organized on neuronal planes harboring units with similar BFs (“isofrequency planes”). Highest BRCFs were observed in the input-layer L2 of field L. BRCF declined along a rostrocaudal isofrequency axis in all 4 subdivisions of the auditory forebrain. Similarly, response strength shifted from rostral to caudal as a function of RCF. FM-directional sensitivity was organized in a subdivision-specific fashion. Units in the input-layer of field L (L2), and even more so in the hyperstriatum ventrale, were fairly insensitive to the direction of modulation, whereas units in the postsynaptic layers of field L (L1 and L3) exhibited higher degrees of directional sensitivity. Directional sensitivity also declined along the rostrocaudal isofrequency axis of field L. Two simple models of connectivity in the chick auditory forebrain are presented, which could be sufficient to explain these results. One is based on a tonotopic arrangement of afferent synapses on dendrites and somata of units in L2, the other on local lateral inhibition in the postsynaptic layers of field L.

[1]  A. Sillito.  Inhibitory processes underlying the directional specificity of simple, complex and hypercomplex cells in the cat's visual cortex , 1977, The Journal of physiology.

[2]  S. Erulkar,et al.  SYNAPTIC MECHANISMS OF EXCITATION AND INHIBITION IN THE CENTRAL AUDITORY PATHWAY. , 1963, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  B. Walmsley,et al.  Effects of spatial and temporal dispersion of synaptic input on the time course of synaptic potentials. , 1989, Journal of neurophysiology.

[4]  G. Langner,et al.  Topographic representation of periodicities in the forebrain of the mynah bird: one map for pitch and rhythm? , 1987, Brain Research.

[5]  M. Joos,et al.  The Spectrographic Analysis of Sound Signals of the Domestic Fowl , 1953 .

[6]  H. Scheich,et al.  Quantitative analysis and two-dimensional reconstruction of the tonotopic organization of the auditory field L in the chick from 2-deoxyglucose data , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[7]  G. Langner,et al.  Evidence for neuronal periodicity detection in the auditory system of the Guinea fowl: Implications for pitch analysis in the time domain , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[8]  N. Daw,et al.  Directionally sensitive ganglion cells in the rabbit retina: specificity for stimulus direction, size, and speed. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[9]  I. Whitfield,et al.  RESPONSES OF AUDITORY CORTICAL NEURONS TO STIMULI OF CHANGING FREQUENCY. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  S D Erulkar,et al.  Experimental and theoretical approaches to neural processing in the central auditory pathway. , 1968, Contributions to sensory physiology.

[11]  Tonotopic organization and functional characterization of the auditory thalamus in a songbird, the European starling , 1987, Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

[12]  N Suga,et al.  Analysis of frequency‐modulated sounds by auditory neurones of echo‐locating bats. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[13]  G. Werner,et al.  Cortical information processing of stimulus motion on primate skin. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[14]  N Suga,et al.  Functional properties of auditory neurones in the cortex of echo‐locating bats. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[15]  M. Biederman-Thorson.  Auditory responses of units in the ovoid nucleus and cerebrum (field L) of the ring dove. , 1970, Brain research.

[16]  H Scheich,et al.  Spatial representation of frequency‐modulated signals in the tonotopically organized auditory cortex analogue of the chick , 1992, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[17]  M. Cynader,et al.  Sensitivity of cat primary auditory cortex (Al) neurons to the direction and rate of frequency modulation , 1985, Brain Research.

[18]  E P Gardner,et al.  Objective classification of motion- and direction-sensitive neurons in primary somatosensory cortex of awake monkeys. , 1986, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  A. Møller.  Coding of sounds with rapidly varying spectrum in the cochlear nucleus. , 1974, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  Nobuo Suga,et al.  FEATURE EXTRACTION IN THE AUDITORY SYSTEM OF BATS , 1973 .

[21]  E. P. Gardner,et al.  Neuronal mechanisms underlying direction sensitivity of somatosensory cortical neurons in awake monkeys. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  Jay M. Goldberg,et al.  SOME DISCHARGE CHARACTERISTICS OF SINGLE NEURONS IN THE INFERIOR COLLICULUS OF THE CAT. I. TONOTOPICAL ORGANIZATION, RELATION OF SPIKE-COUNTS TO TONE INTENSITY, AND FIRING PATTERNS OF SINGLE ELEMENTS , 1963 .

[23]  A R Møller.  Coding of time-varying sounds in the cochlear nucleus. , 1978, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[24]  D. P. Phillips,et al.  Responses of single neurones in cat auditory cortex to time-varying stimuli: frequency-modulated tones of narrow excursion , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  D. Irvine,et al.  Sensitivity of neurons in cat primary auditory cortex to tones and frequency-modulated stimuli. II: Organization of response properties along the ‘isofrequency’ dimension , 1992, Hearing Research.

[26]  Robert J. Dooling,et al.  Hearing in the parakeet (Melopsittacus undulatus): absolute thresholds, critical ratios, frequency difference limens, and vocalizations. , 1975, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[27]  Gerald Langner,et al.  Processing of pure tone and frequency modulated stimuli by units in the avian auditory forebrain , 1989 .

[28]  H. Scheich,et al.  Connectivity of the auditory forebrain nuclei in the Guinea Fowl (Numida meleagris) , 1979, Cell and Tissue Research.

[29]  H. Scheich,et al.  Responsiveness of units in the auditory neostriatum of the guinea fowl (Numida meleagris) to species-specific calls and synthetic stimuli , 1979, Journal of comparative physiology.

[30]  L Ganz,et al.  Mechanism of directional selectivity in simple neurons of the cat's visual cortex analyzed with stationary flash sequences. , 1984, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  D. Irvine,et al.  Sensitivity of neurons in cat primary auditory cortex to tones and frequency-modulated stimuli. I: Effects of variation of stimulus parameters , 1992, Hearing Research.

[32]  H Scheich,et al.  Contribution of GABAergic inhibition to the response characteristics of auditory units in the avian forebrain. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  H. Scheich,et al.  Functional organization of the avian auditory cortex analogue. I. Topographic representation of isointensity bandwidth , 1991, Brain Research.

[34]  M. Sachs,et al.  Aspects of frequency discrimination in passerine birds and pigeons. , 1980, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[35]  H. Scheich,et al.  2-deoxyglucose accumulation parallels extracellularly recorded spike activity in the avian auditory neostriatum , 1984, Brain Research.

[36]  H. Scheich,et al.  Functional organization of the avian auditory cortex analogue. II. Topographic distribution of latency , 1991, Brain Research.

[37]  C. Daniel Geisler,et al.  Auditory-nerve fiber responses to frequency-modulated tones , 1981, Hearing Research.

[38]  S. Erulkar,et al.  Responses of units of the inferior colliculus to time-varying acoustic stimuli. , 1966, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  D. D. Greenwood,et al.  Excitatory and inhibitory response areas of auditory neurons in the cochlear nucleus. , 1965, Journal of neurophysiology.

[40]  R. Britt,et al.  Synaptic events and discharge patterns of cochlear nucleus cells. II. Frequency-modulated tones. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  Detection of upward and downward frequency sweeps in the european starling (Sturnus vulgaris) , 1991, Naturwissenschaften.

[42]  G. Dörrscheidt,et al.  Setting complex tasks to single units in the avian auditory forebrain. I: Processing of complex artificial stimuli , 1992, Hearing Research.

[43]  H. Barlow,et al.  The mechanism of directionally selective units in rabbit's retina. , 1965, The Journal of physiology.

[44]  Gerald Langner,et al.  Acoustic Communication in the Guinea Fowl (Numida Meleagris) , 1983 .

[45]  J. B. Kelly,et al.  Primary auditory cortex in the ferret (Mustela putorius): neural response properties and topographic organization , 1988, Brain Research.

[46]  Wilfrid Rall,et al.  Theoretical significance of dendritic trees for neuronal input-output relations , 1964 .

[47]  S. Erulkar,et al.  Excitation and inhibition in cochlear nucleus. II. Frequency-modulated tones. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[48]  Hans -Joachim Leppelsack.  Funktionelle Eigenschaften der Hörbahn im Feld L des Neostriatum caudale des Staren (Sturnus vulgaris L., Aves) , 1974, Journal of comparative physiology.

[49]  N Suga,et al.  Analysis of frequency‐modulated and complex sounds by single auditory neurones of bats , 1968, The Journal of physiology.

[50]  H. Scheich,et al.  POSTNATAL SHIFT OF TONOTOPIC ORGANIZATION IN THE CHICK AUDITORY CORTEX ANALOGUE , 1992, Neuroreport.

[51]  D. Anderson,et al.  Sensitivity of single neurons in auditory cortex of cat to binaural tonal stimulation; effects of varying interaural time and intensity. , 1969, Journal of neurophysiology.